The common ground of DAE approaches. An overview of diverse DAE frameworks emphasizing their commonalities
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.15866v1
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:05:01 GMT
- Title: The common ground of DAE approaches. An overview of diverse DAE frameworks emphasizing their commonalities
- Authors: Diana Estévez Schwarz, René Lamour, Roswitha März,
- Abstract summary: We look for common ground by considering various index and regularity notions.<n>We show why not only the index but also these canonical characteristic values are crucial to describe the properties of the DAE.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: We analyze different approaches to differential-algebraic equations with attention to the implemented rank conditions of various matrix functions. These conditions are apparently very different and certain rank drops in some matrix functions actually indicate a critical solution behavior. We look for common ground by considering various index and regularity notions from literature generalizing the Kronecker index of regular matrix pencils. In detail, starting from the most transparent reduction framework, we work out a comprehensive regularity concept with canonical characteristic values applicable across all frameworks and prove the equivalence of thirteen distinct definitions of regularity. This makes it possible to use the findings of all these concepts together. Additionally, we show why not only the index but also these canonical characteristic values are crucial to describe the properties of the DAE.
Related papers
- Entanglement witnesses and separability criteria based on generalized equiangular tight frames [0.0]
We use operators from generalized equiangular measurements to construct positive maps.
Their positivity follows from the inequality for indices of coincidence corresponding to few equiangular tight frames.
These maps give rise to entanglement witnesses, which include as special cases many important classes considered in the literature.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-11T15:29:41Z) - Normalization in Proportional Feature Spaces [49.48516314472825]
normalization plays an important central role in data representation, characterization, visualization, analysis, comparison, classification, and modeling.
The selection of an appropriate normalization method needs to take into account the type and characteristics of the involved features.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-17T17:46:27Z) - An Overview and Comparison of Axiomatization Structures Regarding Inconsistency Indices' Properties in Pairwise Comparisons Methods [3.670919236694521]
Inconsistency index is a function which maps every pairwise comparison matrix (PCM) into a real number.
Inconsistency index can be considered more trustworthy when it satisfies a set of suitable properties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-23T16:20:09Z) - A Canonicalization Perspective on Invariant and Equivariant Learning [54.44572887716977]
We introduce a canonicalization perspective that provides an essential and complete view of the design of frames.
We show that there exists an inherent connection between frames and canonical forms.
We design novel frames for eigenvectors that are strictly superior to existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-28T17:22:15Z) - Synergistic eigenanalysis of covariance and Hessian matrices for enhanced binary classification [72.77513633290056]
We present a novel approach that combines the eigenanalysis of a covariance matrix evaluated on a training set with a Hessian matrix evaluated on a deep learning model.
Our method captures intricate patterns and relationships, enhancing classification performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-14T16:10:42Z) - A Unified Approach to Controlling Implicit Regularization via Mirror
Descent [18.536453909759544]
Mirror descent (MD) is a notable generalization of gradient descent (GD)
We show that MD can be implemented efficiently and enjoys fast convergence under suitable conditions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-24T03:57:26Z) - Enriching Disentanglement: From Logical Definitions to Quantitative Metrics [59.12308034729482]
Disentangling the explanatory factors in complex data is a promising approach for data-efficient representation learning.
We establish relationships between logical definitions and quantitative metrics to derive theoretically grounded disentanglement metrics.
We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed metrics by isolating different aspects of disentangled representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T08:22:23Z) - Generalized Precision Matrix for Scalable Estimation of Nonparametric
Markov Networks [11.77890309304632]
A Markov network characterizes the conditional independence structure, or Markov property, among a set of random variables.
In this work, we characterize the conditional independence structure in general distributions for all data types.
We also allow general functional relations among variables, thus giving rise to a Markov network structure learning algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T01:53:10Z) - A Category-theoretical Meta-analysis of Definitions of Disentanglement [97.34033555407403]
Disentangling the factors of variation in data is a fundamental concept in machine learning.
This paper presents a meta-analysis of existing definitions of disentanglement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-11T15:24:20Z) - Further Generalizations of the Jaccard Index [1.0152838128195467]
Quantifying the similarity between two sets constitutes a particularly interesting and useful operation in several theoretical and applied problems involving set theory.
The Jaccard index has been extensively used in the most diverse types of problems, also motivating respective generalizations.
It is also posited that these indices can play an important role while analyzing and integrating datasets in modeling approaches and pattern recognition activities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-18T20:52:38Z) - Benign Overfitting of Constant-Stepsize SGD for Linear Regression [122.70478935214128]
inductive biases are central in preventing overfitting empirically.
This work considers this issue in arguably the most basic setting: constant-stepsize SGD for linear regression.
We reflect on a number of notable differences between the algorithmic regularization afforded by (unregularized) SGD in comparison to ordinary least squares.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-23T17:15:53Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.