Learning to Reason via Self-Iterative Process Feedback for Small Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.08393v1
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 14:05:04 GMT
- Title: Learning to Reason via Self-Iterative Process Feedback for Small Language Models
- Authors: Kaiyuan Chen, Jin Wang, Xuejie Zhang,
- Abstract summary: Small language models (SLMs) are more efficient, cost-effective, and customizable than large language models (LLMs)
This study enables SLMs to learn to reason from self-iterative feedback.
- Score: 5.3831551965806534
- License:
- Abstract: Small language models (SLMs) are more efficient, cost-effective, and customizable than large language models (LLMs), though they often underperform in specific areas like reasoning. Past methods for enhancing SLMs' reasoning, such as supervised fine-tuning and distillation, often depend on costly external signals, resulting in SLMs being overly confident with limited supervision signals, thus limiting their abilities. Therefore, this study enables SLMs to learn to reason from self-iterative feedback. By combining odds ratio preference optimization (ORPO), we fine-tune and align SLMs using positive and negative signals generated by themselves. Additionally, we introduce process supervision for rewards in preference alignment by sampling-based inference simulation and process reward models. Compared to Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), our method improves the performance of Gemma-2B by 12.43 (Acc) on GSM8K and 3.95 (Pass@1) on MBPP. Furthermore, the proposed method also demonstrated superior out-of-domain generalization capabilities on MMLU_Math and HumanEval.
Related papers
- Teaching LLMs to Refine with Tools [68.23479664749271]
Large language models (LLMs) can refine their responses based on feedback, enabling self-improvement through iterative training or test-time refinement.
We propose CaP, a novel approach that uses external tools to refine chain-of-thought (CoT) responses generated by the same or other LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-22T05:43:50Z) - Language Models are Hidden Reasoners: Unlocking Latent Reasoning Capabilities via Self-Rewarding [74.31981011985681]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities, but still struggle with complex reasoning tasks requiring multiple steps.
We introduce LaTent Reasoning Optimization (LaTRO), a principled framework that formulates reasoning as sampling from a latent distribution.
We validate LaTRO through experiments on GSM8K and ARC-Challenge datasets using multiple model architectures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-06T22:02:30Z) - A Little Help Goes a Long Way: Efficient LLM Training by Leveraging Small LMs [74.35290684163718]
A primary challenge in large language model (LLM) development is their onerous pre-training cost.
This paper explores a promising paradigm to improve LLM pre-training efficiency and quality by leveraging a small language model (SLM)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-24T14:31:52Z) - A Gradient Analysis Framework for Rewarding Good and Penalizing Bad Examples in Language Models [63.949883238901414]
We present a unique angle of gradient analysis of loss functions that simultaneously reward good examples and penalize bad ones in LMs.
We find that ExMATE serves as a superior surrogate for MLE, and that combining DPO with ExMATE instead of MLE further enhances both the statistical (5-7%) and generative (+18% win rate) performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-29T17:46:18Z) - Self-Training with Direct Preference Optimization Improves Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [5.487210426671288]
In this work, we demonstrate that the reasoning abilities of small-scale LMs can be enhanced through self-training.
We also show that the conventional self-training can be further augmented by a preference learning algorithm called Direct Preference Optimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-25T17:59:16Z) - Aligning Large Language Models via Fine-grained Supervision [20.35000061196631]
Pre-trained large-scale language models (LLMs) excel at producing coherent articles, yet their outputs may be untruthful, toxic, or fail to align with user expectations.
Current approaches focus on using reinforcement learning with human feedback to improve model alignment.
We propose a method to enhance LLM alignment through fine-grained token-level supervision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-04T20:21:45Z) - Self-Refine Instruction-Tuning for Aligning Reasoning in Language Models [0.8133739801185272]
The alignments of reasoning abilities between smaller and larger Language Models are largely conducted via Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)
We propose the Self-refine Instruction-tuning method that elicits Smaller Language Models to self-refine their abilities.
Results obtained on commonsense and math reasoning tasks show that this approach significantly outperforms Instruction-tuning in both in-domain and out-domain scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-01T09:10:27Z) - Weak-to-Strong Extrapolation Expedites Alignment [135.12769233630362]
We propose a method called ExPO to boost models' alignment with human preference.
We demonstrate that ExPO consistently improves off-the-shelf DPO/RLHF models.
We shed light on the essence of ExPO amplifying the reward signal learned during alignment training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-25T17:39:50Z) - Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Models [52.98743860365194]
We propose a new fine-tuning method called Self-Play fIne-tuNing (SPIN)
At the heart of SPIN lies a self-play mechanism, where the LLM refines its capability by playing against instances of itself.
This sheds light on the promise of self-play, enabling the achievement of human-level performance in LLMs without the need for expert opponents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-02T18:53:13Z) - Mind's Mirror: Distilling Self-Evaluation Capability and Comprehensive Thinking from Large Language Models [20.28989820878285]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable advancements in natural language processing.
The massive scale and computational demands of these models present formidable challenges when considering their practical deployment in resource-constrained environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-15T18:56:23Z) - CRaSh: Clustering, Removing, and Sharing Enhance Fine-tuning without
Full Large Language Model [22.870512676002463]
This paper focuses on Offsite-Tuning (OFT), a representative technique that transfers transformer blocks between centralized LLMs and downstream emulators.
Inspired by these observations, we propose CRaSh, involving Clustering, Removing, and Sharing, a training-free strategy to derive improved emulators from LLMs.
Our findings demonstrate a linear connectivity among these optima falling over the same basin, thereby highlighting the effectiveness of CRaSh and OFT.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T03:08:58Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.