LoRA-Contextualizing Adaptation of Large Multimodal Models for Long Document Understanding

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.01106v1
• Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2024 02:09:01 GMT
• Title: LoRA-Contextualizing Adaptation of Large Multimodal Models for Long Document Understanding
• Authors: Jian Chen, Ruiyi Zhang, Yufan Zhou, Tong Yu, Franck Dernoncourt, Jiuxiang Gu, Ryan A. Rossi, Changyou Chen, Tong Sun,
• Abstract summary: Large multimodal models (LMMs) have recently shown great progress in text-rich image understanding, yet they still struggle with complex, multi-page, visually-rich documents. We present a novel framework named LoRA-Contextualizing Adaptation of Large multimodal models (LoCAL) which broadens the capabilities of any LMM to support long-document understanding.
• Score: 103.69014172427026
• License:
• Abstract: Large multimodal models (LMMs) have recently shown great progress in text-rich image understanding, yet they still struggle with complex, multi-page, visually-rich documents. Traditional methods using document parsers for retrieval-augmented generation suffer from performance and efficiency limitations, while directly presenting all pages to LMMs leads to inefficiencies, especially with lengthy documents. In this work, we present a novel framework named LoRA-Contextualizing Adaptation of Large multimodal models (LoCAL), which broadens the capabilities of any LMM to support long-document understanding. We demonstrate that LMMs can effectively serve as multimodal retrievers, fetching relevant pages to answer user questions based on these pages. LoCAL is implemented with two specific LMM adapters: one for evidence page retrieval and another for question answering. Empirical results show state-of-the-art performance on public benchmarks, demonstrating the effectiveness of LoCAL.

Related papers

• M-Longdoc: A Benchmark For Multimodal Super-Long Document Understanding And A Retrieval-Aware Tuning Framework [75.95430061891828]
  We introduce M-LongDoc, a benchmark of 851 samples, and an automated framework to evaluate the performance of large multimodal models. We propose a retrieval-aware tuning approach for efficient and effective multimodal document reading.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-09T13:30:38Z)
• LLM$\times$MapReduce: Simplified Long-Sequence Processing using Large Language Models [73.13933847198395]
  We propose a training-free framework for processing long texts, utilizing a divide-and-conquer strategy to achieve comprehensive document understanding. The proposed LLM$times$MapReduce framework splits the entire document into several chunks for LLMs to read and then aggregates the intermediate answers to produce the final output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T03:13:44Z)
• Needle In A Multimodal Haystack [79.81804334634408]
  We present the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the capability of existing MLLMs to comprehend long multimodal documents. Our benchmark includes three types of evaluation tasks: multimodal retrieval, counting, and reasoning. We observe that existing models still have significant room for improvement on these tasks, especially on vision-centric evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T13:09:16Z)
• Enhancing Presentation Slide Generation by LLMs with a Multi-Staged End-to-End Approach [21.8104104944488]
  Existing approaches for generating a rich presentation from a document are often semi-automatic or only put a flat summary into the slides ignoring the importance of a good narrative. We propose a multi-staged end-to-end model which uses a combination of LLM and VLM. We have experimentally shown that compared to applying LLMs directly with state-of-the-art prompting, our proposed multi-staged solution is better in terms of automated metrics and human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-01T07:49:31Z)
• Exploring the Capabilities of Large Multimodal Models on Dense Text [58.82262549456294]
  We propose the DT-VQA dataset, with 170k question-answer pairs. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of GPT4V, Gemini, and various open-source LMMs. We find that even with automatically labeled training datasets, significant improvements in model performance can be achieved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T07:47:25Z)
• TextHawk: Exploring Efficient Fine-Grained Perception of Multimodal Large Language Models [9.232693392690702]
  TextHawk is a document-oriented Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) It is designed to explore efficient fine-grained perception by designing four dedicated components. We conduct extensive experiments on both general and document-oriented MLLM benchmarks, and show that TextHawk outperforms the state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-14T09:48:37Z)
• LAPDoc: Layout-Aware Prompting for Documents [3.523208537466128]
  We investigate the possibility to use purely text-based LLMs for document-specific tasks by using layout enrichment. Our results indicate that layout enrichment can improve the performance of purely text-based LLMs for document understanding by up to 15%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T10:00:49Z)
• An Empirical Study of Scaling Instruct-Tuned Large Multimodal Models [116.50367506746713]
  We present an empirical study of scaling LLaVA up to 33B and 65B/70B. We find that scaling LMM consistently enhances model performance and improves language capabilities. We hope that this study makes state-of-the-art LMM research at a larger scale more accessible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T17:30:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.