Repository-Level Compositional Code Translation and Validation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.24117v2
• Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 19:00:07 GMT
• Title: Repository-Level Compositional Code Translation and Validation
• Authors: Ali Reza Ibrahimzada, Kaiyao Ke, Mrigank Pawagi, Muhammad Salman Abid, Rangeet Pan, Saurabh Sinha, Reyhaneh Jabbarvand,
• Abstract summary: We propose AlphaTrans, a neuro-symbolic approach to automate repository-level code translation. We leveraged AlphaTrans to translate ten real-world open-source projects consisting of 836, 8575, 2719> classes, methods, and tests. 99.1% of the translated code fragments are syntactically correct, and AlphaTrans validates the translations' runtime behavior and functional correctness for 25.8%.
• Score: 5.269923665485903
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Code translation transforms programs from one programming language (PL) to another. Several rule-based transpilers have been designed to automate code translation between different pairs of PLs. However, the rules can become obsolete as the PLs evolve and cannot generalize to other PLs. Recent studies have explored the automation of code translation using Large Language Models (LLMs). One key observation is that such techniques may work well for crafted benchmarks but fail to generalize to the scale and complexity of real-world projects with dependencies, custom types, PL-specific features, etc. We propose AlphaTrans, a neuro-symbolic approach to automate repository-level code translation. AlphaTrans translates both source and test code, and employs multiple levels of validation to ensure the translation preserves the functionality of the source program. To break down the problem for LLMs, AlphaTrans leverages program analysis to decompose the program into fragments and translates them in the reverse call order. We leveraged AlphaTrans to translate ten real-world open-source projects consisting of <836, 8575, 2719> classes, methods, and tests. AlphaTrans translated the entire repository of these projects consisting of 6899 source code fragments. 99.1% of the translated code fragments are syntactically correct, and AlphaTrans validates the translations' runtime behavior and functional correctness for 25.8%. On average, the integrated translation and validation take 36 hours to translate a project, showing its scalability in practice. For the syntactically or semantically incorrect translations, AlphaTrans generates a report including existing translation, stack trace, test errors, or assertion failures. We provided these artifacts to two developers to fix the translation bugs in four projects. They were able to fix the issues in 20.1 hours on average and achieve all passing tests.

Related papers

• Lost in Literalism: How Supervised Training Shapes Translationese in LLMs [51.04435855143767]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in machine translation. However, translationese, characterized by overly literal and unnatural translations, remains a persistent challenge. We introduce methods to mitigate these biases, including polishing golden references and filtering unnatural training instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T12:14:45Z)
• Scalable, Validated Code Translation of Entire Projects using Large Language Models [13.059046327936393]
  Large language models (LLMs) show promise in code translation due to their ability to generate idiomatic code. Existing works have shown a drop in translation success rates for code exceeding around 100 lines. We develop a modular approach to translation, where we partition the code into small code fragments which can be independently translated. We show that we can consistently generate reliable Rust for projects up to 6,600 lines of code and 369 functions, with an average of 73% of functions successfully validated for I/O equivalence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-11T02:31:46Z)
• InterTrans: Leveraging Transitive Intermediate Translations to Enhance LLM-based Code Translation [9.655135415596414]
  Code translation aims to convert a program from one programming language (PL) to another. Recent studies show that even advanced techniques such as large language models (LLMs) still struggle with the task. We introduce InterTrans, an LLM-based automated code translation approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T22:31:32Z)
• Rectifier: Code Translation with Corrector via LLMs [11.38401806203093]
  We propose a general corrector, namely Rectifier, which is a micro and universal model for repairing translation errors. The experimental results on translation tasks between C++, Java, and Python show that our model has effective repair ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-10T08:58:41Z)
• Towards Translating Real-World Code with LLMs: A Study of Translating to Rust [13.743967357458287]
  Large language models (LLMs) show promise in code translation due to their ability to write code in most programming languages. We conduct our study on code extracted from real-world open source projects. FLOURINE is an end-to-end code translation tool that uses differential fuzzing to check if a Rust translation is I/O equivalent to the original source program.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-19T10:54:03Z)
• Exploring and Unleashing the Power of Large Language Models in Automated Code Translation [40.25727029618665]
  This paper investigates diverse LLMs and learning-based transpilers for automated code translation tasks. UniTrans is a Unified code Translation framework, applicable to various LLMs. Three recent LLMs of diverse sizes are tested with UniTrans, and all achieve substantial improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T00:49:46Z)
• Building Accurate Translation-Tailored LLMs with Language Aware Instruction Tuning [57.323716555996114]
  Off-target translation remains an unsolved problem, especially for low-resource languages. Recent works have either designed advanced prompting strategies to highlight the functionality of translation instructions or exploited the in-context learning ability of LLMs. In this work, we design a two-stage fine-tuning algorithm to improve the instruction-following ability (especially the translation direction) of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T13:47:40Z)
• IRCoder: Intermediate Representations Make Language Models Robust Multilingual Code Generators [49.903001442804594]
  This work investigates the prospect of leveraging compiler intermediate representations (IR) to improve the multilingual capabilities of Code-LMs. We first compile SLTrans, a parallel dataset consisting of nearly 4M self-contained source code files. Next, we carry out continued causal language modelling training on SLTrans, forcing the Code-LMs to learn the IR language. Our resulting models, dubbed IRCoder, display sizeable and consistent gains across a wide variety of code generation tasks and metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T17:52:08Z)
• A Novel Approach for Automatic Program Repair using Round-Trip Translation with Large Language Models [50.86686630756207]
  Research shows that grammatical mistakes in a sentence can be corrected by translating it to another language and back. Current generative models for Automatic Program Repair (APR) are pre-trained on source code and fine-tuned for repair. This paper proposes bypassing the fine-tuning step and using Round-Trip Translation (RTT): translation of code from one programming language to another programming or natural language, and back.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-15T22:36:31Z)
• Guess & Sketch: Language Model Guided Transpilation [59.02147255276078]
  Learned transpilation offers an alternative to manual re-writing and engineering efforts. Probabilistic neural language models (LMs) produce plausible outputs for every input, but do so at the cost of guaranteed correctness. Guess & Sketch extracts alignment and confidence information from features of the LM then passes it to a symbolic solver to resolve semantic equivalence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T15:42:18Z)
• Lost in Translation: A Study of Bugs Introduced by Large Language Models while Translating Code [5.915447908295047]
  We present a large-scale empirical study to investigate the ability of general LLMs and code LLMs for code translation. Our study involves the translation of 1,700 code samples from three benchmarks and two real-world projects. We find that correct translations range from 2.1% to 47.3% for the studied LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-06T13:33:13Z)
• ParroT: Translating during Chat using Large Language Models tuned with Human Translation and Feedback [90.20262941911027]
  ParroT is a framework to enhance and regulate the translation abilities during chat. Specifically, ParroT reformulates translation data into the instruction-following style. We propose three instruction types for finetuning ParroT models, including translation instruction, contrastive instruction, and error-guided instruction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-05T13:12:00Z)
• Zero-Shot Cross-lingual Semantic Parsing [56.95036511882921]
  We study cross-lingual semantic parsing as a zero-shot problem without parallel data for 7 test languages. We propose a multi-task encoder-decoder model to transfer parsing knowledge to additional languages using only English-Logical form paired data. Our system frames zero-shot parsing as a latent-space alignment problem and finds that pre-trained models can be improved to generate logical forms with minimal cross-lingual transfer penalty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-15T16:08:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.