SafeWorld: Geo-Diverse Safety Alignment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.06483v1
• Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 13:31:46 GMT
• Title: SafeWorld: Geo-Diverse Safety Alignment
• Authors: Da Yin, Haoyi Qiu, Kung-Hsiang Huang, Kai-Wei Chang, Nanyun Peng,
• Abstract summary: We introduce SafeWorld, a novel benchmark specifically designed to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) SafeWorld encompasses 2,342 test user queries, each grounded in high-quality, human-verified cultural norms and legal policies from 50 countries and 493 regions/races. Our trained SafeWorldLM outperforms all competing models, including GPT-4o on all three evaluation dimensions by a large margin.
• Score: 107.84182558480859
• License:
• Abstract: In the rapidly evolving field of Large Language Models (LLMs), ensuring safety is a crucial and widely discussed topic. However, existing works often overlook the geo-diversity of cultural and legal standards across the world. To demonstrate the challenges posed by geo-diverse safety standards, we introduce SafeWorld, a novel benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LLMs' ability to generate responses that are not only helpful but also culturally sensitive and legally compliant across diverse global contexts. SafeWorld encompasses 2,342 test user queries, each grounded in high-quality, human-verified cultural norms and legal policies from 50 countries and 493 regions/races. On top of it, we propose a multi-dimensional automatic safety evaluation framework that assesses the contextual appropriateness, accuracy, and comprehensiveness of responses. Our evaluations reveal that current LLMs struggle to meet these criteria. To enhance LLMs' alignment with geo-diverse safety standards, we synthesize helpful preference pairs for Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) alignment training. The preference pair construction aims to encourage LLMs to behave appropriately and provide precise references to relevant cultural norms and policies when necessary. Our trained SafeWorldLM outperforms all competing models, including GPT-4o on all three evaluation dimensions by a large margin. Global human evaluators also note a nearly 20% higher winning rate in helpfulness and harmfulness evaluation. Our code and data can be found here: https://github.com/PlusLabNLP/SafeWorld.

Related papers

• Large Language Model Safety: A Holistic Survey [35.42419096859496]
  The rapid development and deployment of large language models (LLMs) have introduced a new frontier in artificial intelligence. This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the current landscape of LLM safety, covering four major categories: value misalignment, robustness to adversarial attacks, misuse, and autonomous AI risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-23T16:11:27Z)
• CFSafety: Comprehensive Fine-grained Safety Assessment for LLMs [4.441767341563709]
  We introduce a safety assessment benchmark, CFSafety, which integrates 5 classic safety scenarios and 5 types of instruction attacks, totaling 10 categories of safety questions. This test set was used to evaluate the natural language generation capabilities of large language models (LLMs) The results indicate that while GPT-4 demonstrated superior safety performance, the safety effectiveness of LLMs, including this model, still requires improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T03:25:20Z)
• Arabic Dataset for LLM Safeguard Evaluation [62.96160492994489]
  This study explores the safety of large language models (LLMs) in Arabic with its linguistic and cultural complexities. We present an Arab-region-specific safety evaluation dataset consisting of 5,799 questions, including direct attacks, indirect attacks, and harmless requests with sensitive words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T14:12:43Z)
• SORRY-Bench: Systematically Evaluating Large Language Model Safety Refusal Behaviors [64.9938658716425]
  Existing evaluations of large language models' (LLMs) ability to recognize and reject unsafe user requests face three limitations. First, existing methods often use coarse-grained of unsafe topics, and are over-representing some fine-grained topics. Second, linguistic characteristics and formatting of prompts are often overlooked, like different languages, dialects, and more -- which are only implicitly considered in many evaluations. Third, existing evaluations rely on large LLMs for evaluation, which can be expensive.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T17:56:07Z)
• ALERT: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Safety through Red Teaming [64.86326523181553]
  ALERT is a large-scale benchmark to assess safety based on a novel fine-grained risk taxonomy. It aims to identify vulnerabilities, inform improvements, and enhance the overall safety of the language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-06T15:01:47Z)
• SALAD-Bench: A Hierarchical and Comprehensive Safety Benchmark for Large Language Models [107.82336341926134]
  SALAD-Bench is a safety benchmark specifically designed for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) It transcends conventional benchmarks through its large scale, rich diversity, intricate taxonomy spanning three levels, and versatile functionalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T17:33:54Z)
• Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models [51.83369778259149]
  Large language models (LLMs) may generate insulting and discriminatory content, reflect incorrect social values, and may be used for malicious purposes. To promote the deployment of safe, responsible, and ethical AI, we release SafetyPrompts including 100k augmented prompts and responses by LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T16:27:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.