How To Discover Short, Shorter, and the Shortest Proofs of Unsatisfiability: A Branch-and-Bound Approach for Resolution Proof Length Minimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07955v1
• Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 17:31:35 GMT
• Title: How To Discover Short, Shorter, and the Shortest Proofs of Unsatisfiability: A Branch-and-Bound Approach for Resolution Proof Length Minimization
• Authors: Konstantin Sidorov, Koos van der Linden, Gonçalo Homem de Almeida Correia, Mathijs de Weerdt, Emir Demirović,
• Abstract summary: This paper proposes a novel branch-and-bound algorithm for finding the shortest resolution proofs. We show that this representation breaks all permutational symmetries, thereby improving upon the state-of-the-art symmetry-breaking. Our experiments suggest that the proofs from state-of-the-art solvers could be shortened by 30-60% on the instances from SAT Competition 2002 and by 25-50% on small synthetic formulas.
• Score: 1.4796543791607086
• License:
• Abstract: Modern software for propositional satisfiability problems gives a powerful automated reasoning toolkit, capable of outputting not only a satisfiable/unsatisfiable signal but also a justification of unsatisfiability in the form of resolution proof (or a more expressive proof), which is commonly used for verification purposes. Empirically, modern SAT solvers produce relatively short proofs, however, there are no inherent guarantees that these proofs cannot be significantly reduced. This paper proposes a novel branch-and-bound algorithm for finding the shortest resolution proofs; to this end, we introduce a layer list representation of proofs that groups clauses by their level of indirection. As we show, this representation breaks all permutational symmetries, thereby improving upon the state-of-the-art symmetry-breaking and informing the design of a novel workflow for proof minimization. In addition to that, we design pruning procedures that reason on proof length lower bound, clause subsumption, and dominance. Our experiments suggest that the proofs from state-of-the-art solvers could be shortened by 30-60% on the instances from SAT Competition 2002 and by 25-50% on small synthetic formulas. When treated as an algorithm for finding the shortest proof, our approach solves twice as many instances as the previous work based on SAT solving and reduces the time to optimality by orders of magnitude for the instances solved by both approaches.

Related papers

• ImProver: Agent-Based Automated Proof Optimization [18.315243539816464]
  We present ImProver, a large-language-model agent that rewrites proofs to optimize arbitrary user-defined metrics in Lean. We test ImProver on rewriting real-world undergraduate, competition, and research-level mathematics theorems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T05:14:18Z)
• Diagnosis via Proofs of Unsatisfiability for First-Order Logic with Relational Objects [1.6727186769396274]
  Satisfiability-based automated reasoning is successfully used in software engineering to validate complex software. We tackle the challenge of validating the correctness of FOL* unsatisfiability results. We develop a proof-based diagnosis to explain the cause of unsatisfiability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T22:25:58Z)
• Proving Theorems Recursively [80.42431358105482]
  We propose POETRY, which proves theorems in a level-by-level manner. Unlike previous step-by-step methods, POETRY searches for a sketch of the proof at each level. We observe a substantial increase in the maximum proof length found by POETRY, from 10 to 26.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T10:35:08Z)
• Forward LTLf Synthesis: DPLL At Work [1.370633147306388]
  We propose a new AND-OR graph search framework for synthesis of Linear Temporal Logic on finite traces (LTLf) Within such framework, we devise a procedure inspired by the Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland (DPLL) algorithm to generate the next available agent-environment moves. We also propose a novel equivalence check for search nodes based on syntactic equivalence of state formulas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-27T14:33:50Z)
• Generating Natural Language Proofs with Verifier-Guided Search [74.9614610172561]
  We present a novel stepwise method NLProofS (Natural Language Proof Search) NLProofS learns to generate relevant steps conditioning on the hypothesis. It achieves state-of-the-art performance on EntailmentBank and RuleTaker.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T02:22:30Z)
• Efficient Neural Network Analysis with Sum-of-Infeasibilities [64.31536828511021]
  Inspired by sum-of-infeasibilities methods in convex optimization, we propose a novel procedure for analyzing verification queries on networks with extensive branching functions. An extension to a canonical case-analysis-based complete search procedure can be achieved by replacing the convex procedure executed at each search state with DeepSoI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-19T15:05:09Z)
• Global Optimization of Objective Functions Represented by ReLU Networks [77.55969359556032]
  Neural networks can learn complex, non- adversarial functions, and it is challenging to guarantee their correct behavior in safety-critical contexts. Many approaches exist to find failures in networks (e.g., adversarial examples), but these cannot guarantee the absence of failures. We propose an approach that integrates the optimization process into the verification procedure, achieving better performance than the naive approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T08:19:48Z)
• From Checking to Inference: Actual Causality Computations as Optimization Problems [79.87179017975235]
  We present a novel approach to formulate different notions of causal reasoning, over binary acyclic models, as optimization problems. We show that both notions are efficiently automated. Using models with more than $8000$ variables, checking is computed in a matter of seconds, with MaxSAT outperforming ILP in many cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-05T10:56:52Z)
• Understanding the QuickXPlain Algorithm: Simple Explanation and Formal Proof [0.0]
  This paper presents a proof of correctness of Ulrich Junker's QuickXPlain algorithm. It can be used as a guidance for proving other algorithms. It also provides the possibility of providing "gapless" correctness of systems that rely on results computed by QuickXPlain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-07T01:37:41Z)
• The Simulator: Understanding Adaptive Sampling in the Moderate-Confidence Regime [52.38455827779212]
  We propose a novel technique for analyzing adaptive sampling called the em Simulator. We prove the first instance-based lower bounds the top-k problem which incorporate the appropriate log-factors. Our new analysis inspires a simple and near-optimal for the best-arm and top-k identification, the first em practical of its kind for the latter problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2017-02-16T23:42:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.