RAG Playground: A Framework for Systematic Evaluation of Retrieval Strategies and Prompt Engineering in RAG Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.12322v1
• Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 19:40:26 GMT
• Title: RAG Playground: A Framework for Systematic Evaluation of Retrieval Strategies and Prompt Engineering in RAG Systems
• Authors: Ioannis Papadimitriou, Ilias Gialampoukidis, Stefanos Vrochidis, Ioannis, Kompatsiaris,
• Abstract summary: RAG Playground is an open-source framework for systematic evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems.<n>We introduce a comprehensive evaluation framework with novel metrics and provide empirical results comparing different language models.
• Score: 7.418034397164883
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We present RAG Playground, an open-source framework for systematic evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. The framework implements and compares three retrieval approaches: naive vector search, reranking, and hybrid vector-keyword search, combined with ReAct agents using different prompting strategies. We introduce a comprehensive evaluation framework with novel metrics and provide empirical results comparing different language models (Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5) across various retrieval configurations. Our experiments demonstrate significant performance improvements through hybrid search methods and structured self-evaluation prompting, achieving up to 72.7% pass rate on our multi-metric evaluation framework. The results also highlight the importance of prompt engineering in RAG systems, with our custom-prompted agents showing consistent improvements in retrieval accuracy and response quality.

Related papers

• Can LLMs Be Trusted for Evaluating RAG Systems? A Survey of Methods and Datasets [0.0]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has advanced significantly in recent years. RAG complexity poses substantial challenges for systematic evaluation and quality enhancement. This study systematically reviews 63 academic articles to provide a comprehensive overview of state-of-the-art RAG evaluation methodologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-28T08:22:19Z)
• MIRAGE: A Metric-Intensive Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Evaluation [8.950307082012763]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has gained prominence as an effective method for enhancing the generative capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) We present MIRAGE, a Question Answering dataset specifically designed for RAG evaluation. MIRAGE consists of 7,560 curated instances mapped to a retrieval pool of 37,800 entries, enabling an efficient and precise evaluation of both retrieval and generation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-23T23:05:46Z)
• HawkBench: Investigating Resilience of RAG Methods on Stratified Information-Seeking Tasks [50.871243190126826]
  HawkBench is a human-labeled, multi-domain benchmark designed to rigorously assess RAG performance. By stratifying tasks based on information-seeking behaviors, HawkBench provides a systematic evaluation of how well RAG systems adapt to diverse user needs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T06:33:39Z)
• Chain-of-Retrieval Augmented Generation [72.06205327186069]
  This paper introduces an approach for training o1-like RAG models that retrieve and reason over relevant information step by step before generating the final answer. Our proposed method, CoRAG, allows the model to dynamically reformulate the query based on the evolving state.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-24T09:12:52Z)
• Unanswerability Evaluation for Retreival Augmented Generation [74.3022365715597]
  UAEval4RAG is a framework designed to evaluate whether RAG systems can handle unanswerable queries effectively.<n>We define a taxonomy with six unanswerable categories, and UAEval4RAG automatically synthesizes diverse and challenging queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T19:11:55Z)
• Do RAG Systems Cover What Matters? Evaluating and Optimizing Responses with Sub-Question Coverage [74.70255719194819]
  We introduce a novel framework based on sub-question coverage, which measures how well a RAG system addresses different facets of a question. We use this framework to evaluate three commercial generative answer engines: You.com, Perplexity AI, and Bing Chat. We find that while all answer engines cover core sub-questions more often than background or follow-up ones, they still miss around 50% of core sub-questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T22:59:34Z)
• CoFE-RAG: A Comprehensive Full-chain Evaluation Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Enhanced Data Diversity [23.48167670445722]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) aims to generate more accurate and reliable answers with the help of the retrieved context from external knowledge sources. evaluating these systems remains a crucial research area due to the following issues. We propose a Comprehensive Full-chain Evaluation (CoFE-RAG) framework to facilitate thorough evaluation across the entire RAG pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T05:20:32Z)
• Exploring Information Retrieval Landscapes: An Investigation of a Novel Evaluation Techniques and Comparative Document Splitting Methods [0.0]
  In this study, the structured nature of textbooks, the conciseness of articles, and the narrative complexity of novels are shown to require distinct retrieval strategies. A novel evaluation technique is introduced, utilizing an open-source model to generate a comprehensive dataset of question-and-answer pairs. The evaluation employs weighted scoring metrics, including SequenceMatcher, BLEU, METEOR, and BERT Score, to assess the system's accuracy and relevance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T02:08:47Z)
• RAGChecker: A Fine-grained Framework for Diagnosing Retrieval-Augmented Generation [61.14660526363607]
  We propose a fine-grained evaluation framework, RAGChecker, that incorporates a suite of diagnostic metrics for both the retrieval and generation modules. RAGChecker has significantly better correlations with human judgments than other evaluation metrics. The metrics of RAGChecker can guide researchers and practitioners in developing more effective RAG systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T10:20:54Z)
• RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [69.4501863547618]
  This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios. With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance. Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z)
• RAGGED: Towards Informed Design of Retrieval Augmented Generation Systems [51.171355532527365]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can significantly improve the performance of language models (LMs) RAGGED is a framework for analyzing RAG configurations across various document-based question answering tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T02:26:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.