CHIRP: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Open-Ended Response Evaluation in Vision-Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.09672v3
• Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2025 04:04:22 GMT
• Title: CHIRP: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Open-Ended Response Evaluation in Vision-Language Models
• Authors: Alexis Roger, Prateek Humane, Daniel Z. Kaplan, Kshitij Gupta, Qi Sun, George Adamopoulos, Jonathan Siu Chi Lim, Quentin Anthony, Edwin Fennell, Irina Rish,
• Abstract summary: The proliferation of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) in the past several years calls for rigorous and comprehensive evaluation methods and benchmarks.<n>This work analyzes existing VLM evaluation techniques, including automated metrics, AI-based assessments, and human evaluations across diverse tasks.
• Score: 22.128954880120222
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The proliferation of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) in the past several years calls for rigorous and comprehensive evaluation methods and benchmarks. This work analyzes existing VLM evaluation techniques, including automated metrics, AI-based assessments, and human evaluations across diverse tasks. We first introduce Robin - a novel suite of VLMs that we built by combining Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision Encoders (VEs) at multiple scales, and use Robin to identify shortcomings of current evaluation approaches across scales. Next, to overcome the identified limitations, we introduce CHIRP - a new long form response benchmark we developed for more robust and complete VLM evaluation. We provide open access to the Robin training code, model suite, and CHIRP benchmark to promote reproducibility and advance VLM research.

Related papers

• From Intention to Execution: Probing the Generalization Boundaries of Vision-Language-Action Models [5.660635614478238]
  Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models promise to produce versatile, "generalist" robot policies.<n>Traditional imitation learning benchmarks are unsuitable due to the lack of language instructions.<n>We introduce a unified suite of 50 simulation-based tasks across 10 subcategories spanning language instruction, vision, and objects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T16:52:18Z)
• Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on Fine-Grained Image Tasks: A Comprehensive Evaluation [53.84282335629258]
  We introduce a comprehensive fine-grained evaluation benchmark, i.e., FG-BMK, comprising 1.01 million questions and 0.33 million images.<n>Our evaluation systematically examines LVLMs from both human-oriented and machine-oriented perspectives.<n>We uncover key findings regarding the influence of training paradigms, modality alignment, perturbation susceptibility, and fine-grained category reasoning on task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T09:30:41Z)
• UVE: Are MLLMs Unified Evaluators for AI-Generated Videos? [20.199060287444162]
  This work investigates the feasibility of using multimodal large language models (MLLMs) as a unified evaluator for AI-generated videos (AIGVs) UVE-Bench collects videos generated by state-of-the-art VGMs and provides pairwise human preference annotations across 15 evaluation aspects. Our results suggest that while advanced MLLMs still lag behind human evaluators, they demonstrate promising ability in unified AIGV evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-13T01:52:27Z)
• OmniEval: An Omnidirectional and Automatic RAG Evaluation Benchmark in Financial Domain [62.89809156574998]
  We introduce an omnidirectional and automatic RAG benchmark, OmniEval, in the financial domain. Our benchmark is characterized by its multi-dimensional evaluation framework. Our experiments demonstrate the comprehensiveness of OmniEval, which includes extensive test datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T15:38:42Z)
• MME-Survey: A Comprehensive Survey on Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs [97.94579295913606]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have garnered increased attention from both industry and academia.<n>In the development process, evaluation is critical since it provides intuitive feedback and guidance on improving models.<n>This work aims to offer researchers an easy grasp of how to effectively evaluate MLLMs according to different needs and to inspire better evaluation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-22T18:59:54Z)
• Benchmarking Vision, Language, & Action Models on Robotic Learning Tasks [20.93006455952299]
  Vision-language-action (VLA) models represent a promising direction for developing general-purpose robotic systems.<n>We present a comprehensive evaluation framework and benchmark suite for assessing VLA models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T18:01:34Z)
• AutoBench-V: Can Large Vision-Language Models Benchmark Themselves? [65.92331309449015]
  We introduce AutoBench-V, an automated framework for serving evaluation on demand, i.e., benchmarking LVLMs based on specific aspects of model capability.<n>Through an extensive evaluation of nine popular LVLMs across five demanded user inputs, the framework shows effectiveness and reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T17:55:08Z)
• FVEval: Understanding Language Model Capabilities in Formal Verification of Digital Hardware [4.480157114854711]
  We present FVEval, the first comprehensive benchmark for characterizing large language models (LLMs) performance in tasks pertaining to formal verification (FV) The benchmark consists of three sub-tasks that measure LLM capabilities at different levels. We present both collections of expert-written verification collateral and methodologies to scalably generate synthetic examples aligned with FV.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T21:48:57Z)
• MMIE: Massive Multimodal Interleaved Comprehension Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models [71.36392373876505]
  We introduce MMIE, a large-scale benchmark for evaluating interleaved multimodal comprehension and generation in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) MMIE comprises 20K meticulously curated multimodal queries, spanning 3 categories, 12 fields, and 102 subfields, including mathematics, coding, physics, literature, health, and arts. It supports both interleaved inputs and outputs, offering a mix of multiple-choice and open-ended question formats to evaluate diverse competencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T04:15:00Z)
• VHELM: A Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Models [75.88987277686914]
  We present the Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Models (VHELM) VHELM aggregates various datasets to cover one or more of the 9 aspects: visual perception, knowledge, reasoning, bias, fairness, multilinguality, robustness, toxicity, and safety. Our framework is designed to be lightweight and automatic so that evaluation runs are cheap and fast.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T17:46:34Z)
• Prismatic VLMs: Investigating the Design Space of Visually-Conditioned Language Models [73.40350756742231]
  Visually-conditioned language models (VLMs) have seen growing adoption in applications such as visual dialogue, scene understanding, and robotic task planning. Despite the volume of new releases, key design decisions around image preprocessing, architecture, and optimization are under-explored.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T18:21:14Z)
• Prometheus-Vision: Vision-Language Model as a Judge for Fine-Grained Evaluation [31.062433484245684]
  We train Prometheus-Vision, the first open-source VLM evaluator model that can understand the user-defined score criteria during evaluation. Prometheus-Vision shows the highest Pearson correlation with human evaluators and GPT-4V among open-source models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T14:19:23Z)
• MLLM-Bench: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs with Per-sample Criteria [49.500322937449326]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have broadened the scope of AI applications. Existing automatic evaluation methodologies for MLLMs are mainly limited in evaluating queries without considering user experiences. We propose a new evaluation paradigm for MLLMs, which is evaluating MLLMs with per-sample criteria using potent MLLM as the judge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-23T12:04:25Z)
• MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player? [114.45702807380415]
  We propose MMBench, a benchmark for assessing the multi-modal capabilities of vision-language models. MMBench is meticulously curated with well-designed quality control schemes. MMBench incorporates multiple-choice questions in both English and Chinese versions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-12T16:23:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.