"My Whereabouts, my Location, it's Directly Linked to my Physical Security": An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Location-Dependent Security and Privacy Perceptions among Activist Tech Users

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16885v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 12:13:53 GMT
• Title: "My Whereabouts, my Location, it's Directly Linked to my Physical Security": An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Location-Dependent Security and Privacy Perceptions among Activist Tech Users
• Authors: Christian Eichenmüller, Lisa Kuhn, Zinaida Benenson,
• Abstract summary: At-risk users are more likely to be digitally attacked or targeted by surveillance. For activists, as for other at-risk users, the rise of smart environments harbors new risks. This contribution highlights what activists with powerful adversaries think about evermore data traces, including location data.
• Score: 7.581170689280664
• License:
• Abstract: Digital-safety research with at-risk users is particularly urgent. At-risk users are more likely to be digitally attacked or targeted by surveillance and could be disproportionately harmed by attacks that facilitate physical assaults. One group of such at-risk users are activists and politically active individuals. For them, as for other at-risk users, the rise of smart environments harbors new risks. Since digitization and datafication are no longer limited to a series of personal devices that can be switched on and off, but increasingly and continuously surround users, granular geolocation poses new safety challenges. Drawing on eight exploratory qualitative interviews of an ongoing research project, this contribution highlights what activists with powerful adversaries think about evermore data traces, including location data, and how they intend to deal with emerging risks. Responses of activists include attempts to control one's immediate technological surroundings and to more carefully manage device-related location data. For some activists, threat modeling has also shaped provider choices based on geopolitical considerations. Since many activists have not enough digital-safety knowledge for effective protection, feelings of insecurity and paranoia are widespread. Channeling the concerns and fears of our interlocutors, we call for more research on how activists can protect themselves against evermore fine-grained location data tracking.

Related papers

• Investigating Vulnerabilities of GPS Trip Data to Trajectory-User Linking Attacks [49.1574468325115]
  We propose a novel attack to reconstruct user identifiers in GPS trip datasets consisting of single trips. We show that the risk of re-identification is significant even when personal identifiers have been removed. Further investigations indicate that users who frequently visit locations that are only visited by a small number of others tend to be more vulnerable to re-identification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T08:54:49Z)
• IDU-Detector: A Synergistic Framework for Robust Masquerader Attack Detection [3.3821216642235608]
  In the digital age, users store personal data in corporate databases, making data security central to enterprise management. Given the extensive attack surface, assets face challenges like weak authentication, vulnerabilities, and malware. We introduce the IDU-Detector, integrating Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) with User and Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) This integration monitors unauthorized access, bridges system gaps, ensures continuous monitoring, and enhances threat identification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-09T13:03:29Z)
• Wireless Crowd Detection for Smart Overtourism Mitigation [50.031356998422815]
  This chapter describes a low-cost approach to monitoring overtourism based on mobile devices' wireless activity. The crowding sensors count the number of surrounding mobile devices, by detecting trace elements of wireless technologies. They run detection programs for several technologies, and fingerprinting analysis results are only stored locally in an anonymized database.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T13:20:24Z)
• Mind the Gap: Securely modeling cyber risk based on security deviations from a peer group [2.7910505923792646]
  This paper proposes a new framework for cyber posture against peers and estimating cyber risk within specific economic sectors. We introduce a new top-line variable called the Defense Gap Index representing the weighted security gap between an organization and its peers. We apply this approach in a specific sector using data collected from 25 large firms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T17:22:45Z)
• PsySafe: A Comprehensive Framework for Psychological-based Attack, Defense, and Evaluation of Multi-agent System Safety [70.84902425123406]
  Multi-agent systems, when enhanced with Large Language Models (LLMs), exhibit profound capabilities in collective intelligence. However, the potential misuse of this intelligence for malicious purposes presents significant risks. We propose a framework (PsySafe) grounded in agent psychology, focusing on identifying how dark personality traits in agents can lead to risky behaviors. Our experiments reveal several intriguing phenomena, such as the collective dangerous behaviors among agents, agents' self-reflection when engaging in dangerous behavior, and the correlation between agents' psychological assessments and dangerous behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-22T12:11:55Z)
• On the Security Risks of Knowledge Graph Reasoning [71.64027889145261]
  We systematize the security threats to KGR according to the adversary's objectives, knowledge, and attack vectors. We present ROAR, a new class of attacks that instantiate a variety of such threats. We explore potential countermeasures against ROAR, including filtering of potentially poisoning knowledge and training with adversarially augmented queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-03T18:47:42Z)
• SoK: A Framework for Unifying At-Risk User Research [18.216554583064063]
  At-risk users are people who experience elevated digital security, privacy, and safety threats because of what they do. We present a framework for reasoning about at-risk users based on a wide-ranging meta-analysis of 85 papers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-13T22:27:24Z)
• On the Privacy and Integrity Risks of Contact-Tracing Applications [32.01611421032163]
  Smartphone-based contact-tracing applications are at the epicenter of the global fight against the Covid-19 pandemic. This paper describes two important attacks that affect a broad swath of contact-tracing applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-06T15:05:02Z)
• Adversarial Machine Learning Attacks and Defense Methods in the Cyber Security Domain [58.30296637276011]
  This paper summarizes the latest research on adversarial attacks against security solutions based on machine learning techniques. It is the first to discuss the unique challenges of implementing end-to-end adversarial attacks in the cyber security domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-05T18:22:40Z)
• Give more data, awareness and control to individual citizens, and they will help COVID-19 containment [74.10257867142049]
  Contact-tracing apps are being proposed for large scale adoption by many countries. A centralized approach raises concerns about citizens' privacy and needlessly strong digital surveillance. We advocate a decentralized approach, where both contact and location data are collected exclusively in individual citizens' "personal data stores"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-10T20:30:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.