Irony in Emojis: A Comparative Study of Human and LLM Interpretation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.11241v1
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 03:02:00 GMT
- Title: Irony in Emojis: A Comparative Study of Human and LLM Interpretation
- Authors: Yawen Zheng, Hanjia Lyu, Jiebo Luo,
- Abstract summary: This study examines the ability of GPT-4o to interpret irony in emojis.
By prompting GPT-4o to evaluate the likelihood of specific emojis being used to express irony on social media, we aim to bridge the gap between machine and human understanding.
- Score: 53.66354612549173
- License:
- Abstract: Emojis have become a universal language in online communication, often carrying nuanced and context-dependent meanings. Among these, irony poses a significant challenge for Large Language Models (LLMs) due to its inherent incongruity between appearance and intent. This study examines the ability of GPT-4o to interpret irony in emojis. By prompting GPT-4o to evaluate the likelihood of specific emojis being used to express irony on social media and comparing its interpretations with human perceptions, we aim to bridge the gap between machine and human understanding. Our findings reveal nuanced insights into GPT-4o's interpretive capabilities, highlighting areas of alignment with and divergence from human behavior. Additionally, this research underscores the importance of demographic factors, such as age and gender, in shaping emoji interpretation and evaluates how these factors influence GPT-4o's performance.
Related papers
- Irony Detection, Reasoning and Understanding in Zero-shot Learning [0.5755004576310334]
Irony is a powerful figurative language (FL) on social media that can potentially mislead various NLP tasks.
Large language models, such as ChatGPT, are increasingly able to capture implicit and contextual information.
We propose a prompt engineering design framework IDADP to achieve higher irony detection accuracy, improved understanding of irony, and more effective explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-28T12:13:07Z) - Unlocking Cross-Lingual Sentiment Analysis through Emoji Interpretation: A Multimodal Generative AI Approach [8.762679920056486]
Emojis have become ubiquitous in online communication, serving as a universal medium to convey emotions.
Our study aims to investigate the capacity of emojis to serve as reliable sentiment markers through large language models (LLMs)
Our analysis reveals that the accuracy of LLM-based emoji-conveyed sentiment is 81.43%, underscoring emojis' significant potential to serve as a universal sentiment marker.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-23T03:57:45Z) - Semantics Preserving Emoji Recommendation with Large Language Models [47.94761630160614]
Existing emoji recommendation methods are primarily evaluated based on their ability to match the exact emoji a user chooses in the original text.
We propose a new semantics preserving evaluation framework for emoji recommendation, which measures a model's ability to recommend emojis that maintain the semantic consistency with the user's text.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-16T22:27:46Z) - Emojis Decoded: Leveraging ChatGPT for Enhanced Understanding in Social
Media Communications [15.621456693085234]
Emojis have become prevalent in social network communications.
Researchers rely on crowd-sourcing to annotate emojis in order to understand their sentiments, usage intentions, and semantic meanings.
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved significant success in various annotation tasks.
This study aims to validate the hypothesis that ChatGPT can serve as a viable alternative to human annotators in emoji research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-22T06:02:39Z) - Human vs. LMMs: Exploring the Discrepancy in Emoji Interpretation and Usage in Digital Communication [68.40865217231695]
This study examines the behavior of GPT-4V in replicating human-like use of emojis.
The findings reveal a discernible discrepancy between human and GPT-4V behaviors, likely due to the subjective nature of human interpretation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-16T08:56:52Z) - Holistic Analysis of Hallucination in GPT-4V(ision): Bias and
Interference Challenges [54.42256219010956]
This benchmark is designed to evaluate and shed light on the two common types of hallucinations in visual language models: bias and interference.
bias refers to the model's tendency to hallucinate certain types of responses, possibly due to imbalance in its training data.
interference pertains to scenarios where the judgment of GPT-4V(ision) can be disrupted due to how the text prompt is phrased or how the input image is presented.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-06T17:26:59Z) - Black or White but never neutral: How readers perceive identity from
yellow or skin-toned emoji [90.14874935843544]
Recent work established a connection between expression of identity and emoji usage on social media.
This work asks if, as with language, readers are sensitive to such acts of self-expression and use them to understand the identity of authors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-12T18:23:51Z) - Semantic Journeys: Quantifying Change in Emoji Meaning from 2012-2018 [66.28665205489845]
We offer the first longitudinal study of how emoji semantics changes over time, applying techniques from computational linguistics to six years of Twitter data.
We identify five patterns in emoji semantic development and find evidence that the less abstract an emoji is, the more likely it is to undergo semantic change.
To aid future work on emoji and semantics, we make our data publicly available along with a web-based interface that anyone can use to explore semantic change in emoji.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-03T13:35:10Z) - Are Emojis Emotional? A Study to Understand the Association between
Emojis and Emotions [37.86739837901986]
We seek to explore the connection between emojis and emotions by means of a new dataset consisting of human-solicited association ratings.
We additionally conduct experiments to assess to what extent such associations can be inferred from existing data, such as similar associations can be predicted for a larger set of emojis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-02T04:04:42Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.