YouTube Recommendations Reinforce Negative Emotions: Auditing Algorithmic Bias with Emotionally-Agentic Sock Puppets

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.15048v1
• Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2025 03:04:53 GMT
• Title: YouTube Recommendations Reinforce Negative Emotions: Auditing Algorithmic Bias with Emotionally-Agentic Sock Puppets
• Authors: Hussam Habib, Rishab Nithyanand,
• Abstract summary: This study examines YouTube's capacity to recognize and reinforce emotional preferences. Our findings reveal that YouTube amplifies negative emotions, such as anger and grievance, by increasing their prevalence and prominence in recommendations. Findings suggest the algorithm amplifies user biases, contributing to emotional filter bubbles and raising concerns about user well-being and societal impacts.
• Score: 0.624709220163167
• License:
• Abstract: Personalized recommendation algorithms, like those on YouTube, significantly shape online content consumption. These systems aim to maximize engagement by learning users' preferences and aligning content accordingly but may unintentionally reinforce impulsive and emotional biases. Using a sock-puppet audit methodology, this study examines YouTube's capacity to recognize and reinforce emotional preferences. Simulated user accounts with assigned emotional preferences navigate the platform, selecting videos that align with their assigned preferences and recording subsequent recommendations. Our findings reveal reveal that YouTube amplifies negative emotions, such as anger and grievance, by increasing their prevalence and prominence in recommendations. This reinforcement intensifies over time and persists across contexts. Surprisingly, contextual recommendations often exceed personalized ones in reinforcing emotional alignment. These findings suggest the algorithm amplifies user biases, contributing to emotional filter bubbles and raising concerns about user well-being and societal impacts. The study emphasizes the need for balancing personalization with content diversity and user agency.

Related papers

• Towards Empathetic Conversational Recommender Systems [77.53167131692]
  We propose an empathetic conversational recommender (ECR) framework. ECR contains two main modules: emotion-aware item recommendation and emotion-aligned response generation. Our experiments on the ReDial dataset validate the efficacy of our framework in enhancing recommendation accuracy and improving user satisfaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-30T15:43:07Z)
• Empathic Responding for Digital Interpersonal Emotion Regulation via Content Recommendation [0.39321523855648755]
  We propose an approach to enhance Interpersonal Emotion Regulation on online platforms through content recommendation. The proposed recommendation system is expected to blend system-initiated and user-initiated emotion regulation. The study collects 37.5K instances of user posts and interactions on Reddit over a year to design a Contextual Multi-Armed Bandits (CMAB) based recommendation system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T10:27:28Z)
• Measuring Strategization in Recommendation: Users Adapt Their Behavior to Shape Future Content [66.71102704873185]
  We test for user strategization by conducting a lab experiment and survey. We find strong evidence of strategization across outcome metrics, including participants' dwell time and use of "likes" Our findings suggest that platforms cannot ignore the effect of their algorithms on user behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T07:36:08Z)
• A First Look at Selection Bias in Preference Elicitation for Recommendation [64.44255178199846]
  We study the effect of selection bias in preference elicitation on the resulting recommendations. A big hurdle is the lack of any publicly available dataset that has preference elicitation interactions. We propose a simulation of a topic-based preference elicitation process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T14:56:56Z)
• Emotion-Aware Music Recommendation System: Enhancing User Experience Through Real-Time Emotional Context [1.3812010983144802]
  This study addresses the deficiency in conventional music recommendation systems by focusing on the vital role of emotions in shaping users music choices. It introduces an AI model that incorporates emotional context into the song recommendation process. By accurately detecting users real-time emotions, the model can generate personalized song recommendations that align with the users emotional state.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-17T05:55:36Z)
• Fairness Through Domain Awareness: Mitigating Popularity Bias For Music Discovery [56.77435520571752]
  We explore the intrinsic relationship between music discovery and popularity bias. We propose a domain-aware, individual fairness-based approach which addresses popularity bias in graph neural network (GNNs) based recommender systems. Our approach uses individual fairness to reflect a ground truth listening experience, i.e., if two songs sound similar, this similarity should be reflected in their representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-28T14:12:25Z)
• Engagement, User Satisfaction, and the Amplification of Divisive Content on Social Media [22.206581957044513]
  We find that Twitter's engagement-based ranking algorithm amplifies emotionally charged, out-group hostile content. We explore the implications of an alternative approach that ranks content based on users' stated preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T13:57:30Z)
• How Would The Viewer Feel? Estimating Wellbeing From Video Scenarios [73.24092762346095]
  We introduce two large-scale datasets with over 60,000 videos annotated for emotional response and subjective wellbeing. The Video Cognitive Empathy dataset contains annotations for distributions of fine-grained emotional responses, allowing models to gain a detailed understanding of affective states. The Video to Valence dataset contains annotations of relative pleasantness between videos, which enables predicting a continuous spectrum of wellbeing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T17:58:25Z)
• Modeling Content Creator Incentives on Algorithm-Curated Platforms [76.53541575455978]
  We study how algorithmic choices affect the existence and character of (Nash) equilibria in exposure games. We propose tools for numerically finding equilibria in exposure games, and illustrate results of an audit on the MovieLens and LastFM datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-27T08:16:59Z)
• Preference Dynamics Under Personalized Recommendations [12.89628003097857]
  We show whether some phenomenon akin to polarization occurs when users receive personalized content recommendations. A more interesting objective is to understand under what conditions a recommendation algorithm can ensure stationarity of user's preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T19:29:53Z)
• YouTube, The Great Radicalizer? Auditing and Mitigating Ideological Biases in YouTube Recommendations [20.145485714154933]
  We conduct a systematic audit of YouTube's recommendation system using a hundred thousand sock puppets. We find that YouTube's recommendations do direct users -- especially right-leaning users -- to ideologically biased and increasingly radical content. Our intervention effectively mitigates the observed bias, leading to more recommendations to ideologically neutral, diverse, and dissimilar content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-20T22:45:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.