Proportional Fairness in Non-Centroid Clustering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.23273v1
• Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:53:49 GMT
• Title: Proportional Fairness in Non-Centroid Clustering
• Authors: Ioannis Caragiannis, Evi Micha, Nisarg Shah,
• Abstract summary: We revisit the recently developed framework of proportionally fair clustering, where the goal is to provide group fairness guarantees. We expand the framework to non-centroid clustering, where the loss of an agent is a function of the other agents in its cluster. We show that the best approximation we are able to establish, using an adaptation of the GreedyCapture algorithm, is unappealing for a natural loss function.
• Score: 34.91134564352282
• License:
• Abstract: We revisit the recently developed framework of proportionally fair clustering, where the goal is to provide group fairness guarantees that become stronger for groups of data points (agents) that are large and cohesive. Prior work applies this framework to centroid clustering, where the loss of an agent is its distance to the centroid assigned to its cluster. We expand the framework to non-centroid clustering, where the loss of an agent is a function of the other agents in its cluster, by adapting two proportional fairness criteria -- the core and its relaxation, fully justified representation (FJR) -- to this setting. We show that the core can be approximated only under structured loss functions, and even then, the best approximation we are able to establish, using an adaptation of the GreedyCapture algorithm developed for centroid clustering [Chen et al., 2019; Micha and Shah, 2020], is unappealing for a natural loss function. In contrast, we design a new (inefficient) algorithm, GreedyCohesiveClustering, which achieves the relaxation FJR exactly under arbitrary loss functions, and show that the efficient GreedyCapture algorithm achieves a constant approximation of FJR. We also design an efficient auditing algorithm, which estimates the FJR approximation of any given clustering solution up to a constant factor. Our experiments on real data suggest that traditional clustering algorithms are highly unfair, whereas GreedyCapture is considerably fairer and incurs only a modest loss in common clustering objectives.

Related papers

• Self-Supervised Graph Embedding Clustering [70.36328717683297]
  K-means one-step dimensionality reduction clustering method has made some progress in addressing the curse of dimensionality in clustering tasks. We propose a unified framework that integrates manifold learning with K-means, resulting in the self-supervised graph embedding framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T08:59:51Z)
• Fuzzy K-Means Clustering without Cluster Centroids [21.256564324236333]
  Fuzzy K-Means clustering is a critical technique in unsupervised data analysis. This paper proposes a novel Fuzzy textitK-Means clustering algorithm that entirely eliminates the reliance on cluster centroids.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-07T12:25:03Z)
• Reinforcement Graph Clustering with Unknown Cluster Number [91.4861135742095]
  We propose a new deep graph clustering method termed Reinforcement Graph Clustering. In our proposed method, cluster number determination and unsupervised representation learning are unified into a uniform framework. In order to conduct feedback actions, the clustering-oriented reward function is proposed to enhance the cohesion of the same clusters and separate the different clusters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-13T18:12:28Z)
• Proportionally Representative Clustering [17.5359577544947]
  We propose a new axiom proportionally representative fairness'' (PRF) that is designed for clustering problems. Our fairness concept is not satisfied by existing fair clustering algorithms. Our algorithm for the unconstrained setting is also the first known-time approximation algorithm for the well-studied Proportional Fairness (PF) axiom.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-27T02:01:24Z)
• Cluster-level Group Representativity Fairness in $k$-means Clustering [3.420467786581458]
  Clustering algorithms could generate clusters such that different groups are disadvantaged within different clusters. We develop a clustering algorithm, building upon the centroid clustering paradigm pioneered by classical algorithms. We show that our method is effective in enhancing cluster-level group representativity fairness significantly at low impact on cluster coherence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-29T22:02:28Z)
• Fair Labeled Clustering [28.297893914525517]
  We consider the downstream application of clustering and how group fairness should be ensured for such a setting. We provide algorithms for such problems and show that in contrast to their NP-hard counterparts in group fair clustering, they permit efficient solutions. We also consider a well-motivated alternative setting where the decision-maker is free to assign labels to the clusters regardless of the centers' positions in the metric space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-28T07:07:12Z)
• Gradient Based Clustering [72.15857783681658]
  We propose a general approach for distance based clustering, using the gradient of the cost function that measures clustering quality. The approach is an iterative two step procedure (alternating between cluster assignment and cluster center updates) and is applicable to a wide range of functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-01T19:31:15Z)
• Meta Clustering Learning for Large-scale Unsupervised Person Re-identification [124.54749810371986]
  We propose a "small data for big task" paradigm dubbed Meta Clustering Learning (MCL) MCL only pseudo-labels a subset of the entire unlabeled data via clustering to save computing for the first-phase training. Our method significantly saves computational cost while achieving a comparable or even better performance compared to prior works.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-19T04:10:18Z)
• Towards Uncovering the Intrinsic Data Structures for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation using Structurally Regularized Deep Clustering [119.88565565454378]
  Unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) is to learn classification models that make predictions for unlabeled data on a target domain. We propose a hybrid model of Structurally Regularized Deep Clustering, which integrates the regularized discriminative clustering of target data with a generative one. Our proposed H-SRDC outperforms all the existing methods under both the inductive and transductive settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-08T08:52:00Z)
• (k, l)-Medians Clustering of Trajectories Using Continuous Dynamic Time Warping [57.316437798033974]
  In this work we consider the problem of center-based clustering of trajectories. We propose the usage of a continuous version of DTW as distance measure, which we call continuous dynamic time warping (CDTW) We show a practical way to compute a center from a set of trajectories and subsequently iteratively improve it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-01T13:17:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.