A Tale of Three Location Trackers: AirTag, SmartTag, and Tile

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.17452v1
• Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 07:16:29 GMT
• Title: A Tale of Three Location Trackers: AirTag, SmartTag, and Tile
• Authors: HyunSeok Daniel Jang, Hazem Ibrahim, Rohail Asim, Matteo Varvello, Yasir Zaki,
• Abstract summary: Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) location trackers are popular consumer devices for monitoring personal items. This study presents a comprehensive analysis of three major players in the market: Apple's AirTag, Samsung's SmartTag, and Tile. Our methodology combines controlled experiments -- with a known large distribution of location-reporting devices -- as well as in-the-wild experiments.
• Score: 0.8062368743143389
• License:
• Abstract: Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) location trackers, or "tags", are popular consumer devices for monitoring personal items. These tags rely on their respective network of companion devices that are capable of detecting their BLE signals and relay location information back to the owner. While manufacturers claim that such crowd-sourced approach yields accurate location tracking, the tags' real-world performance characteristics remain insufficiently understood. To this end, this study presents a comprehensive analysis of three major players in the market: Apple's AirTag, Samsung's SmartTag, and Tile. Our methodology combines controlled experiments -- with a known large distribution of location-reporting devices -- as well as in-the-wild experiments -- with no control on the number and kind of reporting devices encountered, thus emulating real-life use-cases. Leveraging data collection techniques improved from prior research, we recruit 22 volunteers traveling across 29 countries, examining the tags' performance under various environments and conditions. Our findings highlight crucial updates in device behavior since previous studies, with AirTag showing marked improvements in location report frequency. Companion device density emerged as the primary determinant of tag performance, overshadowing technological differences between products. Additionally, we find that post-COVID-19 mobility trends could have contributed to enhanced performance for AirTag and SmartTag. Tile, despite its cross-platform compatibility, exhibited notably lower accuracy, particularly in Asia and Africa, due to limited global adoption. Statistical modeling of spatial errors -- measured as the distance between reported and actual tag locations -- shows log-normal distributions across all tags, highlighting the need for improved location estimation methods to reduce occasional significant inaccuracies.

Related papers

• Learning 3D Perception from Others' Predictions [64.09115694891679]
  We investigate a new scenario to construct 3D object detectors: learning from the predictions of a nearby unit that is equipped with an accurate detector. For example, when a self-driving car enters a new area, it may learn from other traffic participants whose detectors have been optimized for that area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T16:31:28Z)
• Fusing Pseudo Labels with Weak Supervision for Dynamic Traffic Scenarios [0.0]
  We introduce a weakly-supervised label unification pipeline that amalgamates pseudo labels from object detection models trained on heterogeneous datasets. Our pipeline engenders a unified label space through the amalgamation of labels from disparate datasets, rectifying bias and enhancing generalization. We retrain a solitary object detection model using the merged label space, culminating in a resilient model proficient in dynamic traffic scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-30T11:33:07Z)
• I Tag, You Tag, Everybody Tags! [0.94491536689161]
  This paper studies the performance of the two most popular location tags (Apple's AirTag and Samsung's SmartTag) through controlled experiments. We find that both tags achieve similar performance, e.g., they are located 55% of the times in about 10 minutes within a 100 m radius.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-09T17:19:19Z)
• LaMAR: Benchmarking Localization and Mapping for Augmented Reality [80.23361950062302]
  We introduce LaMAR, a new benchmark with a comprehensive capture and GT pipeline that co-registers realistic trajectories and sensor streams captured by heterogeneous AR devices. We publish a benchmark dataset of diverse and large-scale scenes recorded with head-mounted and hand-held AR devices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-19T17:58:17Z)
• Benchmarking high-fidelity pedestrian tracking systems for research, real-time monitoring and crowd control [55.41644538483948]
  High-fidelity pedestrian tracking in real-life conditions has been an important tool in fundamental crowd dynamics research. As this technology advances, it is becoming increasingly useful also in society. To successfully employ pedestrian tracking techniques in research and technology, it is crucial to validate and benchmark them for accuracy. We present and discuss a benchmark suite, towards an open standard in the community, for privacy-respectful pedestrian tracking techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-26T11:45:26Z)
• Analysis of geospatial behaviour of visitors of urban gardens: is positioning via smartphones a valid solution? [0.0]
  We test the hypothesis that positions directly recorded by smartphones can be a valid solution for spatial analysis of people's behaviour in an urban garden. Three parts are reported: (i) assessment of the accuracy of the positions relative to a reference track, (ii) implementation of a framework for automating transmission and processing of the location information, and (iii) analysis of preferred spots via spatial analytics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-20T08:32:05Z)
• Supervision by Registration and Triangulation for Landmark Detection [70.13440728689231]
  We present Supervision by Registration and Triangulation (SRT), an unsupervised approach that utilizes unlabeled multi-view video to improve the accuracy and precision of landmark detectors. Being able to utilize unlabeled data enables our detectors to learn from massive amounts of unlabeled data freely available.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-25T02:48:21Z)
• TAO: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Tracking Any Object [95.87310116010185]
  Tracking Any Object dataset consists of 2,907 high resolution videos, captured in diverse environments, which are half a minute long on average. We ask annotators to label objects that move at any point in the video, and give names to them post factum. Our vocabulary is both significantly larger and qualitatively different from existing tracking datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-20T21:07:28Z)
• EHSOD: CAM-Guided End-to-end Hybrid-Supervised Object Detection with Cascade Refinement [53.69674636044927]
  We present EHSOD, an end-to-end hybrid-supervised object detection system. It can be trained in one shot on both fully and weakly-annotated data. It achieves comparable results on multiple object detection benchmarks with only 30% fully-annotated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-18T08:04:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.