CySecBench: Generative AI-based CyberSecurity-focused Prompt Dataset for Benchmarking Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.01335v1
• Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2025 16:37:04 GMT
• Title: CySecBench: Generative AI-based CyberSecurity-focused Prompt Dataset for Benchmarking Large Language Models
• Authors: Johan Wahréus, Ahmed Mohamed Hussain, Panos Papadimitratos,
• Abstract summary: We present and publicly release CySecBench, a comprehensive dataset containing 12 prompts specifically designed to evaluate jailbreaking techniques in the cybersecurity domain.<n>The dataset is organized into 10 distinct attack-type categories, featuring close-ended prompts to enable a more consistent and accurate assessment of jailbreaking attempts.<n>Our experimental results show that this method successfully elicits harmful content from commercial black-box LLMs, achieving Success Rates (SRs) of 65% with ChatGPT and 88% with Gemini.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Numerous studies have investigated methods for jailbreaking Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate harmful content. Typically, these methods are evaluated using datasets of malicious prompts designed to bypass security policies established by LLM providers. However, the generally broad scope and open-ended nature of existing datasets can complicate the assessment of jailbreaking effectiveness, particularly in specific domains, notably cybersecurity. To address this issue, we present and publicly release CySecBench, a comprehensive dataset containing 12662 prompts specifically designed to evaluate jailbreaking techniques in the cybersecurity domain. The dataset is organized into 10 distinct attack-type categories, featuring close-ended prompts to enable a more consistent and accurate assessment of jailbreaking attempts. Furthermore, we detail our methodology for dataset generation and filtration, which can be adapted to create similar datasets in other domains. To demonstrate the utility of CySecBench, we propose and evaluate a jailbreaking approach based on prompt obfuscation. Our experimental results show that this method successfully elicits harmful content from commercial black-box LLMs, achieving Success Rates (SRs) of 65% with ChatGPT and 88% with Gemini; in contrast, Claude demonstrated greater resilience with a jailbreaking SR of 17%. Compared to existing benchmark approaches, our method shows superior performance, highlighting the value of domain-specific evaluation datasets for assessing LLM security measures. Moreover, when evaluated using prompts from a widely used dataset (i.e., AdvBench), it achieved an SR of 78.5%, higher than the state-of-the-art methods.

Related papers

• DATABench: Evaluating Dataset Auditing in Deep Learning from an Adversarial Perspective [59.66984417026933]
  We introduce a novel taxonomy, classifying existing methods based on their reliance on internal features (IF) (inherent to the data) versus external features (EF) (artificially introduced for auditing)<n>We formulate two primary attack types: evasion attacks, designed to conceal the use of a dataset, and forgery attacks, intending to falsely implicate an unused dataset.<n>Building on the understanding of existing methods and attack objectives, we further propose systematic attack strategies: decoupling, removal, and detection for evasion; adversarial example-based methods for forgery.<n>Our benchmark, DATABench, comprises 17 evasion attacks, 5 forgery attacks, and 9
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T03:07:15Z)
• FORGE: An LLM-driven Framework for Large-Scale Smart Contract Vulnerability Dataset Construction [34.20628333535654]
  FORGE is the first automated approach for constructing smart contract vulnerability datasets.<n>We generate a dataset comprising 81,390 solidity files and 27,497 vulnerability findings across 296 CWE categories.<n>Results reveal the significant limitations in current detection capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T16:03:16Z)
• Prompt, Divide, and Conquer: Bypassing Large Language Model Safety Filters via Segmented and Distributed Prompt Processing [1.4201040196058878]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed task automation and content generation across various domains. We introduce a novel jailbreaking framework that employs distributed prompt processing combined with iterative refinements to bypass safety measures. Tested on 500 malicious prompts across 10 cybersecurity categories, the framework achieves a 73.2% Success Rate (SR) in generating malicious code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T15:19:55Z)
• How Robust Are Router-LLMs? Analysis of the Fragility of LLM Routing Capabilities [62.474732677086855]
  Large language model (LLM) routing has emerged as a crucial strategy for balancing computational costs with performance. We propose the DSC benchmark: Diverse, Simple, and Categorized, an evaluation framework that categorizes router performance across a broad spectrum of query types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-20T19:52:30Z)
• CASTLE: Benchmarking Dataset for Static Code Analyzers and LLMs towards CWE Detection [2.5228276786940182]
  This paper introduces CASTLE, a benchmarking framework for evaluating the vulnerability detection capabilities of different methods. We assess 13 static analysis tools, 10 LLMs, and 2 formal verification tools using a hand-crafted dataset of 250 micro-benchmark programs covering 25 common CWEs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T14:30:05Z)
• CyberLLMInstruct: A New Dataset for Analysing Safety of Fine-Tuned LLMs Using Cyber Security Data [2.2530496464901106]
  integration of large language models into cyber security applications presents significant opportunities. CyberLLMInstruct is a dataset of 54,928 instruction-response pairs spanning cyber security tasks. Fine-tuning models can achieve up to 92.50 percent accuracy on the CyberMetric benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T12:29:27Z)
• GuidedBench: Equipping Jailbreak Evaluation with Guidelines [10.603857042090521]
