Multi-Dimensional Insights: Benchmarking Real-World Personalization in Large Multimodal Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.12606v1
• Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 07:06:10 GMT
• Title: Multi-Dimensional Insights: Benchmarking Real-World Personalization in Large Multimodal Models
• Authors: YiFan Zhang, Shanglin Lei, Runqi Qiao, Zhuoma GongQue, Xiaoshuai Song, Guanting Dong, Qiuna Tan, Zhe Wei, Peiqing Yang, Ye Tian, Yadong Xue, Xiaofei Wang, Honggang Zhang,
• Abstract summary: We propose the Multi-Dimensional Insights benchmark, which includes over 500 images covering six common scenarios of human life. This design allows for a detailed assessment of LMMs' capabilities in meeting the preferences and needs of different age groups. Looking ahead, we anticipate that the MDI-Benchmark will open new pathways for aligning real-world personalization in LMMs.
• Score: 10.828419851213528
• License:
• Abstract: The rapidly developing field of large multimodal models (LMMs) has led to the emergence of diverse models with remarkable capabilities. However, existing benchmarks fail to comprehensively, objectively and accurately evaluate whether LMMs align with the diverse needs of humans in real-world scenarios. To bridge this gap, we propose the Multi-Dimensional Insights (MDI) benchmark, which includes over 500 images covering six common scenarios of human life. Notably, the MDI-Benchmark offers two significant advantages over existing evaluations: (1) Each image is accompanied by two types of questions: simple questions to assess the model's understanding of the image, and complex questions to evaluate the model's ability to analyze and reason beyond basic content. (2) Recognizing that people of different age groups have varying needs and perspectives when faced with the same scenario, our benchmark stratifies questions into three age categories: young people, middle-aged people, and older people. This design allows for a detailed assessment of LMMs' capabilities in meeting the preferences and needs of different age groups. With MDI-Benchmark, the strong model like GPT-4o achieve 79% accuracy on age-related tasks, indicating that existing LMMs still have considerable room for improvement in addressing real-world applications. Looking ahead, we anticipate that the MDI-Benchmark will open new pathways for aligning real-world personalization in LMMs. The MDI-Benchmark data and evaluation code are available at https://mdi-benchmark.github.io/

Related papers

• OCRBench v2: An Improved Benchmark for Evaluating Large Multimodal Models on Visual Text Localization and Reasoning [72.57452266982642]
  We introduce OCRBench v2, a large-scale bilingual text-centric benchmark for text recognition. We find that 20 out of 22 LMMs score below 50 (100 in total) and suffer from five-type limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-31T07:32:35Z)
• Ranked from Within: Ranking Large Multimodal Models for Visual Question Answering Without Labels [64.94853276821992]
  Large multimodal models (LMMs) are increasingly deployed across diverse applications. Traditional evaluation methods are largely dataset-centric, relying on fixed, labeled datasets and supervised metrics. We explore unsupervised model ranking for LMMs by leveraging their uncertainty signals, such as softmax probabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T13:05:43Z)
• CAMEL-Bench: A Comprehensive Arabic LMM Benchmark [10.20074702234283]
  We develop a comprehensive LMM evaluation benchmark for the Arabic language to represent a large population of over 400 million speakers. The proposed benchmark comprises eight diverse domains and 38 sub-domains including, multi-image understanding, complex visual perception, handwritten document understanding, video understanding, medical imaging, plant diseases, and remote sensing-based land use understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T17:59:38Z)
• MMIE: Massive Multimodal Interleaved Comprehension Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models [71.36392373876505]
  We introduce MMIE, a large-scale benchmark for evaluating interleaved multimodal comprehension and generation in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) MMIE comprises 20K meticulously curated multimodal queries, spanning 3 categories, 12 fields, and 102 subfields, including mathematics, coding, physics, literature, health, and arts. It supports both interleaved inputs and outputs, offering a mix of multiple-choice and open-ended question formats to evaluate diverse competencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T04:15:00Z)
• UrBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Large Multimodal Models in Multi-View Urban Scenarios [60.492736455572015]
  We present UrBench, a benchmark designed for evaluating LMMs in complex multi-view urban scenarios. UrBench contains 11.6K meticulously curated questions at both region-level and role-level. Our evaluations on 21 LMMs show that current LMMs struggle in the urban environments in several aspects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-30T13:13:35Z)
• Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models? [92.5761176224556]
  Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have recently achieved rapid progress, sparking numerous studies to evaluate their multi-modal capabilities. We identify two primary issues: Visual content is unnecessary for many samples and intentional data leakage exists. We present MMStar, an elite vision-indispensable multi-modal benchmark comprising 1,500 samples meticulously selected by humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T17:59:34Z)
• MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities [153.37868034779385]
  We propose MM-Vet, an evaluation benchmark that examines large multimodal models (LMMs) on complicated multimodal tasks. Recent LMMs have shown various intriguing abilities, such as solving math problems written on the blackboard, reasoning about events and celebrities in news images, and explaining visual jokes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-04T17:59:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.