Insights from Publishing Open Data in Industry-Academia Collaboration
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14841v1
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 07:30:46 GMT
- Title: Insights from Publishing Open Data in Industry-Academia Collaboration
- Authors: Per Erik Strandberg, Philipp Peterseil, Julian Karoliny, Johanna Kallio, Johannes Peltola,
- Abstract summary: This paper explores the motivations and lessons learned from publishing open data sets in such collaborations.
We surveyed participants in a European research project that published 13 data sets.
We found that planning the data collection is essential, and that only few datasets had accompanying scripts for improved reuse.
- Score: 3.458783333044753
- License:
- Abstract: Effective data management and sharing are critical success factors in industry-academia collaboration. This paper explores the motivations and lessons learned from publishing open data sets in such collaborations. Through a survey of participants in a European research project that published 13 data sets, and an analysis of metadata from almost 281 thousand datasets in Zenodo, we collected qualitative and quantitative results on motivations, achievements, research questions, licences and file types. Through inductive reasoning and statistical analysis we found that planning the data collection is essential, and that only few datasets (2.4%) had accompanying scripts for improved reuse. We also found that authors are not well aware of the importance of licences or which licence to choose. Finally, we found that data with a synthetic origin, collected with simulations and potentially mixed with real measurements, can be very meaningful, as predicted by Gartner and illustrated by many datasets collected in our research project.
Related papers
- SciER: An Entity and Relation Extraction Dataset for Datasets, Methods, and Tasks in Scientific Documents [49.54155332262579]
We release a new entity and relation extraction dataset for entities related to datasets, methods, and tasks in scientific articles.
Our dataset contains 106 manually annotated full-text scientific publications with over 24k entities and 12k relations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-28T15:56:49Z) - Data-Centric AI in the Age of Large Language Models [51.20451986068925]
This position paper proposes a data-centric viewpoint of AI research, focusing on large language models (LLMs)
We make the key observation that data is instrumental in the developmental (e.g., pretraining and fine-tuning) and inferential stages (e.g., in-context learning) of LLMs.
We identify four specific scenarios centered around data, covering data-centric benchmarks and data curation, data attribution, knowledge transfer, and inference contextualization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T16:34:07Z) - Using Large Language Models to Enrich the Documentation of Datasets for Machine Learning [1.8270184406083445]
We explore using large language models (LLM) and prompting strategies to automatically extract dimensions from documents.
Our approach could aid data publishers and practitioners in creating machine-readable documentation.
We have released an open-source tool implementing our approach and a replication package, including the experiments' code and results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-04T10:09:28Z) - A Survey on Data Selection for Language Models [148.300726396877]
Data selection methods aim to determine which data points to include in a training dataset.
Deep learning is mostly driven by empirical evidence and experimentation on large-scale data is expensive.
Few organizations have the resources for extensive data selection research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-26T18:54:35Z) - Capture the Flag: Uncovering Data Insights with Large Language Models [90.47038584812925]
This study explores the potential of using Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate the discovery of insights in data.
We propose a new evaluation methodology based on a "capture the flag" principle, measuring the ability of such models to recognize meaningful and pertinent information (flags) in a dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-21T14:20:06Z) - Assessing Scientific Contributions in Data Sharing Spaces [64.16762375635842]
This paper introduces the SCIENCE-index, a blockchain-based metric measuring a researcher's scientific contributions.
To incentivize researchers to share their data, the SCIENCE-index is augmented to include a data-sharing parameter.
Our model is evaluated by comparing the distribution of its output for geographically diverse researchers to that of the h-index.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-18T19:17:47Z) - Documenting Data Production Processes: A Participatory Approach for Data
Work [4.811554861191618]
opacity of machine learning data is a significant threat to ethical data work and intelligible systems.
Previous research has proposed standardized checklists to document datasets.
This paper proposes a shift of perspective: from documenting datasets toward documenting data production.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-11T15:39:02Z) - Unsupervised Opinion Summarization with Content Planning [58.5308638148329]
We show that explicitly incorporating content planning in a summarization model yields output of higher quality.
We also create synthetic datasets which are more natural, resembling real world document-summary pairs.
Our approach outperforms competitive models in generating informative, coherent, and fluent summaries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-14T18:41:58Z) - Extracting Entities and Topics from News and Connecting Criminal Records [6.685013315842082]
This paper summarizes methodologies used in extracting entities and topics from a database of criminal records and from a database of newspapers.
Statistical models had successfully been used in studying the topics of roughly 300,000 New York Times articles.
analytical approaches, especially in hotspot mapping, were used in some researches with an aim to predict crime locations and circumstances in the future.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-03T00:06:01Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.