Who Speaks Next? Multi-party AI Discussion Leveraging the Systematics of Turn-taking in Murder Mystery Games

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04937v1
• Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2024 10:45:54 GMT
• Title: Who Speaks Next? Multi-party AI Discussion Leveraging the Systematics of Turn-taking in Murder Mystery Games
• Authors: Ryota Nonomura, Hiroki Mori,
• Abstract summary: This study focuses on conversational norms such as adjacency pairs and turn-taking found in conversation analysis. We propose a new framework called "Murder Mystery Agents" that applies these norms to AI agents' dialogue control. The proposed framework integrates next speaker selection based on adjacency pairs and a self-selection mechanism.
• Score: 7.946510318969307
• License:
• Abstract: Multi-agent systems utilizing large language models (LLMs) have shown great promise in achieving natural dialogue. However, smooth dialogue control and autonomous decision making among agents still remain challenges. In this study, we focus on conversational norms such as adjacency pairs and turn-taking found in conversation analysis and propose a new framework called "Murder Mystery Agents" that applies these norms to AI agents' dialogue control. As an evaluation target, we employed the "Murder Mystery" game, a reasoning-type table-top role-playing game that requires complex social reasoning and information manipulation. In this game, players need to unravel the truth of the case based on fragmentary information through cooperation and bargaining. The proposed framework integrates next speaker selection based on adjacency pairs and a self-selection mechanism that takes agents' internal states into account to achieve more natural and strategic dialogue. To verify the effectiveness of this new approach, we analyzed utterances that led to dialogue breakdowns and conducted automatic evaluation using LLMs, as well as human evaluation using evaluation criteria developed for the Murder Mystery game. Experimental results showed that the implementation of the next speaker selection mechanism significantly reduced dialogue breakdowns and improved the ability of agents to share information and perform logical reasoning. The results of this study demonstrate that the systematics of turn-taking in human conversation are also effective in controlling dialogue among AI agents, and provide design guidelines for more advanced multi-agent dialogue systems.

Related papers

• Interactive Dialogue Agents via Reinforcement Learning on Hindsight Regenerations [58.65755268815283]
  Many real dialogues are interactive, meaning an agent's utterances will influence their conversational partner, elicit information, or change their opinion. We use this fact to rewrite and augment existing suboptimal data, and train via offline reinforcement learning (RL) an agent that outperforms both prompting and learning from unaltered human demonstrations. Our results in a user study with real humans show that our approach greatly outperforms existing state-of-the-art dialogue agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T21:37:51Z)
• Self-Explanation Prompting Improves Dialogue Understanding in Large Language Models [52.24756457516834]
  We propose a novel "Self-Explanation" prompting strategy to enhance the comprehension abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) This task-agnostic approach requires the model to analyze each dialogue utterance before task execution, thereby improving performance across various dialogue-centric tasks. Experimental results from six benchmark datasets confirm that our method consistently outperforms other zero-shot prompts and matches or exceeds the efficacy of few-shot prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-22T15:41:34Z)
• JoTR: A Joint Transformer and Reinforcement Learning Framework for Dialog Policy Learning [53.83063435640911]
  Dialogue policy learning (DPL) is a crucial component of dialogue modelling. We introduce a novel framework, JoTR, to generate flexible dialogue actions. Unlike traditional methods, JoTR formulates a word-level policy that allows for a more dynamic and adaptable dialogue action generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-01T03:19:53Z)
• Dialogue Agents 101: A Beginner's Guide to Critical Ingredients for Designing Effective Conversational Systems [29.394466123216258]
  This study provides a comprehensive overview of the primary characteristics of a dialogue agent, their corresponding open-domain datasets, and the methods used to benchmark these datasets. We propose UNIT, a UNified dIalogue dataseT constructed from conversations of existing datasets for different dialogue tasks capturing the nuances for each of them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-14T10:05:47Z)
• Prompting and Evaluating Large Language Models for Proactive Dialogues: Clarification, Target-guided, and Non-collaboration [72.04629217161656]
  This work focuses on three aspects of proactive dialogue systems: clarification, target-guided, and non-collaborative dialogues. To trigger the proactivity of LLMs, we propose the Proactive Chain-of-Thought prompting scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T02:49:35Z)
• Controllable Mixed-Initiative Dialogue Generation through Prompting [50.03458333265885]
  Mixed-initiative dialogue tasks involve repeated exchanges of information and conversational control. Agents gain control by generating responses that follow particular dialogue intents or strategies, prescribed by a policy planner. Standard approach has been fine-tuning pre-trained language models to perform generation conditioned on these intents. We instead prompt large language models as a drop-in replacement to fine-tuning on conditional generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-06T23:11:25Z)
• Target-Guided Dialogue Response Generation Using Commonsense and Data Augmentation [32.764356638437214]
  We introduce a new technique for target-guided response generation. We also propose techniques to re-purpose existing dialogue datasets for target-guided generation. Our work generally enables dialogue system designers to exercise more control over the conversations that their systems produce.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T04:01:40Z)
• Filling the Gap of Utterance-aware and Speaker-aware Representation for Multi-turn Dialogue [76.88174667929665]
  A multi-turn dialogue is composed of multiple utterances from two or more different speaker roles. In the existing retrieval-based multi-turn dialogue modeling, the pre-trained language models (PrLMs) as encoder represent the dialogues coarsely. We propose a novel model to fill such a gap by modeling the effective utterance-aware and speaker-aware representations entailed in a dialogue history.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-14T15:07:19Z)
• Contextual Dialogue Act Classification for Open-Domain Conversational Agents [10.576497782941697]
  Classifying the general intent of the user utterance in a conversation, also known as Dialogue Act (DA), is a key step in Natural Language Understanding (NLU) for conversational agents. We propose CDAC (Contextual Dialogue Act), a simple yet effective deep learning approach for contextual dialogue act classification. We use transfer learning to adapt models trained on human-human conversations to predict dialogue acts in human-machine dialogues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-28T06:48:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.