Cobblestone: Iterative Automation for Formal Verification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.19940v1
• Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 19:25:00 GMT
• Title: Cobblestone: Iterative Automation for Formal Verification
• Authors: Saketh Ram Kasibatla, Arpan Agarwal, Yuriy Brun, Sorin Lerner, Talia Ringer, Emily First,
• Abstract summary: Formal verification using proof assistants, such as Coq, is an effective way of improving software quality, but it is expensive. Recent research has used machine learning to automatically synthesize proofs, reducing verification effort, but these tools are able to prove only a fraction of the desired software properties. We introduce Cobblestone, a new proof-synthesis approach that improves on the state of the art by taking advantage of partial progress in proof synthesis attempts.
• Score: 11.445689801392657
• License:
• Abstract: Formal verification using proof assistants, such as Coq, is an effective way of improving software quality, but it is expensive. Writing proofs manually requires both significant effort and expertise. Recent research has used machine learning to automatically synthesize proofs, reducing verification effort, but these tools are able to prove only a fraction of the desired software properties. We introduce Cobblestone, a new proof-synthesis approach that improves on the state of the art by taking advantage of partial progress in proof synthesis attempts. Unlike prior tools, Cobblestone can produce multiple unsuccessful proofs using a large language model (LLM), identify the working portions of those proofs, and combine them into a single, successful proof, taking advantage of internal partial progress. We evaluate Cobblestone on two benchmarks of open-source Coq projects, controlling for training data leakage in LLM datasets. Fully automatically, Cobblestone can prove 48% of the theorems, while Proverbot9001, the previous state-of-the-art, learning-based, proof-synthesis tool, can prove 17%. Cobblestone establishes a new state of the art for fully automated proof synthesis tools for Coq. We also evaluate Cobblestone in a setting where it is given external partial proof progress from oracles, serving as proxies for a human proof engineer or another tool. When the theorem is broken down into a set of subgoals and Cobblestone is given a set of relevant lemmas already proven in the project, it can prove up to 58% of the theorems. We qualitatively study the theorems Cobblestone is and is not able to prove to outline potential future research directions to further improve proof synthesis, including developing interactive, semi-automated tools. Our research shows that tools can make better use of partial progress made during proof synthesis to more effectively automate formal verification.

Related papers

• Automated Proof Generation for Rust Code via Self-Evolution [69.25795662658356]
  We introduce SAFE, a novel framework that overcomes the lack of human-written proof to enable automated proof generation of Rust code. We demonstrate superior efficiency and precision compared to GPT-4o. This advancement leads to a significant improvement in performance, achieving a 70.50% accuracy rate in a benchmark crafted by human experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T08:15:45Z)
• QEDCartographer: Automating Formal Verification Using Reward-Free Reinforcement Learning [8.116854714039452]
  QEDCartographer is an automated proof-synthesis tool that combines supervised and reinforcement learning. We evaluate QEDCartographer using the CoqGym benchmark of 68.5K theorems from 124 open-source Coq projects. Our work demonstrates that reinforcement learning is a fruitful research direction for improving proof-synthesis tools' search mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-17T16:06:14Z)
• Enhancing Formal Theorem Proving: A Comprehensive Dataset for Training AI Models on Coq Code [0.0]
  The Coq proof assistant stands out for its rigorous approach to verifying mathematical assertions and software correctness. Despite the advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning, the specialized nature of Coq syntax and semantics poses unique challenges for Large Language Models (LLMs) This dataset, derived from a collection of over 10,000 Coq source files, encompasses a wide array of propositions, proofs, and definitions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T10:53:40Z)
• MUSTARD: Mastering Uniform Synthesis of Theorem and Proof Data [85.50740598523818]
  MUSTARD is a framework that masters uniform synthesis of theorem and proof data of high quality and diversity. We present a theorem-and-proof benchmark MUSTARDSAUCE with 5,866 valid data points. We perform extensive analysis and demonstrate that MUSTARD generates validated high-quality step-by-step data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T05:57:58Z)
• LeanDojo: Theorem Proving with Retrieval-Augmented Language Models [72.54339382005732]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in proving formal theorems using proof assistants such as Lean. Existing methods are difficult to reproduce or build on, due to private code, data, and compute requirements. This paper introduces LeanDojo: an open-source Lean toolkit consisting of toolkits, data, models. We develop ReProver: an LLM-based prover augmented with retrieval for selecting premises from a vast math library.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-27T17:05:32Z)
• Baldur: Whole-Proof Generation and Repair with Large Language Models [8.100054850290507]
  We use large language models, trained on natural language text and code and fine-tuned on proofs, to generate whole proofs for theorems at once. We combine this proof generation model with a fine-tuned repair model to repair generated proofs, further increasing proving power. We evaluate our method in a prototype, Baldur, and evaluate it on a benchmark of 6,336 Isabelle/HOL theorems and their proofs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-08T22:00:15Z)
• Generating Natural Language Proofs with Verifier-Guided Search [74.9614610172561]
  We present a novel stepwise method NLProofS (Natural Language Proof Search) NLProofS learns to generate relevant steps conditioning on the hypothesis. It achieves state-of-the-art performance on EntailmentBank and RuleTaker.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T02:22:30Z)
• Zero-shot Fact Verification by Claim Generation [85.27523983027471]
  We develop QACG, a framework for training a robust fact verification model. We use automatically generated claims that can be supported, refuted, or unverifiable from evidence from Wikipedia. In a zero-shot scenario, QACG improves a RoBERTa model's F1 from 50% to 77%, equivalent in performance to 2K+ manually-curated examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-31T03:13:52Z)
• PRover: Proof Generation for Interpretable Reasoning over Rules [81.40404921232192]
  We propose a transformer-based model that answers binary questions over rule-bases and generates the corresponding proofs. Our model learns to predict nodes and edges corresponding to proof graphs in an efficient constrained training paradigm. We conduct experiments on synthetic, hand-authored, and human-paraphrased rule-bases to show promising results for QA and proof generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-06T15:47:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.