Scaling Law for Post-training after Model Pruning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.10272v1
• Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 15:28:42 GMT
• Title: Scaling Law for Post-training after Model Pruning
• Authors: Xiaodong Chen, Yuxuan Hu, Jing Zhang, Xiaokang Zhang, Cuiping Li, Hong Chen,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) based on the Transformer architecture are widely employed across various domains and tasks. To mitigate this, model pruning techniques have been developed to create more efficient models while maintaining high performance. This paper investigates the post-training requirements of pruned LLMs and introduces a scaling law to determine the optimal amount of post-training data.
• Score: 24.9935656519956
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) based on the Transformer architecture are widely employed across various domains and tasks. However, their increasing size imposes significant hardware demands, limiting practical deployment. To mitigate this, model pruning techniques have been developed to create more efficient models while maintaining high performance. Despite this, post-training after pruning is crucial for performance recovery and can be resource-intensive. This paper investigates the post-training requirements of pruned LLMs and introduces a scaling law to determine the optimal amount of post-training data. Post-training experiments with the Llama-3 and Qwen-2.5 series models, pruned using depth pruning, width pruning, and 2:4 semi-structured pruning, show that higher pruning ratios necessitate more post-training data for performance recovery, whereas larger LLMs require less. The proposed scaling law predicts a model's loss based on its parameter counts before and after pruning, as well as the post-training token counts. Furthermore, we find that the scaling law established from smaller LLMs can be reliably extrapolated to larger LLMs. This work provides valuable insights into the post-training of pruned LLMs and offers a practical scaling law for optimizing post-training data usage.

Related papers

• The Journey Matters: Average Parameter Count over Pre-training Unifies Sparse and Dense Scaling Laws [51.608402959163925]
  We present the first systematic exploration of optimal sparse pre-training configurations for large language models. We find that initiating pruning at 25% of total training compute and concluding at 75% achieves near-optimal final evaluation loss. We propose a new scaling law that modifies the Chinchilla scaling law to use the average parameter count over pre-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-21T20:23:22Z)
• Scaling Laws for Precision [73.24325358259753]
  We devise "precision-aware" scaling laws for both training and inference. For inference, we find that the degradation introduced by post-training quantization increases as models are trained on more data. For training, our scaling laws allow us to predict the loss of a model with different parts in different precisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T00:10:10Z)
• Pruning Foundation Models for High Accuracy without Retraining [48.256389781305415]
  It is challenging to deploy foundation models or large language models (LLMs) due to their massive parameters and computations. Post-training pruning methods are proposed to prune LLMs in one-shot without retraining. Our experiments demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed methods in comparison to SOTA baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T01:23:34Z)
• A Hitchhiker's Guide to Scaling Law Estimation [56.06982415792523]
  Scaling laws predict the loss of a target machine learning model by extrapolating from easier-to-train models with fewer parameters or smaller training sets. We estimate more than 1000 scaling laws, then derive a set of best practices for estimating scaling laws in new model families.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T17:59:10Z)
• Bypass Back-propagation: Optimization-based Structural Pruning for Large Language Models via Policy Gradient [57.9629676017527]
  We propose an optimization-based structural pruning on Large-Language Models. We learn the pruning masks in a probabilistic space directly by optimizing the loss of the pruned model. Our method operates for 2.7 hours with around 35GB memory for the 13B models on a single A100 GPU.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-15T09:31:03Z)
• More Compute Is What You Need [3.184416958830696]
  We propose a new scaling law that suggests model performance depends mostly on the amount of compute spent for transformer-based models. We predict that (a) for inference efficiency, training should prioritize smaller model sizes and larger training datasets, and (b) assuming the exhaustion of available web datasets, scaling the model size might be the only way to further improve model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T12:05:48Z)
• Language models scale reliably with over-training and on downstream tasks [121.69867718185125]
