Underutilization of Syntactic Processing by Chinese Learners of English in Comprehending English Sentences, Evidenced from Adapted Garden-Path Ambiguity Experiment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00030v1
• Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2024 01:32:10 GMT
• Title: Underutilization of Syntactic Processing by Chinese Learners of English in Comprehending English Sentences, Evidenced from Adapted Garden-Path Ambiguity Experiment
• Authors: Jiapeng Xu,
• Abstract summary: This study highlights the under-utilization of syntactic processing, from a syntactic perspective. The study identifies two types of parsing under-utilization: partial and complete. It lays a foundation for the development of a novel parsing method designed to fully integrate syntactic processing into sentence comprehension.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: Many studies have revealed that sentence comprehension relies more on semantic processing than on syntactic processing. However, previous studies have predominantly emphasized the preference for semantic processing, focusing on the semantic perspective. In contrast, this current study highlights the under-utilization of syntactic processing, from a syntactic perspective. Based on the traditional garden-path experiment, which involves locally ambiguous but globally unambiguous sentences, this study's empirical experiment innovatively crafted an adapted version featuring semantically ambiguous but syntactically unambiguous sentences to meet its specific research objective. This experiment, involving 140 subjects, demonstrates through descriptive and inferential statistical analyses using SPSS, Graph Pad Prism, and Cursor that Chinese learners of English tend to under-utilize syntactic processing when comprehending English sentences. The study identifies two types of parsing under-utilization: partial and complete. Further exploration reveals that trial and error in syntactic processing contributes to both. Consequently, this study lays a foundation for the development of a novel parsing method designed to fully integrate syntactic processing into sentence comprehension, thereby enhancing the level of English sentence comprehension for Chinese learners of English.

Related papers

• Evaluating Contextualized Representations of (Spanish) Ambiguous Words: A New Lexical Resource and Empirical Analysis [2.2530496464901106]
  We evaluate semantic representations of Spanish ambiguous nouns in context in a suite of Spanish-language monolingual and multilingual BERT-based models. We find that various BERT-based LMs' contextualized semantic representations capture some variance in human judgments but fall short of the human benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T18:58:11Z)
• Incremental Comprehension of Garden-Path Sentences by Large Language Models: Semantic Interpretation, Syntactic Re-Analysis, and Attention [11.073959609358088]
  We investigate the processing of garden-path sentences and the fate of lingering misinterpretations using four large language models. The overall goal is to evaluate whether humans and LLMs are aligned in their processing of garden-path sentences. Experiments show promising alignment between humans and LLMs in the processing of garden-path sentences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-25T03:36:13Z)
• Discourse Representation Structure Parsing for Chinese [8.846860617823005]
  We explore the feasibility of Chinese semantic parsing in the absence of labeled data for Chinese meaning representations. We propose a test suite designed explicitly for Chinese semantic parsing, which provides fine-grained evaluation for parsing performance. Our experimental results show that the difficulty of Chinese semantic parsing is mainly caused by adverbs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-16T09:47:45Z)
• Prompting Large Language Model for Machine Translation: A Case Study [87.88120385000666]
  We offer a systematic study on prompting strategies for machine translation. We examine factors for prompt template and demonstration example selection. We explore the use of monolingual data and the feasibility of cross-lingual, cross-domain, and sentence-to-document transfer learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-17T18:32:06Z)
• Textual Entailment Recognition with Semantic Features from Empirical Text Representation [60.31047947815282]
  A text entails a hypothesis if and only if the true value of the hypothesis follows the text. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to identifying the textual entailment relationship between text and hypothesis. We employ an element-wise Manhattan distance vector-based feature that can identify the semantic entailment relationship between the text-hypothesis pair.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T10:03:51Z)
• Quantifying Synthesis and Fusion and their Impact on Machine Translation [79.61874492642691]
  In Natural Language Processing (NLP) typically labels a whole language with a strict type of morphology, e.g. fusional or agglutinative. In this work, we propose to reduce the rigidity of such claims, by quantifying morphological typology at the word and segment level. For computing literature, we test unsupervised and supervised morphological segmentation methods for English, German and Turkish, whereas for fusion, we propose a semi-automatic method using Spanish as a case study. Then, we analyse the relationship between machine translation quality and the degree of synthesis and fusion at word (nouns and verbs for English-Turkish,
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-06T17:04:58Z)
• Multilingual Neural RST Discourse Parsing [24.986030179701405]
  We investigate two approaches to establish a neural, cross-lingual discourse via multilingual vector representations and segment-level translation. Experiment results show that both methods are effective even with limited training data, and achieve state-of-the-art performance on cross-lingual, document-level discourse parsing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-03T05:03:38Z)
• Pareto Probing: Trading Off Accuracy for Complexity [87.09294772742737]
  We argue for a probe metric that reflects the fundamental trade-off between probe complexity and performance. Our experiments with dependency parsing reveal a wide gap in syntactic knowledge between contextual and non-contextual representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-05T17:27:31Z)
• Is Supervised Syntactic Parsing Beneficial for Language Understanding? An Empirical Investigation [71.70562795158625]
  Traditional NLP has long held (supervised) syntactic parsing necessary for successful higher-level semantic language understanding (LU) Recent advent of end-to-end neural models, self-supervised via language modeling (LM), and their success on a wide range of LU tasks, questions this belief. We empirically investigate the usefulness of supervised parsing for semantic LU in the context of LM-pretrained transformer networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-15T21:03:36Z)
• Syntactic Structure Distillation Pretraining For Bidirectional Encoders [49.483357228441434]
  We introduce a knowledge distillation strategy for injecting syntactic biases into BERT pretraining. We distill the approximate marginal distribution over words in context from the syntactic LM. Our findings demonstrate the benefits of syntactic biases, even in representation learners that exploit large amounts of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-27T16:44:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.