Social media polarization during conflict: Insights from an ideological stance dataset on Israel-Palestine Reddit comments
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.00414v1
- Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2025 12:26:11 GMT
- Title: Social media polarization during conflict: Insights from an ideological stance dataset on Israel-Palestine Reddit comments
- Authors: Hasin Jawad Ali, Ajwad Abrar, S. M. Hozaifa Hossain, M. Firoz Mridha,
- Abstract summary: This study analyzed 9,969 Reddit comments related to the Israel-Palestine conflict, collected between October 2023 and August 2024.<n>Various approaches, including machine learning, pre-trained language models, neural networks, and prompt engineering strategies were employed to classify these stances.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: In politically sensitive scenarios like wars, social media serves as a platform for polarized discourse and expressions of strong ideological stances. While prior studies have explored ideological stance detection in general contexts, limited attention has been given to conflict-specific settings. This study addresses this gap by analyzing 9,969 Reddit comments related to the Israel-Palestine conflict, collected between October 2023 and August 2024. The comments were categorized into three stance classes: Pro-Israel, Pro-Palestine, and Neutral. Various approaches, including machine learning, pre-trained language models, neural networks, and prompt engineering strategies for open source large language models (LLMs), were employed to classify these stances. Performance was assessed using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Among the tested methods, the Scoring and Reflective Re-read prompt in Mixtral 8x7B demonstrated the highest performance across all metrics. This study provides comparative insights into the effectiveness of different models for detecting ideological stances in highly polarized social media contexts. The dataset used in this research is publicly available for further exploration and validation.
Related papers
- Mapping Controversies Using Artificial Intelligence: An Analysis of the Hamas-Israel Conflict on YouTube [2.5357699888548724]
This article analyzes the Hamas-Israel controversy through 253,925 Spanish- YouTube comments posted between October 2023 and January 2024.
Adopting an interdisciplinary approach, the study combines the analysis of controversies from Science and Technology Studies with advanced computational methodologies.
Results show a predominance of pro-Palestinian comments, although pro-Israeli and anti-Palestinian comments received more "likes"
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-16T15:27:57Z) - Talking Point based Ideological Discourse Analysis in News Events [62.18747509565779]
We propose a framework motivated by the theory of ideological discourse analysis to analyze news articles related to real-world events.
Our framework represents the news articles using a relational structure - talking points, which captures the interaction between entities, their roles, and media frames along with a topic of discussion.
We evaluate our framework's ability to generate these perspectives through automated tasks - ideology and partisan classification tasks, supplemented by human validation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-10T02:52:34Z) - Hate Speech and Sentiment of YouTube Video Comments From Public and Private Sources Covering the Israel-Palestine Conflict [3.738325076054202]
This study explores the prevalence of hate speech (HS) and sentiment in YouTube video comments concerning the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Machine learning (ML) models were applied to the extracted comment sections of YouTube videos from public and private sources.
Sentiment analysis revealed a predominantly neutral stance in both source types, with more pronounced sentiments towards Israel and Palestine observed in public sources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-03T09:03:14Z) - Quantifying Extreme Opinions on Reddit Amidst the 2023 Israeli-Palestinian Conflict [3.2430260063115224]
This study investigates the dynamics of extreme opinions on social media during the 2023 Israeli-Palestinian conflict.<n>A lexicon-based, unsupervised methodology was developed to measure "extreme opinions"<n>The analysis identifies significant peaks in extremism scores that correspond to pivotal real-life events.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-14T17:52:28Z) - A Survey of Stance Detection on Social Media: New Directions and Perspectives [50.27382951812502]
stance detection has emerged as a crucial subfield within affective computing.
Recent years have seen a surge of research interest in developing effective stance detection methods.
This paper provides a comprehensive survey of stance detection techniques on social media.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-24T03:06:25Z) - High Risk of Political Bias in Black Box Emotion Inference Models [0.0]
This paper investigates the presence of political bias in machine learning models used for sentiment analysis (SA) in social science research.
We conducted a bias audit on a Polish sentiment analysis model developed in our lab.
Our findings indicate that annotations by human raters propagate political biases into the model's predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-18T20:31:07Z) - IsamasRed: A Public Dataset Tracking Reddit Discussions on Israel-Hamas Conflict [13.92311040225417]
We present a meticulously compiled dataset-IsamasRed spanning from August 2023 to November 2023.
Our initial analysis on the dataset, examining topics, controversy, emotional and moral language trends over time, highlights the emotionally charged and complex nature of the discourse.
This dataset aims to enrich the understanding of online discussions, shedding light on the complex interplay between ideology, sentiment, and community engagement in digital spaces.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-16T08:30:41Z) - Fairness meets Cross-Domain Learning: a new perspective on Models and
Metrics [80.07271410743806]
We study the relationship between cross-domain learning (CD) and model fairness.
We introduce a benchmark on face and medical images spanning several demographic groups as well as classification and localization tasks.
Our study covers 14 CD approaches alongside three state-of-the-art fairness algorithms and shows how the former can outperform the latter.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-25T09:34:05Z) - Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model
Enhanced Approach [77.61131357420201]
We conduct a thorough and rigorous study on fairness disparities in peer review with the help of large language models (LMs)
We collect, assemble, and maintain a comprehensive relational database for the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) conference from 2017 to date.
We postulate and study fairness disparities on multiple protective attributes of interest, including author gender, geography, author, and institutional prestige.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-07T16:19:42Z) - Contextual information integration for stance detection via
cross-attention [59.662413798388485]
Stance detection deals with identifying an author's stance towards a target.
Most existing stance detection models are limited because they do not consider relevant contextual information.
We propose an approach to integrate contextual information as text.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-03T15:04:29Z) - Sentiment Analysis of Political Tweets for Israel using Machine Learning [0.0]
This research proposes an analytical study using Israeli political Twitter data to interpret public opinion towards the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
The attitudes of ethnic groups and opinion leaders in the form of tweets are analyzed using Machine Learning algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-12T12:07:43Z) - NLP-CIC @ DIACR-Ita: POS and Neighbor Based Distributional Models for
Lexical Semantic Change in Diachronic Italian Corpora [62.997667081978825]
We present our systems and findings on unsupervised lexical semantic change for the Italian language.
The task is to determine whether a target word has evolved its meaning with time, only relying on raw-text from two time-specific datasets.
We propose two models representing the target words across the periods to predict the changing words using threshold and voting schemes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-07T11:27:18Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.