Conformal Uncertainty Indicator for Continual Test-Time Adaptation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.02998v1
• Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2025 08:47:18 GMT
• Title: Conformal Uncertainty Indicator for Continual Test-Time Adaptation
• Authors: Fan Lyu, Hanyu Zhao, Ziqi Shi, Ye Liu, Fuyuan Hu, Zhang Zhang, Liang Wang,
• Abstract summary: We propose a Conformal Uncertainty Indicator (CUI) for Continual Test-Time Adaptation (CTTA) We leverage Conformal Prediction (CP) to generate prediction sets that include the true label with a specified coverage probability. Experiments confirm that CUI effectively estimates uncertainty and improves adaptation performance across various existing CTTA methods.
• Score: 16.248749460383227
• License:
• Abstract: Continual Test-Time Adaptation (CTTA) aims to adapt models to sequentially changing domains during testing, relying on pseudo-labels for self-adaptation. However, incorrect pseudo-labels can accumulate, leading to performance degradation. To address this, we propose a Conformal Uncertainty Indicator (CUI) for CTTA, leveraging Conformal Prediction (CP) to generate prediction sets that include the true label with a specified coverage probability. Since domain shifts can lower the coverage than expected, making CP unreliable, we dynamically compensate for the coverage by measuring both domain and data differences. Reliable pseudo-labels from CP are then selectively utilized to enhance adaptation. Experiments confirm that CUI effectively estimates uncertainty and improves adaptation performance across various existing CTTA methods.

Related papers

• Conformal Prediction Sets with Improved Conditional Coverage using Trust Scores [52.92618442300405]
  It is impossible to achieve exact, distribution-free conditional coverage in finite samples. We propose an alternative conformal prediction algorithm that targets coverage where it matters most.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-17T12:01:56Z)
• Provably Reliable Conformal Prediction Sets in the Presence of Data Poisoning [53.42244686183879]
  Conformal prediction provides model-agnostic and distribution-free uncertainty quantification. Yet, conformal prediction is not reliable under poisoning attacks where adversaries manipulate both training and calibration data. We propose reliable prediction sets (RPS): the first efficient method for constructing conformal prediction sets with provable reliability guarantees under poisoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T15:37:11Z)
• Robust Yet Efficient Conformal Prediction Sets [53.78604391939934]
  Conformal prediction (CP) can convert any model's output into prediction sets guaranteed to include the true label. We derive provably robust sets by bounding the worst-case change in conformity scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T10:59:44Z)
• Adapting Conformal Prediction to Distribution Shifts Without Labels [16.478151550456804]
  Conformal prediction (CP) enables machine learning models to output prediction sets with guaranteed coverage rate. Our goal is to improve the quality of CP-generated prediction sets using only unlabeled data from the test domain. This is achieved by two new methods called ECP and EACP, that adjust the score function in CP according to the base model's uncertainty on the unlabeled test data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T15:16:02Z)
• Robust Conformal Prediction under Distribution Shift via Physics-Informed Structural Causal Model [24.58531056536442]
  Conformal prediction (CP) handles uncertainty by predicting a set on a test input. This coverage can be guaranteed on test data even if the marginal distributions $P_X$ differ between calibration and test datasets. We propose a physics-informed structural causal model (PI-SCM) to reduce the upper bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-22T08:13:33Z)
• Uncertainty-Calibrated Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgetting [55.17761802332469]
  Test-time adaptation (TTA) seeks to tackle potential distribution shifts between training and test data by adapting a given model w.r.t. any test sample. Prior methods perform backpropagation for each test sample, resulting in unbearable optimization costs to many applications. We propose an Efficient Anti-Forgetting Test-Time Adaptation (EATA) method which develops an active sample selection criterion to identify reliable and non-redundant samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T05:49:45Z)
• Adaptive Conformal Prediction by Reweighting Nonconformity Score [0.0]
  We use a Quantile Regression Forest (QRF) to learn the distribution of nonconformity scores and utilize the QRF's weights to assign more importance to samples with residuals similar to the test point. Our approach enjoys an assumption-free finite sample marginal and training-conditional coverage, and under suitable assumptions, it also ensures conditional coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-22T16:42:19Z)
• Distribution-free uncertainty quantification for classification under label shift [105.27463615756733]
  We focus on uncertainty quantification (UQ) for classification problems via two avenues. We first argue that label shift hurts UQ, by showing degradation in coverage and calibration. We examine these techniques theoretically in a distribution-free framework and demonstrate their excellent practical performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-04T20:51:03Z)
• SENTRY: Selective Entropy Optimization via Committee Consistency for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation [14.086066389856173]
  We propose a UDA algorithm that judges the reliability of a target instance based on its predictive consistency under a committee of random image transformations. Our algorithm then selectively minimizes predictive entropy to increase confidence on highly consistent target instances, while maximizing predictive entropy to reduce confidence on highly inconsistent ones. In combination with pseudo-label based approximate target class balancing, our approach leads to significant improvements over the state-of-the-art on 27/31 domain shifts from standard UDA benchmarks as well as benchmarks designed to stress-test adaptation under label distribution shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-21T16:24:50Z)
• Exploiting Sample Uncertainty for Domain Adaptive Person Re-Identification [137.9939571408506]
  We estimate and exploit the credibility of the assigned pseudo-label of each sample to alleviate the influence of noisy labels. Our uncertainty-guided optimization brings significant improvement and achieves the state-of-the-art performance on benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-16T04:09:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.