Towards Robust and Reliable Concept Representations: Reliability-Enhanced Concept Embedding Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.01191v1
• Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2025 09:29:39 GMT
• Title: Towards Robust and Reliable Concept Representations: Reliability-Enhanced Concept Embedding Model
• Authors: Yuxuan Cai, Xiyu Wang, Satoshi Tsutsui, Winnie Pang, Bihan Wen,
• Abstract summary: Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) aim to enhance interpretability by predicting human-understandable concepts as intermediates for decision-making. Two inherent issues contribute to concept unreliability: sensitivity to concept-irrelevant features and lack of semantic consistency for the same concept across different samples. We propose the Reliability-Enhanced Concept Embedding Model (RECEM), which introduces a two-fold strategy: Concept-Level Disentanglement to separate irrelevant features from concept-relevant information and a Concept Mixup mechanism to ensure semantic alignment across samples.
• Score: 22.865870813626316
• License:
• Abstract: Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) aim to enhance interpretability by predicting human-understandable concepts as intermediates for decision-making. However, these models often face challenges in ensuring reliable concept representations, which can propagate to downstream tasks and undermine robustness, especially under distribution shifts. Two inherent issues contribute to concept unreliability: sensitivity to concept-irrelevant features (e.g., background variations) and lack of semantic consistency for the same concept across different samples. To address these limitations, we propose the Reliability-Enhanced Concept Embedding Model (RECEM), which introduces a two-fold strategy: Concept-Level Disentanglement to separate irrelevant features from concept-relevant information and a Concept Mixup mechanism to ensure semantic alignment across samples. These mechanisms work together to improve concept reliability, enabling the model to focus on meaningful object attributes and generate faithful concept representations. Experimental results demonstrate that RECEM consistently outperforms existing baselines across multiple datasets, showing superior performance under background and domain shifts. These findings highlight the effectiveness of disentanglement and alignment strategies in enhancing both reliability and robustness in CBMs.

Related papers

• On the Fairness, Diversity and Reliability of Text-to-Image Generative Models [49.60774626839712]
  multimodal generative models have sparked critical discussions on their fairness, reliability, and potential for misuse. We propose an evaluation framework designed to assess model reliability through their responses to perturbations in the embedding space. Our method lays the groundwork for detecting unreliable, bias-injected models and retrieval of bias provenance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T09:46:55Z)
• Stochastic Concept Bottleneck Models [8.391254800873599]
  Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) have emerged as a promising interpretable method whose final prediction is based on human-understandable concepts. We propose Concept Bottleneck Models (SCBMs), a novel approach that models concept dependencies. A single-concept intervention affects all correlated concepts, thereby improving intervention effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T15:38:37Z)
• Improving Intervention Efficacy via Concept Realignment in Concept Bottleneck Models [57.86303579812877]
  Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) ground image classification on human-understandable concepts to allow for interpretable model decisions. Existing approaches often require numerous human interventions per image to achieve strong performances. We introduce a trainable concept realignment intervention module, which leverages concept relations to realign concept assignments post-intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T17:59:01Z)
• Separable Multi-Concept Erasure from Diffusion Models [52.51972530398691]
  We propose a Separable Multi-concept Eraser (SepME) to eliminate unsafe concepts from large-scale diffusion models. The latter separates optimizable model weights, making each weight increment correspond to a specific concept erasure. Extensive experiments indicate the efficacy of our approach in eliminating concepts, preserving model performance, and offering flexibility in the erasure or recovery of various concepts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-03T11:10:57Z)
• Coarse-to-Fine Concept Bottleneck Models [9.910980079138206]
  This work targets ante hoc interpretability, and specifically Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) Our goal is to design a framework that admits a highly interpretable decision making process with respect to human understandable concepts, on two levels of granularity. Within this framework, concept information does not solely rely on the similarity between the whole image and general unstructured concepts; instead, we introduce the notion of concept hierarchy to uncover and exploit more granular concept information residing in patch-specific regions of the image scene.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T14:57:31Z)
• Sparse Linear Concept Discovery Models [11.138948381367133]
  Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) constitute a popular approach where hidden layers are tied to human understandable concepts. We propose a simple yet highly intuitive interpretable framework based on Contrastive Language Image models and a single sparse linear layer. We experimentally show, our framework not only outperforms recent CBM approaches accuracy-wise, but it also yields high per example concept sparsity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-21T15:16:19Z)
• Understanding and Enhancing Robustness of Concept-based Models [41.20004311158688]
  We study robustness of concept-based models to adversarial perturbations. In this paper, we first propose and analyze different malicious attacks to evaluate the security vulnerability of concept based models. We then propose a potential general adversarial training-based defense mechanism to increase robustness of these systems to the proposed malicious attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-29T10:43:51Z)
• Concept Embedding Models [27.968589555078328]
  Concept bottleneck models promote trustworthiness by conditioning classification tasks on an intermediate level of human-like concepts. Existing concept bottleneck models are unable to find optimal compromises between high task accuracy, robust concept-based explanations, and effective interventions on concepts. We propose Concept Embedding Models, a novel family of concept bottleneck models which goes beyond the current accuracy-vs-interpretability trade-off by learning interpretable high-dimensional concept representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-19T14:49:36Z)
• Exploring the Trade-off between Plausibility, Change Intensity and Adversarial Power in Counterfactual Explanations using Multi-objective Optimization [73.89239820192894]
  We argue that automated counterfactual generation should regard several aspects of the produced adversarial instances. We present a novel framework for the generation of counterfactual examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T15:02:53Z)
• Trusted Multi-View Classification with Dynamic Evidential Fusion [73.35990456162745]
  We propose a novel multi-view classification algorithm, termed trusted multi-view classification (TMC) TMC provides a new paradigm for multi-view learning by dynamically integrating different views at an evidence level. Both theoretical and experimental results validate the effectiveness of the proposed model in accuracy, robustness and trustworthiness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-25T03:48:49Z)
• Translational Concept Embedding for Generalized Compositional Zero-shot Learning [73.60639796305415]
  Generalized compositional zero-shot learning means to learn composed concepts of attribute-object pairs in a zero-shot fashion. This paper introduces a new approach, termed translational concept embedding, to solve these two difficulties in a unified framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T21:27:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.