  Jailbreaking methods for large language models (LLMs) have gained increasing attention for building safe and responsible AI systems. In this paper, we introduce a more robust evaluation framework for jailbreak methods, with a curated harmful question dataset, detailed case-by-case evaluation guidelines, and a scoring system equipped with these guidelines. Our experiments show that existing jailbreak methods exhibit better discrimination when evaluated using our benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T06:57:27Z)
• Layer-Level Self-Exposure and Patch: Affirmative Token Mitigation for Jailbreak Attack Defense [55.77152277982117]
  We introduce Layer-AdvPatcher, a methodology designed to defend against jailbreak attacks. We use an unlearning strategy to patch specific layers within large language models through self-augmented datasets. Our framework reduces the harmfulness and attack success rate of jailbreak attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-05T19:06:03Z)
• Data Extraction Attacks in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Backdoors [15.861833242429228]
  We investigate data extraction attacks targeting the knowledge databases of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. To reveal the vulnerability, we propose to backdoor RAG, where a small portion of poisoned data is injected during the fine-tuning phase to create a backdoor within the LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-03T22:27:40Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Model based Personal Information Extraction and Countermeasures [63.91918057570824]
  Large language model (LLM) can be misused by attackers to accurately extract various personal information from personal profiles. LLM outperforms conventional methods at such extraction. prompt injection can mitigate such risk to a large extent and outperforms conventional countermeasures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T04:49:30Z)
• Robust Utility-Preserving Text Anonymization Based on Large Language Models [80.5266278002083]
  Anonymizing text that contains sensitive information is crucial for a wide range of applications.<n>Existing techniques face the emerging challenges of the re-identification ability of large language models.<n>We propose a framework composed of three key components: a privacy evaluator, a utility evaluator, and an optimization component.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T14:28:56Z)
• WildTeaming at Scale: From In-the-Wild Jailbreaks to (Adversarially) Safer Language Models [66.34505141027624]
  We introduce WildTeaming, an automatic LLM safety red-teaming framework that mines in-the-wild user-chatbot interactions to discover 5.7K unique clusters of novel jailbreak tactics. WildTeaming reveals previously unidentified vulnerabilities of frontier LLMs, resulting in up to 4.6x more diverse and successful adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T17:31:22Z)
• SORRY-Bench: Systematically Evaluating Large Language Model Safety Refusal Behaviors [64.9938658716425]
  Existing evaluations of large language models' (LLMs) ability to recognize and reject unsafe user requests face three limitations. First, existing methods often use coarse-grained of unsafe topics, and are over-representing some fine-grained topics. Second, linguistic characteristics and formatting of prompts are often overlooked, like different languages, dialects, and more -- which are only implicitly considered in many evaluations. Third, existing evaluations rely on large LLMs for evaluation, which can be expensive.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T17:56:07Z)
• Can LLMs Deeply Detect Complex Malicious Queries? A Framework for Jailbreaking via Obfuscating Intent [3.380948804946178]
  We introduce a new black-box jailbreak attack methodology named IntentObfuscator, exploiting a flaw by obfuscating the true intentions behind user prompts. We empirically validate the effectiveness of the IntentObfuscator method across several models, including ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Qwen and Baichuan. We extend our validation to diverse types of sensitive content like graphic violence, racism, sexism, political sensitivity, cybersecurity threats, and criminal skills.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T17:26:34Z)
• JailbreakBench: An Open Robustness Benchmark for Jailbreaking Large Language Models [123.66104233291065]
  Jailbreak attacks cause large language models (LLMs) to generate harmful, unethical, or otherwise objectionable content. evaluating these attacks presents a number of challenges, which the current collection of benchmarks and evaluation techniques do not adequately address. JailbreakBench is an open-sourced benchmark with the following components.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T02:44:02Z)
• CodeChameleon: Personalized Encryption Framework for Jailbreaking Large Language Models [49.60006012946767]
  We propose CodeChameleon, a novel jailbreak framework based on personalized encryption tactics. We conduct extensive experiments on 7 Large Language Models, achieving state-of-the-art average Attack Success Rate (ASR) Remarkably, our method achieves an 86.6% ASR on GPT-4-1106.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T16:35:59Z)
• AttackEval: How to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Jailbreak Attacking on Large Language Models [29.92550386563915]
  We introduce an innovative framework that can help evaluate the effectiveness of jailbreak attacks on large language models. We present two distinct evaluation frameworks: a coarse-grained evaluation and a fine-grained evaluation. We develop a comprehensive ground truth dataset specifically tailored for jailbreak prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T06:42:44Z)
• SPEED: Secure, PrivatE, and Efficient Deep learning [2.283665431721732]
  We introduce a deep learning framework able to deal with strong privacy constraints. Based on collaborative learning, differential privacy and homomorphic encryption, the proposed approach advances state-of-the-art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-16T19:31:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.