Parametric $ρ$-Norm Scaling Calibration

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.15301v1
• Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 10:42:11 GMT
• Title: Parametric $ρ$-Norm Scaling Calibration
• Authors: Siyuan Zhang, Linbo Xie,
• Abstract summary: Output uncertainty indicates whether the probabilistic properties reflect objective characteristics of the model output. We introduce a post-processing parametric calibration method, $rho$-Norm Scaling, which expands the calibrator expression and mitigates overconfidence due to excessive amplitude.
• Score: 8.583311125489942
• License:
• Abstract: Output uncertainty indicates whether the probabilistic properties reflect objective characteristics of the model output. Unlike most loss functions and metrics in machine learning, uncertainty pertains to individual samples, but validating it on individual samples is unfeasible. When validated collectively, it cannot fully represent individual sample properties, posing a challenge in calibrating model confidence in a limited data set. Hence, it is crucial to consider confidence calibration characteristics. To counter the adverse effects of the gradual amplification of the classifier output amplitude in supervised learning, we introduce a post-processing parametric calibration method, $\rho$-Norm Scaling, which expands the calibrator expression and mitigates overconfidence due to excessive amplitude while preserving accuracy. Moreover, bin-level objective-based calibrator optimization often results in the loss of significant instance-level information. Therefore, we include probability distribution regularization, which incorporates specific priori information that the instance-level uncertainty distribution after calibration should resemble the distribution before calibration. Experimental results demonstrate the substantial enhancement in the post-processing calibrator for uncertainty calibration with our proposed method.

Related papers

• Improving reliability of uncertainty-aware gaze estimation with probability calibration [13.564919425738163]
  Current deep learning powered appearance based uncertainty-aware gaze estimation models produce inconsistent and unreliable uncertainty estimation. We propose a workflow to improve the accuracy of uncertainty estimation using probability calibration with a few post hoc samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-24T19:33:55Z)
• Combining Priors with Experience: Confidence Calibration Based on Binomial Process Modeling [3.4580564656984736]
  Existing confidence calibration methods mostly use statistical techniques to estimate the calibration curve from data. A new calibration metric ($TCE_bpm$), which leverages the estimated calibration curve to estimate the true calibration error (TCE), is designed. The effectiveness of our calibration method and metric are verified in real-world and simulated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-14T03:04:05Z)
• Calibrating Deep Neural Network using Euclidean Distance [5.675312975435121]
  In machine learning, Focal Loss is commonly used to reduce misclassification rates by emphasizing hard-to-classify samples. High calibration error indicates a misalignment between predicted probabilities and actual outcomes, affecting model reliability. This research introduces a novel loss function called Focal Loss (FCL), designed to improve probability calibration while retaining the advantages of Focal Loss in handling difficult samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T23:06:50Z)
• Towards Certification of Uncertainty Calibration under Adversarial Attacks [96.48317453951418]
  We show that attacks can significantly harm calibration, and thus propose certified calibration as worst-case bounds on calibration under adversarial perturbations. We propose novel calibration attacks and demonstrate how they can improve model calibration through textitadversarial calibration training
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T18:52:09Z)
• Calibration by Distribution Matching: Trainable Kernel Calibration Metrics [56.629245030893685]
  We introduce kernel-based calibration metrics that unify and generalize popular forms of calibration for both classification and regression. These metrics admit differentiable sample estimates, making it easy to incorporate a calibration objective into empirical risk minimization. We provide intuitive mechanisms to tailor calibration metrics to a decision task, and enforce accurate loss estimation and no regret decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T06:19:40Z)
• Sharp Calibrated Gaussian Processes [58.94710279601622]
  State-of-the-art approaches for designing calibrated models rely on inflating the Gaussian process posterior variance. We present a calibration approach that generates predictive quantiles using a computation inspired by the vanilla Gaussian process posterior variance. Our approach is shown to yield a calibrated model under reasonable assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T12:17:36Z)
• Variable-Based Calibration for Machine Learning Classifiers [11.9995808096481]
  We introduce the notion of variable-based calibration to characterize calibration properties of a model. We find that models with near-perfect expected calibration error can exhibit significant miscalibration as a function of features of the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T00:49:31Z)
• Localized Calibration: Metrics and Recalibration [133.07044916594361]
  We propose a fine-grained calibration metric that spans the gap between fully global and fully individualized calibration. We then introduce a localized recalibration method, LoRe, that improves the LCE better than existing recalibration methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T07:22:12Z)
• Unsupervised Calibration under Covariate Shift [92.02278658443166]
  We introduce the problem of calibration under domain shift and propose an importance sampling based approach to address it. We evaluate and discuss the efficacy of our method on both real-world datasets and synthetic datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-29T21:50:07Z)
• Individual Calibration with Randomized Forecasting [116.2086707626651]
  We show that calibration for individual samples is possible in the regression setup if the predictions are randomized. We design a training objective to enforce individual calibration and use it to train randomized regression functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-18T05:53:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.