How Does the Smoothness Approximation Method Facilitate Generalization for Federated Adversarial Learning?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.08282v2
• Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 06:35:21 GMT
• Title: How Does the Smoothness Approximation Method Facilitate Generalization for Federated Adversarial Learning?
• Authors: Wenjun Ding, Ying An, Lixing Chen, Shichao Kan, Fan Wu, Zhe Qu,
• Abstract summary: Generalization is crucial for evaluating algorithm performance on unseen data.<n>We develop algorithm stability measures to evaluate the generalization performance of two popular FAL algorithms.<n>We identify RSA as the most effective method for reducing generalization error.
• Score: 15.082409524352316
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Federated Adversarial Learning (FAL) is a robust framework for resisting adversarial attacks on federated learning. Although some FAL studies have developed efficient algorithms, they primarily focus on convergence performance and overlook generalization. Generalization is crucial for evaluating algorithm performance on unseen data. However, generalization analysis is more challenging due to non-smooth adversarial loss functions. A common approach to addressing this issue is to leverage smoothness approximation. In this paper, we develop algorithm stability measures to evaluate the generalization performance of two popular FAL algorithms: \textit{Vanilla FAL (VFAL)} and {\it Slack FAL (SFAL)}, using three different smooth approximation methods: 1) \textit{Surrogate Smoothness Approximation (SSA)}, (2) \textit{Randomized Smoothness Approximation (RSA)}, and (3) \textit{Over-Parameterized Smoothness Approximation (OPSA)}. Based on our in-depth analysis, we answer the question of how to properly set the smoothness approximation method to mitigate generalization error in FAL. Moreover, we identify RSA as the most effective method for reducing generalization error. In highly data-heterogeneous scenarios, we also recommend employing SFAL to mitigate the deterioration of generalization performance caused by heterogeneity. Based on our theoretical results, we provide insights to help develop more efficient FAL algorithms, such as designing new metrics and dynamic aggregation rules to mitigate heterogeneity.

Related papers

• SALSA: Sequential Approximate Leverage-Score Algorithm with Application in Analyzing Big Time Series Data [46.42365692992566]
  We develop a new efficient sequential approximate leverage score algorithm, SALSA, using methods from randomized numerical linear algebra. We show that the theoretical computational complexity and numerical accuracy of SALSA surpass existing approximations. Our proposed algorithm is, with high probability, guaranteed to find the maximum likelihood estimates of the parameters for the true underlying ARMA model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-30T02:36:53Z)
• Scalable Bayesian Meta-Learning through Generalized Implicit Gradients [64.21628447579772]
  Implicit Bayesian meta-learning (iBaML) method broadens the scope of learnable priors, but also quantifies the associated uncertainty. Analytical error bounds are established to demonstrate the precision and efficiency of the generalized implicit gradient over the explicit one.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-31T02:10:30Z)
• Exploring the Algorithm-Dependent Generalization of AUPRC Optimization with List Stability [107.65337427333064]
  optimization of the Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC) is a crucial problem for machine learning. In this work, we present the first trial in the single-dependent generalization of AUPRC optimization. Experiments on three image retrieval datasets on speak to the effectiveness and soundness of our framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-27T09:06:37Z)
• Smoothing Advantage Learning [20.760987175553645]
  We propose a simple variant of Advantage learning (AL) named smoothing advantage learning (SAL) The proposed value smoothing technique not only helps to stabilize the training procedure of AL by controlling the trade-off between convergence rate and the upper bound of the approximation errors, but is beneficial to increase the action gap between the optimal and sub-optimal action value as well.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-20T03:52:32Z)
• Large-scale Optimization of Partial AUC in a Range of False Positive Rates [51.12047280149546]
  The area under the ROC curve (AUC) is one of the most widely used performance measures for classification models in machine learning. We develop an efficient approximated gradient descent method based on recent practical envelope smoothing technique. Our proposed algorithm can also be used to minimize the sum of some ranked range loss, which also lacks efficient solvers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T03:46:18Z)
• Interpolation-based Contrastive Learning for Few-Label Semi-Supervised Learning [43.51182049644767]
  Semi-supervised learning (SSL) has long been proved to be an effective technique to construct powerful models with limited labels. Regularization-based methods which force the perturbed samples to have similar predictions with the original ones have attracted much attention. We propose a novel contrastive loss to guide the embedding of the learned network to change linearly between samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-24T06:00:05Z)
• Local Learning Matters: Rethinking Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learning [61.488646649045215]
  Federated learning (FL) is a promising strategy for performing privacy-preserving, distributed learning with a network of clients (i.e., edge devices)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-28T19:03:39Z)
• A Boosting Approach to Reinforcement Learning [59.46285581748018]
  We study efficient algorithms for reinforcement learning in decision processes whose complexity is independent of the number of states. We give an efficient algorithm that is capable of improving the accuracy of such weak learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-22T16:00:45Z)
• High Probability Complexity Bounds for Non-Smooth Stochastic Optimization with Heavy-Tailed Noise [51.31435087414348]
  It is essential to theoretically guarantee that algorithms provide small objective residual with high probability. Existing methods for non-smooth convex optimization have complexity bounds with dependence on confidence level. We propose novel stepsize rules for two methods with gradient clipping.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-10T17:54:21Z)
• Global Optimization of Objective Functions Represented by ReLU Networks [77.55969359556032]
  Neural networks can learn complex, non- adversarial functions, and it is challenging to guarantee their correct behavior in safety-critical contexts. Many approaches exist to find failures in networks (e.g., adversarial examples), but these cannot guarantee the absence of failures. We propose an approach that integrates the optimization process into the verification procedure, achieving better performance than the naive approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T08:19:48Z)
• The Strength of Nesterov's Extrapolation in the Individual Convergence of Nonsmooth Optimization [0.0]
  We prove that Nesterov's extrapolation has the strength to make the individual convergence of gradient descent methods optimal for nonsmooth problems. We give an extension of the derived algorithms to solve regularized learning tasks with nonsmooth losses in settings. Our method is applicable as an efficient tool for solving large-scale $l$1-regularized hinge-loss learning problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T03:35:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.