Behavior Matters: An Alternative Perspective on Promoting Responsible Data Science

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.17273v1
• Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 16:59:18 GMT
• Title: Behavior Matters: An Alternative Perspective on Promoting Responsible Data Science
• Authors: Ziwei Dong, Ameya Patil, Yuichi Shoda, Leilani Battle, Emily Wall,
• Abstract summary: Data science pipelines can easily propagate social inequity and harm. Traditional solutions are technical in nature; e.g., mitigating biased algorithms. We introduce a novel lens for promoting responsible data science using theories of behavior change.
• Score: 9.696812613037448
• License:
• Abstract: Data science pipelines inform and influence many daily decisions, from what we buy to who we work for and even where we live. When designed incorrectly, these pipelines can easily propagate social inequity and harm. Traditional solutions are technical in nature; e.g., mitigating biased algorithms. In this vision paper, we introduce a novel lens for promoting responsible data science using theories of behavior change that emphasize not only technical solutions but also the behavioral responsibility of practitioners. By integrating behavior change theories from cognitive psychology with data science workflow knowledge and ethics guidelines, we present a new perspective on responsible data science. We present example data science interventions in machine learning and visual data analysis, contextualized in behavior change theories that could be implemented to interrupt and redirect potentially suboptimal or negligent practices while reinforcing ethically conscious behaviors. We conclude with a call to action to our community to explore this new research area of behavior change interventions for responsible data science.

Related papers

• Decoding Susceptibility: Modeling Misbelief to Misinformation Through a Computational Approach [61.04606493712002]
  Susceptibility to misinformation describes the degree of belief in unverifiable claims that is not observable. Existing susceptibility studies heavily rely on self-reported beliefs. We propose a computational approach to model users' latent susceptibility levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T07:22:56Z)
• A Survey on Knowledge Editing of Neural Networks [43.813073385305806]
  Even the largest artificial neural networks make mistakes, and once-correct predictions can become invalid as the world progresses in time. Knowledge editing is emerging as a novel area of research that aims to enable reliable, data-efficient, and fast changes to a pre-trained target model. We first introduce the problem of editing neural networks, formalize it in a common framework and differentiate it from more notorious branches of research such as continuous learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T16:29:47Z)
• Explaining by Imitating: Understanding Decisions by Interpretable Policy Learning [72.80902932543474]
  Understanding human behavior from observed data is critical for transparency and accountability in decision-making. Consider real-world settings such as healthcare, in which modeling a decision-maker's policy is challenging. We propose a data-driven representation of decision-making behavior that inheres transparency by design, accommodates partial observability, and operates completely offline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T13:06:14Z)
• Interpretable Imitation Learning with Dynamic Causal Relations [65.18456572421702]
  We propose to expose captured knowledge in the form of a directed acyclic causal graph. We also design this causal discovery process to be state-dependent, enabling it to model the dynamics in latent causal graphs. The proposed framework is composed of three parts: a dynamic causal discovery module, a causality encoding module, and a prediction module, and is trained in an end-to-end manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-30T20:59:42Z)
• Bayesian Reinforcement Learning with Limited Cognitive Load [43.19983737333797]
  Theory of adaptive behavior should account for complex interactions between an agent's learning history, decisions, and capacity constraints. Recent work in computer science has begun to clarify the principles that shape these dynamics by bridging ideas from reinforcement learning, Bayesian decision-making, and rate-distortion theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-05T03:29:34Z)
• Learning to Influence Human Behavior with Offline Reinforcement Learning [70.7884839812069]
  We focus on influence in settings where there is a need to capture human suboptimality. Experiments online with humans is potentially unsafe, and creating a high-fidelity simulator of the environment is often impractical. We show that offline reinforcement learning can learn to effectively influence suboptimal humans by extending and combining elements of observed human-human behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T23:41:55Z)
• The world seems different in a social context: a neural network analysis of human experimental data [57.729312306803955]
  We show that it is possible to replicate human behavioral data in both individual and social task settings by modifying the precision of prior and sensory signals. An analysis of the neural activation traces of the trained networks provides evidence that information is coded in fundamentally different ways in the network in the individual and in the social conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T17:19:12Z)
• Proposing an Interactive Audit Pipeline for Visual Privacy Research [0.0]
  We argue for the use of fairness to discover bias and fairness issues in systems, assert the need for a responsible human-over-the-loop, and reflect on the need to explore research agendas that have harmful societal impacts. Our goal is to provide a systematic analysis of the machine learning pipeline for visual privacy and bias issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-07T01:51:43Z)
• Biases in Data Science Lifecycle [0.0]
  The aim of this study is to provide a practical guideline to data scientists and increase their awareness. In this work, we reviewed different sources of biases and grouped them under different stages of the data science lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-10T13:41:48Z)
• Never Stop Learning: The Effectiveness of Fine-Tuning in Robotic Reinforcement Learning [109.77163932886413]
  We show how to adapt vision-based robotic manipulation policies to new variations by fine-tuning via off-policy reinforcement learning. This adaptation uses less than 0.2% of the data necessary to learn the task from scratch. We find that our approach of adapting pre-trained policies leads to substantial performance gains over the course of fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T17:57:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.