  Scaling laws are useful guides for derisking expensive training runs. However, there remain gaps between current studies and how language models are trained. In contrast, scaling laws mostly predict loss on inference, but models are usually compared on downstream task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T13:54:00Z)
• Shortened LLaMA: Depth Pruning for Large Language Models with Comparison of Retraining Methods [5.135352292810664]
  We show that simple depth pruning can effectively compress large language models (LLMs) Our pruning method boosts inference speeds, especially under memory-constrained conditions. We hope this work can help build compact yet capable LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T09:44:49Z)
• A Dynamical Model of Neural Scaling Laws [79.59705237659547]
  We analyze a random feature model trained with gradient descent as a solvable model of network training and generalization. Our theory shows how the gap between training and test loss can gradually build up over time due to repeated reuse of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T01:41:38Z)
• Dynamic Sparse No Training: Training-Free Fine-tuning for Sparse LLMs [67.38165028487242]
  We introduce Dynamic Sparse No Training (DSnoT), a training-free fine-tuning approach to fine-tune large language models (LLMs) Inspired by the Dynamic Sparse Training, DSnoT minimizes the reconstruction error between the dense and sparse LLMs. Our paper offers fresh insights into how to fine-tune sparse LLMs in an efficient training-free manner and open new venues to scale the great potential of sparsity to LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T07:38:52Z)
• Sheared LLaMA: Accelerating Language Model Pre-training via Structured Pruning [52.29522018586365]
  We study structured pruning as an effective means to develop smaller LLMs from pre-trained, larger models. Our approach employs two key techniques: (1) targeted structured pruning, which prunes a larger model to a specified target shape by removing layers, heads, and intermediate and hidden dimensions in an end-to-end manner, and (2) dynamic batch loading, which dynamically updates the composition of sampled data in each training batch based on varying losses across different domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T15:13:30Z)
• LoRAPrune: Structured Pruning Meets Low-Rank Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning [56.88751562302793]
  Low-rank adaption (LoRA) has emerged to fine-tune large language models (LLMs) LoRAPrune is a new framework that delivers an accurate structured pruned model in a highly memory-efficient manner. LoRAPrune achieves a reduction in perplexity by 4.81 on WikiText2 and 3.46 on PTB, while also decreasing memory usage by 52.6%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-28T15:15:48Z)
• LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Models [65.02607075556742]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in language understanding and generation. We tackle the compression of LLMs within the bound of two constraints: being task-agnostic and minimizing the reliance on the original training dataset. Our method, named LLM-Pruner, adopts structural pruning that selectively removes non-critical coupled structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T12:10:53Z)
• SPDF: Sparse Pre-training and Dense Fine-tuning for Large Language Models [4.114555639014612]
  We show the benefits of using unstructured weight sparsity to train only a subset of weights during pre-training. We demonstrate that we can induce up to 75% sparsity into a 1.3B parameter GPT-3 XL model resulting in a 2.5x reduction in pre-training FLOPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-18T17:56:01Z)
• Same Pre-training Loss, Better Downstream: Implicit Bias Matters for Language Models [46.24479693469042]
  This paper shows that 1) pre-training loss cannot fully explain downstream performance and 2) flatness of the model is well-correlated with downstream performance where pre-training loss is not.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T17:45:36Z)
• bert2BERT: Towards Reusable Pretrained Language Models [51.078081486422896]
  We propose bert2BERT, which can effectively transfer the knowledge of an existing smaller pre-trained model to a large model. bert2BERT saves about 45% and 47% computational cost of pre-training BERT_BASE and GPT_BASE by reusing the models of almost their half sizes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-14T04:05:25Z)
• Scaling Laws for Acoustic Models [7.906034575114518]
  Recent work has shown that autoregressive generative models with cross-entropy objective functions exhibit smooth power-law relationships. We show that acoustic models trained with an auto-predictive coding loss behave as if they are subject to similar scaling laws.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-11T18:59:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.