How Well Do LLMs Generate Code for Different Application Domains? Benchmark and Evaluation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.18573v1
• Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 17:56:08 GMT
• Title: How Well Do LLMs Generate Code for Different Application Domains? Benchmark and Evaluation
• Authors: Dewu Zheng, Yanlin Wang, Ensheng Shi, Hongyu Zhang, Zibin Zheng,
• Abstract summary: MultiCodeBench comprises 2,400 programming tasks covering 12 popular software development domains and 15 programming languages. We build a static analysis-based dependency parsing tool to extract the dependencies in the ground truth for each task. We reveal the code generation performance of the LLMs across different application domains, providing practical insights for developers in downstream fields.
• Score: 38.9008464420423
• License:
• Abstract: Recently, an increasing number of AI-driven programming assistants powered by code LLMs have been integrated into various real-world software development environments, significantly boosting developer productivity. However, existing code generation benchmarks primarily focus on general-purpose scenarios, leaving the code generation performance of LLMs for specific application domains largely unknown. In this paper, we introduce a new benchmark, MultiCodeBench, to fill this gap. MultiCodeBench comprises 2,400 programming tasks, covering 12 popular software development domains and 15 programming languages. Specifically, we perform in-depth research to identify these 12 application domains. Given that each domain may involve multiple technical frameworks, and that different frameworks present distinct challenges in the coding process, we categorize the commonly used frameworks and platforms within each domain. We then sample programming problems from GitHub repositories related to these subdomains. To ensure the quality of the tasks and mitigate data leakage issues, we invite annotators to rewrite the docstrings for each task in MultiCodeBench. Additionally, we build a static analysis-based dependency parsing tool to extract the dependencies in the ground truth for each task, enabling deeper performance analysis. Through extensive experiments on MultiCodeBench with eleven representative mainstream LLMs, we reveal the code generation performance of the LLMs across different application domains, providing practical insights for developers in downstream fields when selecting LLMs. Furthermore, we analyze the reasons behind the models' failures in completing software application development tasks, offering guidance for model developers to enhance domain-specific code generation capabilities.

Related papers

• DOMAINEVAL: An Auto-Constructed Benchmark for Multi-Domain Code Generation [48.11754113512047]
  This study includes a code generation benchmark dataset DOMAINEVAL, encompassing six popular domains. Our pipeline works in a fully automated manner, enabling a push-bottom construction from code repositories into formatted subjects under study. The contributions of this study include a code generation benchmark dataset DOMAINEVAL, encompassing six popular domains, a fully automated pipeline for constructing code benchmarks, and an identification of the limitations of LLMs in code generation tasks based on their performance on DOMAINEVAL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T16:33:58Z)
• What's Wrong with Your Code Generated by Large Language Models? An Extensive Study [80.18342600996601]
  Large language models (LLMs) produce code that is shorter yet more complicated as compared to canonical solutions. We develop a taxonomy of bugs for incorrect codes that includes three categories and 12 sub-categories, and analyze the root cause for common bug types. We propose a novel training-free iterative method that introduces self-critique, enabling LLMs to critique and correct their generated code based on bug types and compiler feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T17:27:17Z)
• R-Eval: A Unified Toolkit for Evaluating Domain Knowledge of Retrieval Augmented Large Language Models [51.468732121824125]
  Large language models have achieved remarkable success on general NLP tasks, but they may fall short for domain-specific problems. Existing evaluation tools only provide a few baselines and evaluate them on various domains without mining the depth of domain knowledge. In this paper, we address the challenges of evaluating RALLMs by introducing the R-Eval toolkit, a Python toolkit designed to streamline the evaluation of different RAGs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T15:59:49Z)
• A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generation [9.555952109820392]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have garnered remarkable advancements across diverse code-related tasks. This survey aims to bridge the gap between academia and practical development by providing a comprehensive and up-to-date literature review.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-01T17:48:15Z)
• InfiBench: Evaluating the Question-Answering Capabilities of Code Large Language Models [56.723509505549536]
  InfiBench is the first large-scale freeform question-answering (QA) benchmark for code to our knowledge. It comprises 234 carefully selected high-quality Stack Overflow questions that span across 15 programming languages. We conduct a systematic evaluation for over 100 latest code LLMs on InfiBench, leading to a series of novel and insightful findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T02:06:30Z)
• On the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Domain-Specific Code Generation [20.61882220430463]
  Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT have shown remarkable capabilities in code generation. We investigate how to effectively incorporate API knowledge into the code generation process. We refer to these strategies as a new code generation approach called DomCoder.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T05:41:02Z)
• Knowledge Plugins: Enhancing Large Language Models for Domain-Specific Recommendations [50.81844184210381]
  We propose a general paradigm that augments large language models with DOmain-specific KnowledgE to enhance their performance on practical applications, namely DOKE. This paradigm relies on a domain knowledge extractor, working in three steps: 1) preparing effective knowledge for the task; 2) selecting the knowledge for each specific sample; and 3) expressing the knowledge in an LLM-understandable way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T07:09:38Z)
• CodeScope: An Execution-based Multilingual Multitask Multidimensional Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Code Understanding and Generation [18.354576598908448]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance on assisting humans in programming. Existing benchmarks for evaluating the code understanding and generation capacities of LLMs suffer from severe limitations. We introduce CodeScope, an execution-based, multilingual, multitask, multidimensional evaluation benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T23:18:52Z)
• LLMatic: Neural Architecture Search via Large Language Models and Quality Diversity Optimization [4.951599300340954]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools capable of accomplishing a broad spectrum of tasks. We propose using the coding abilities of LLMs to introduce meaningful variations to code defining neural networks. By merging the code-generating abilities of LLMs with the diversity and robustness of QD solutions, we introduce textttLLMatic, a Neural Architecture Search (NAS) algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T19:33:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.