Safety Alignment Depth in Large Language Models: A Markov Chain Perspective

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.00669v1
• Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2025 04:43:35 GMT
• Title: Safety Alignment Depth in Large Language Models: A Markov Chain Perspective
• Authors: Ching-Chia Kao, Chia-Mu Yu, Chun-Shien Lu, Chu-Song Chen,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in high-stakes scenarios, yet their safety mechanisms often remain fragile.<n>This paper offers the first theoretical result on how to identify the ideal depth for safety alignment.<n>We reveal a fundamental interaction between alignment depth and ensemble width-indicating that broader ensembles can compensate for shallower alignments.
• Score: 23.347349690954452
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in high-stakes scenarios, yet their safety mechanisms often remain fragile. Simple jailbreak prompts or even benign fine-tuning can bypass these protocols, underscoring the need to understand where and how they fail. Recent findings suggest that vulnerabilities emerge when alignment is confined to only the initial output tokens. Unfortunately, even with the introduction of deep safety alignment, determining the optimal safety depth remains an unresolved challenge. By leveraging the equivalence between autoregressive language models and Markov chains, this paper offers the first theoretical result on how to identify the ideal depth for safety alignment, and demonstrates how permutation-based data augmentation can tighten these bounds. Crucially, we reveal a fundamental interaction between alignment depth and ensemble width-indicating that broader ensembles can compensate for shallower alignments. These insights provide a theoretical foundation for designing more robust, scalable safety strategies that complement existing alignment approaches, opening new avenues for research into safer, more reliable LLMs.

Related papers

• Do We Really Need Curated Malicious Data for Safety Alignment in Multi-modal Large Language Models? [83.53005932513155]
  Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) have made significant progress, yet their safety alignment remains limited. We propose finetuning MLLMs on a small set of benign instruct-following data with responses replaced by simple, clear rejection sentences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T09:03:51Z)
• The Structural Safety Generalization Problem [6.577241163741174]
  LLM jailbreaks are a widespread safety challenge. Given this problem has not yet been tractable, we suggest targeting a key failure mechanism. We perform red-teaming within this framework by uncovering new vulnerabilities to multi-turn, multi-image, and translation-based attacks. We then demonstrate the potential for this framework to enable new defenses by proposing a Structure Rewriting Guardrail.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-13T20:21:08Z)
• Fundamental Safety-Capability Trade-offs in Fine-tuning Large Language Models [92.38300626647342]
  Fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) on some task-specific datasets has been a primary use of LLMs. This paper presents a theoretical framework for understanding the interplay between safety and capability in two primary safety-aware LLM fine-tuning strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-24T20:41:57Z)
• Improving LLM Safety Alignment with Dual-Objective Optimization [65.41451412400609]
  Existing training-time safety alignment techniques for large language models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks. We propose an improved safety alignment that disentangles DPO objectives into two components: (1) robust refusal training, which encourages refusal even when partial unsafe generations are produced, and (2) targeted unlearning of harmful knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T18:01:05Z)
• Almost Surely Safe Alignment of Large Language Models at Inference-Time [20.5164976103514]
  Even highly capable large language models (LLMs) can produce biased or unsafe responses.<n>This paper introduces a novel inference-time alignment approach.<n>We achieve this by framing the safe generation of inference-time responses as a constrained Markov decision process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T09:59:32Z)
• Deliberative Alignment: Reasoning Enables Safer Language Models [64.60765108418062]
  We introduce Deliberative Alignment, a new paradigm that teaches the model safety specifications and trains it to explicitly recall and accurately reason over the specifications before answering.<n>We used this approach to align OpenAI's o-series models, and achieved highly precise adherence to OpenAI's safety policies, without requiring human-written chain-of-thoughts or answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T21:00:11Z)
• Superficial Safety Alignment Hypothesis [8.297367440457508]
  We propose the Superficial Safety Alignment Hypothesis (SSAH), which posits that safety alignment should teach an otherwise unsafe model to choose the correct reasoning direction. We identify four types of attribute-critical components in safety-aligned large language models (LLMs) Our findings show that freezing certain safety-critical components 7.5% during fine-tuning allows the model to retain its safety attributes while adapting to new tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T19:53:35Z)
• Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deep [48.823599143711235]
  The safety alignment of current Large Language Models (LLMs) is vulnerable. Relatively simple attacks, or even benign fine-tuning, can jailbreak aligned models. We show that deepening the safety alignment beyond just the first few tokens can often meaningfully improve robustness against some common exploits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T00:35:23Z)
• Towards Comprehensive Post Safety Alignment of Large Language Models via Safety Patching [74.62818936088065]
  textscSafePatching is a novel framework for comprehensive PSA.<n>textscSafePatching achieves a more comprehensive PSA than baseline methods.<n>textscSafePatching demonstrates its superiority in continual PSA scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T16:51:07Z)
• CodeAttack: Revealing Safety Generalization Challenges of Large Language Models via Code Completion [117.178835165855]
  This paper introduces CodeAttack, a framework that transforms natural language inputs into code inputs. Our studies reveal a new and universal safety vulnerability of these models against code input. We find that a larger distribution gap between CodeAttack and natural language leads to weaker safety generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T17:55:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.