Complement or substitute? How AI increases the demand for human skills

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19754v1
• Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 17:26:30 GMT
• Title: Complement or substitute? How AI increases the demand for human skills
• Authors: Elina Mäkelä, Fabian Stephany,
• Abstract summary: This paper examines the impact of AI on skill demand and compensation in the U.S. economy.<n>It investigates internal effects (within-job substitution and complementation) and external effects (across occupations, industries, and regions)
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The question of whether AI substitutes or complements human work is central to debates on the future of work. This paper examines the impact of AI on skill demand and compensation in the U.S. economy, analysing 12 million online job vacancies from 2018 to 2023. It investigates internal effects (within-job substitution and complementation) and external effects (across occupations, industries, and regions). Our findings reveal a significant increase in demand for AI-complementary skills, such as digital literacy, teamwork, and resilience, alongside rising wage premiums for these skills in AI roles like Data Scientist. Conversely, substitute skills, including customer service and text review, have declined in both demand and value within AI-related positions. Examining external effects, we find a notable rise in demand for complementary skills in non-AI roles linked to the growth of AI-related jobs in specific industries or regions. At the same time, there is a moderate decline in non-AI roles requiring substitute skills. Overall, AI's complementary effect is up to 50% larger than its substitution effect, resulting in net positive demand for skills. These results, replicated for the UK and Australia, highlight AI's transformative impact on workforce skill requirements. They suggest reskilling efforts should prioritise not only technical AI skills but also complementary skills like ethics and digital literacy.

Related papers

• Artificial Intelligence and the Dual Paradoxes: Examining the Interplay of Efficiency, Resource Consumption, and Labor Dynamics [0.0]
  We explore the impact of AI on energy consumption, human labor roles, and hybrid roles widespread human labor replacement. Findings suggest that AI increases energy consumption and has impacted human labor roles to a minimal extent, considering that its applicability is limited to some tasks that require human judgment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-09T11:10:02Z)
• The Limits of AI in Financial Services [0.0]
  AI is transforming industries, raising concerns about job displacement and decision making reliability. EPOCH framework highlights five irreplaceable human capabilities: Empathy, Presence, Opinion, Creativity, and Hope. Challenge is ensuring professionals adapt, leveraging AI's strengths while preserving essential human capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T23:04:11Z)
• Follow the money: a startup-based measure of AI exposure across occupations, industries and regions [0.0]
  Existing measures of AI occupational exposure focus on AI's theoretical potential to substitute or complement human labour on the basis of technical feasibility. We introduce the AI Startup Exposure (AISE) index-a novel metric based on occupational descriptions from O*NET and AI applications developed by startups. Our findings suggest that AI adoption will be gradual and shaped by social factors as much as by the technical feasibility of AI applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T10:25:05Z)
• Raising the Stakes: Performance Pressure Improves AI-Assisted Decision Making [57.53469908423318]
  We show the effects of performance pressure on AI advice reliance when laypeople complete a common AI-assisted task. We find that when the stakes are high, people use AI advice more appropriately than when stakes are lower, regardless of the presence of an AI explanation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T22:39:52Z)
• Hype, Sustainability, and the Price of the Bigger-is-Better Paradigm in AI [67.58673784790375]
  We argue that the 'bigger is better' AI paradigm is not only fragile scientifically, but comes with undesirable consequences. First, it is not sustainable, as its compute demands increase faster than model performance, leading to unreasonable economic requirements and a disproportionate environmental footprint. Second, it implies focusing on certain problems at the expense of others, leaving aside important applications, e.g. health, education, or the climate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-21T14:43:54Z)
• Towards the Terminator Economy: Assessing Job Exposure to AI through LLMs [10.844598404826355]
  One-third of U.S. employment is highly exposed to AI, primarily in high-skill jobs. This exposure correlates positively with employment and wage growth from 2019 to 2023.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-27T08:14:18Z)
• Beyond Recommender: An Exploratory Study of the Effects of Different AI Roles in AI-Assisted Decision Making [48.179458030691286]
  We examine three AI roles: Recommender, Analyzer, and Devil's Advocate. Our results show each role's distinct strengths and limitations in task performance, reliance appropriateness, and user experience. These insights offer valuable implications for designing AI assistants with adaptive functional roles according to different situations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T07:32:28Z)
• Skills or Degree? The Rise of Skill-Based Hiring for AI and Green Jobs [0.0]
  This study aims to understand whether employers have begun focusing more on individual skills rather than formal qualifications in their recruitment processes. Our findings provide evidence that employers have initiated "skill-based hiring" for AI roles. In occupations with high demand for AI skills, the premium for skills is high, and the reward for degrees is relatively low.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-19T08:40:45Z)
• The Potential Impact of AI Innovations on U.S. Occupations [3.0829845709781725]
  We employ Deep Learning Natural Language Processing to identify AI patents that may impact various occupational tasks at scale. Our methodology relies on a comprehensive dataset of 17,879 task descriptions and quantifies AI's potential impact. Our results reveal that some occupations will potentially be impacted, and that impact is intricately linked to specific skills.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T21:44:07Z)
• Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
  We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time. We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups. If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z)
• Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
  We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being. For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.