Politicians vs ChatGPT. A study of presuppositions in French and Italian political communication

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.18403v1
• Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 14:46:41 GMT
• Title: Politicians vs ChatGPT. A study of presuppositions in French and Italian political communication
• Authors: Davide Garassino, Vivana Masia, Nicola Brocca, Alice Delorme Benites,
• Abstract summary: This study focuses on implicit communication, in particular on presuppositions and their functions in discourse.<n>This study also aims to contribute to the emerging literature on the pragmatic competences of Large Language Models.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper aims to provide a comparison between texts produced by French and Italian politicians on polarizing issues, such as immigration and the European Union, and their chatbot counterparts created with ChatGPT 3.5. In this study, we focus on implicit communication, in particular on presuppositions and their functions in discourse, which have been considered in the literature as a potential linguistic feature of manipulation. This study also aims to contribute to the emerging literature on the pragmatic competences of Large Language Models.

Related papers

• Language-Dependent Political Bias in AI: A Study of ChatGPT and Gemini [0.0]
  This study investigates the political tendency of large language models and the existence of differentiation according to the query language. ChatGPT and Gemini were subjected to a political axis test using 14 different languages. A comparative analysis revealed that Gemini exhibited a more pronounced liberal and left-wing tendency compared to ChatGPT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-08T21:13:01Z)
• ChatGPT for President! Presupposed content in politicians versus GPT-generated texts [0.0]
  This study examines ChatGPT-4's capability to replicate linguistic strategies used in political discourse. Using a corpus-based pragmatic analysis, this study assesses how well ChatGPT can mimic these persuasive strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T07:48:04Z)
• Llama meets EU: Investigating the European Political Spectrum through the Lens of LLMs [18.836470390824633]
  We audit Llama Chat in the context of EU politics to analyze the model's political knowledge and its ability to reason in context. We adapt, i.e., further fine-tune, Llama Chat on speeches of individual euro-parties from debates in the European Parliament to reevaluate its political leaning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T13:42:57Z)
• Language Models: A Guide for the Perplexed [51.88841610098437]
  This tutorial aims to help narrow the gap between those who study language models and those who are intrigued and want to learn more. We offer a scientific viewpoint that focuses on questions amenable to study through experimentation. We situate language models as they are today in the context of the research that led to their development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-29T01:19:02Z)
• Neural Conversation Models and How to Rein Them in: A Survey of Failures and Fixes [17.489075240435348]
  Recent conditional language models are able to continue any kind of text source in an often seemingly fluent way. From a linguistic perspective, contributing to a conversation is high. Recent approaches try to tame the underlying language models at various intervention points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-11T12:07:45Z)
• BabySLM: language-acquisition-friendly benchmark of self-supervised spoken language models [56.93604813379634]
  Self-supervised techniques for learning speech representations have been shown to develop linguistic competence from exposure to speech without the need for human labels. We propose a language-acquisition-friendly benchmark to probe spoken language models at the lexical and syntactic levels. We highlight two exciting challenges that need to be addressed for further progress: bridging the gap between text and speech and between clean speech and in-the-wild speech.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-02T12:54:38Z)
• Natural Language Decompositions of Implicit Content Enable Better Text Representations [52.992875653864076]
  We introduce a method for the analysis of text that takes implicitly communicated content explicitly into account. We use a large language model to produce sets of propositions that are inferentially related to the text that has been observed. Our results suggest that modeling the meanings behind observed language, rather than the literal text alone, is a valuable direction for NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T23:45:20Z)
• ChatGPT Beyond English: Towards a Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models in Multilingual Learning [70.57126720079971]
  Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as the most important breakthroughs in natural language processing (NLP) This paper evaluates ChatGPT on 7 different tasks, covering 37 diverse languages with high, medium, low, and extremely low resources. Compared to the performance of previous models, our extensive experimental results demonstrate a worse performance of ChatGPT for different NLP tasks and languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-12T05:08:52Z)
• ChatGPT and a New Academic Reality: Artificial Intelligence-Written Research Papers and the Ethics of the Large Language Models in Scholarly Publishing [6.109522330180625]
  ChatGPT is a generative pre-trained transformer, which uses natural language processing to fulfill text-based user requests. Potential ethical issues that could arise with the emergence of large language models like GPT-3 are discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-21T14:35:07Z)
• An Inclusive Notion of Text [69.36678873492373]
  We argue that clarity on the notion of text is crucial for reproducible and generalizable NLP. We introduce a two-tier taxonomy of linguistic and non-linguistic elements that are available in textual sources and can be used in NLP modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-10T14:26:43Z)
• Testing the Ability of Language Models to Interpret Figurative Language [69.59943454934799]
  Figurative and metaphorical language are commonplace in discourse. It remains an open question to what extent modern language models can interpret nonliteral phrases. We introduce Fig-QA, a Winograd-style nonliteral language understanding task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T23:42:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.