Faithful Counterfactual Visual Explanations (FCVE)

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.06841v1
• Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 15:18:31 GMT
• Title: Faithful Counterfactual Visual Explanations (FCVE)
• Authors: Bismillah Khan, Syed Ali Tariq, Tehseen Zia, Muhammad Ahsan, David Windridge,
• Abstract summary: We propose to develop a counterfactual explanation (CE) model that balances plausibility and faithfulness. This model generates easy-to-understand visual explanations by making minimum changes necessary in images without altering the pixel data. The provided explanations reflect the internal decision-making process of the model, thus ensuring faithfulness to the model.
• Score: 1.4959655297971257
• License:
• Abstract: Deep learning models in computer vision have made remarkable progress, but their lack of transparency and interpretability remains a challenge. The development of explainable AI can enhance the understanding and performance of these models. However, existing techniques often struggle to provide convincing explanations that non-experts easily understand, and they cannot accurately identify models' intrinsic decision-making processes. To address these challenges, we propose to develop a counterfactual explanation (CE) model that balances plausibility and faithfulness. This model generates easy-to-understand visual explanations by making minimum changes necessary in images without altering the pixel data. Instead, the proposed method identifies internal concepts and filters learned by models and leverages them to produce plausible counterfactual explanations. The provided explanations reflect the internal decision-making process of the model, thus ensuring faithfulness to the model.

Related papers

• CoLa-DCE -- Concept-guided Latent Diffusion Counterfactual Explanations [2.3083192626377755]
  We introduce Concept-guided Latent Diffusion Counterfactual Explanations (CoLa-DCE) CoLa-DCE generates concept-guided counterfactuals for any classifier with a high degree of control regarding concept selection and spatial conditioning. We demonstrate the advantages of our approach in minimality and comprehenibility across multiple image classification models and datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T14:27:46Z)
• Exploring the Trade-off Between Model Performance and Explanation Plausibility of Text Classifiers Using Human Rationales [3.242050660144211]
  Saliency post-hoc explainability methods are important tools for understanding increasingly complex NLP models. We present a methodology for incorporating rationales, which are text annotations explaining human decisions, into text classification models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-03T22:39:33Z)
• Evaluating the Utility of Model Explanations for Model Development [54.23538543168767]
  We evaluate whether explanations can improve human decision-making in practical scenarios of machine learning model development. To our surprise, we did not find evidence of significant improvement on tasks when users were provided with any of the saliency maps. These findings suggest caution regarding the usefulness and potential for misunderstanding in saliency-based explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-10T23:13:23Z)
• Explainability for Large Language Models: A Survey [59.67574757137078]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language processing. This paper introduces a taxonomy of explainability techniques and provides a structured overview of methods for explaining Transformer-based language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T22:14:26Z)
• Learning with Explanation Constraints [91.23736536228485]
  We provide a learning theoretic framework to analyze how explanations can improve the learning of our models. We demonstrate the benefits of our approach over a large array of synthetic and real-world experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-25T15:06:47Z)
• Perception Visualization: Seeing Through the Eyes of a DNN [5.9557391359320375]
  We develop a new form of explanation that is radically different in nature from current explanation methods, such as Grad-CAM. Perception visualization provides a visual representation of what the DNN perceives in the input image by depicting what visual patterns the latent representation corresponds to. Results of our user study demonstrate that humans can better understand and predict the system's decisions when perception visualizations are available.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-21T07:18:55Z)
• Towards Interpretable Deep Reinforcement Learning Models via Inverse Reinforcement Learning [27.841725567976315]
  We propose a novel framework utilizing Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning. This framework provides global explanations for decisions made by a Reinforcement Learning model. We capture intuitive tendencies that the model follows by summarizing the model's decision-making process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-30T17:01:59Z)
• Beyond Explaining: Opportunities and Challenges of XAI-Based Model Improvement [75.00655434905417]
  Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is an emerging research field bringing transparency to highly complex machine learning (ML) models. This paper offers a comprehensive overview over techniques that apply XAI practically for improving various properties of ML models. We show empirically through experiments on toy and realistic settings how explanations can help improve properties such as model generalization ability or reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-15T15:44:28Z)
• Beyond Trivial Counterfactual Explanations with Diverse Valuable Explanations [64.85696493596821]
  In computer vision applications, generative counterfactual methods indicate how to perturb a model's input to change its prediction. We propose a counterfactual method that learns a perturbation in a disentangled latent space that is constrained using a diversity-enforcing loss. Our model improves the success rate of producing high-quality valuable explanations when compared to previous state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T12:57:34Z)
• Explainers in the Wild: Making Surrogate Explainers Robust to Distortions through Perception [77.34726150561087]
  We propose a methodology to evaluate the effect of distortions in explanations by embedding perceptual distances. We generate explanations for images in the Imagenet-C dataset and demonstrate how using a perceptual distances in the surrogate explainer creates more coherent explanations for the distorted and reference images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T12:38:53Z)
• Right for the Right Concept: Revising Neuro-Symbolic Concepts by Interacting with their Explanations [24.327862278556445]
  We propose a Neuro-Symbolic scene representation, which allows one to revise the model on the semantic level. The results of our experiments on CLEVR-Hans demonstrate that our semantic explanations can identify confounders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-25T16:23:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.