PhDGPT: Introducing a psychometric and linguistic dataset about how large language models perceive graduate students and professors in psychology
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.10473v1
- Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2024 20:04:20 GMT
- Title: PhDGPT: Introducing a psychometric and linguistic dataset about how large language models perceive graduate students and professors in psychology
- Authors: Edoardo Sebastiano De Duro, Enrique Taietta, Riccardo Improta, Massimo Stella,
- Abstract summary: This work introduces PhDGPT, a prompting framework and synthetic dataset that encapsulates the machine psychology of PhD researchers and professors.
The dataset consists of 756,000 datapoints, counting 300 iterations repeated across 15 academic events, 2 biological genders, 2 career levels and 42 unique item responses of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-42)
By combining network psychometrics and psycholinguistic dimensions, this study identifies several similarities and distinctions between human and LLM data.
- Score: 0.3749861135832073
- License:
- Abstract: Machine psychology aims to reconstruct the mindset of Large Language Models (LLMs), i.e. how these artificial intelligences perceive and associate ideas. This work introduces PhDGPT, a prompting framework and synthetic dataset that encapsulates the machine psychology of PhD researchers and professors as perceived by OpenAI's GPT-3.5. The dataset consists of 756,000 datapoints, counting 300 iterations repeated across 15 academic events, 2 biological genders, 2 career levels and 42 unique item responses of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-42). PhDGPT integrates these psychometric scores with their explanations in plain language. This synergy of scores and texts offers a dual, comprehensive perspective on the emotional well-being of simulated academics, e.g. male/female PhD students or professors. By combining network psychometrics and psycholinguistic dimensions, this study identifies several similarities and distinctions between human and LLM data. The psychometric networks of simulated male professors do not differ between physical and emotional anxiety subscales, unlike humans. Other LLMs' personification can reconstruct human DASS factors with a purity up to 80%. Furthemore, LLM-generated personifications across different scenarios are found to elicit explanations lower in concreteness and imageability in items coding for anxiety, in agreement with past studies about human psychology. Our findings indicate an advanced yet incomplete ability for LLMs to reproduce the complexity of human psychometric data, unveiling convenient advantages and limitations in using LLMs to replace human participants. PhDGPT also intriguingly capture the ability for LLMs to adapt and change language patterns according to prompted mental distress contextual features, opening new quantitative opportunities for assessing the machine psychology of these artificial intelligences.
Related papers
- Mind Scramble: Unveiling Large Language Model Psychology Via Typoglycemia [27.650551131885152]
Research into large language models (LLMs) has shown promise in addressing complex tasks in the physical world.
Studies suggest that powerful LLMs, like GPT-4, are beginning to exhibit human-like cognitive abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-02T15:47:25Z) - Psychomatics -- A Multidisciplinary Framework for Understanding Artificial Minds [0.319565400223685]
This paper introduces Psychomatics, a framework bridging cognitive science, linguistics, and computer science.
It aims to better understand the high-level functioning of LLMs.
Psychomatics holds the potential to yield transformative insights into the nature of language, cognition, and intelligence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-23T12:53:41Z) - Quantifying AI Psychology: A Psychometrics Benchmark for Large Language Models [57.518784855080334]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional task-solving capabilities, increasingly adopting roles akin to human-like assistants.
This paper presents a framework for investigating psychology dimension in LLMs, including psychological identification, assessment dataset curation, and assessment with results validation.
We introduce a comprehensive psychometrics benchmark for LLMs that covers six psychological dimensions: personality, values, emotion, theory of mind, motivation, and intelligence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-25T16:09:08Z) - Measuring Psychological Depth in Language Models [50.48914935872879]
We introduce the Psychological Depth Scale (PDS), a novel framework rooted in literary theory that measures an LLM's ability to produce authentic and narratively complex stories.
We empirically validate our framework by showing that humans can consistently evaluate stories based on PDS (0.72 Krippendorff's alpha)
Surprisingly, GPT-4 stories either surpassed or were statistically indistinguishable from highly-rated human-written stories sourced from Reddit.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-18T14:51:54Z) - Limited Ability of LLMs to Simulate Human Psychological Behaviours: a Psychometric Analysis [0.27309692684728604]
We prompt OpenAI's flagship models, GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, to assume different personas and respond to a range of standardized measures of personality constructs.
We found that the responses from GPT-4, but not GPT-3.5, using generic persona descriptions show promising, albeit not perfect, psychometric properties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-12T10:52:15Z) - PsychoGAT: A Novel Psychological Measurement Paradigm through Interactive Fiction Games with LLM Agents [68.50571379012621]
Psychological measurement is essential for mental health, self-understanding, and personal development.
PsychoGAT (Psychological Game AgenTs) achieves statistically significant excellence in psychometric metrics such as reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-19T18:00:30Z) - PsyCoT: Psychological Questionnaire as Powerful Chain-of-Thought for
Personality Detection [50.66968526809069]
We propose a novel personality detection method, called PsyCoT, which mimics the way individuals complete psychological questionnaires in a multi-turn dialogue manner.
Our experiments demonstrate that PsyCoT significantly improves the performance and robustness of GPT-3.5 in personality detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-31T08:23:33Z) - Large Language Models Can Infer Psychological Dispositions of Social Media Users [1.0923877073891446]
We test whether GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 can derive the Big Five personality traits from users' Facebook status updates in a zero-shot learning scenario.
Our results show an average correlation of r =.29 (range = [.22,.33]) between LLM-inferred and self-reported trait scores.
predictions were found to be more accurate for women and younger individuals on several traits, suggesting a potential bias stemming from the underlying training data or differences in online self-expression.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-13T01:27:48Z) - Unleashing the Emergent Cognitive Synergy in Large Language Models: A Task-Solving Agent through Multi-Persona Self-Collaboration [116.09561564489799]
Solo Performance Prompting transforms a single LLM into a cognitive synergist by engaging in multi-turn self-collaboration with multiple personas.
A cognitive synergist is an intelligent agent that collaboratively combines multiple minds' strengths and knowledge to enhance problem-solving in complex tasks.
Our in-depth analysis shows that assigning multiple fine-grained personas in LLMs improves problem-solving abilities compared to using a single or fixed number of personas.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-11T14:45:19Z) - Evaluating and Inducing Personality in Pre-trained Language Models [78.19379997967191]
We draw inspiration from psychometric studies by leveraging human personality theory as a tool for studying machine behaviors.
To answer these questions, we introduce the Machine Personality Inventory (MPI) tool for studying machine behaviors.
MPI follows standardized personality tests, built upon the Big Five Personality Factors (Big Five) theory and personality assessment inventories.
We devise a Personality Prompting (P2) method to induce LLMs with specific personalities in a controllable way.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-20T07:32:57Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.