Rethinking Oversmoothing in Graph Neural Networks: A Rank-Based Perspective

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.04591v2
• Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 10:57:44 GMT
• Title: Rethinking Oversmoothing in Graph Neural Networks: A Rank-Based Perspective
• Authors: Kaicheng Zhang, Piero Deidda, Desmond Higham, Francesco Tudisco,
• Abstract summary: We show that rank-based metrics consistently capture oversmoothing, whereas energy-based metrics often fail. Notably, we reveal that a significant drop in the rank aligns closely with performance degradation, even in scenarios where energy metrics remain unchanged.
• Score: 5.482832675034467
• License:
• Abstract: Oversmoothing is a fundamental challenge in graph neural networks (GNNs): as the number of layers increases, node embeddings become increasingly similar, and model performance drops sharply. Traditionally, oversmoothing has been quantified using metrics that measure the similarity of neighbouring node features, such as the Dirichlet energy. While these metrics are related to oversmoothing, we argue they have critical limitations and fail to reliably capture oversmoothing in realistic scenarios. For instance, they provide meaningful insights only for very deep networks and under somewhat strict conditions on the norm of network weights and feature representations. As an alternative, we propose measuring oversmoothing by examining the numerical or effective rank of the feature representations. We provide theoretical support for this approach, demonstrating that the numerical rank of feature representations converges to one for a broad family of nonlinear activation functions under the assumption of nonnegative trained weights. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first result that proves the occurrence of oversmoothing without assumptions on the boundedness of the weight matrices. Along with the theoretical findings, we provide extensive numerical evaluation across diverse graph architectures. Our results show that rank-based metrics consistently capture oversmoothing, whereas energy-based metrics often fail. Notably, we reveal that a significant drop in the rank aligns closely with performance degradation, even in scenarios where energy metrics remain unchanged.

Related papers

• Oversmoothing as Loss of Sign: Towards Structural Balance in Graph Neural Networks [54.62268052283014]
  Oversmoothing is a common issue in graph neural networks (GNNs) Three major classes of anti-oversmoothing techniques can be mathematically interpreted as message passing over signed graphs. Negative edges can repel nodes to a certain extent, providing deeper insights into how these methods mitigate oversmoothing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T03:25:36Z)
• Residual connections provably mitigate oversmoothing in graph neural networks [33.548465692402765]
  Graph neural networks (GNNs) have achieved remarkable empirical success in processing and representing graph-structured data. However, a significant challenge known as "oversmoothing" persists, where expressive features become nearly indistinguishable in deep GNNs. In this work, we analyze the oversmoothing rates of deep GNNs with and without residual connections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-01T07:35:36Z)
• BetaExplainer: A Probabilistic Method to Explain Graph Neural Networks [1.798554018133928]
  Graph neural networks (GNNs) are powerful tools for conducting inference on graph data. Many interpretable GNN methods exist, but they cannot quantify uncertainty in edge weights. We proposed BetaExplainer which addresses these issues by using a sparsity-inducing prior to mask unimportant edges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T16:45:26Z)
• On Discprecncies between Perturbation Evaluations of Graph Neural Network Attributions [49.8110352174327]
  We assess attribution methods from a perspective not previously explored in the graph domain: retraining. The core idea is to retrain the network on important (or not important) relationships as identified by the attributions. We run our analysis on four state-of-the-art GNN attribution methods and five synthetic and real-world graph classification datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-01T02:03:35Z)
• A Survey on Oversmoothing in Graph Neural Networks [27.898197360068146]
  Node features of graph neural networks (GNNs) tend to become more similar with the increase of the network depth. We axiomatically define as the exponential convergence of suitable similarity measures on the node features. We empirically demonstrate this behavior for several over-smoothing measures on different graphs. We extend our definition of over-smoothing to the rapidly emerging field of continuous-time GNNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T10:21:29Z)
• Rethinking Explaining Graph Neural Networks via Non-parametric Subgraph Matching [68.35685422301613]
  We propose a novel non-parametric subgraph matching framework, dubbed MatchExplainer, to explore explanatory subgraphs. It couples the target graph with other counterpart instances and identifies the most crucial joint substructure by minimizing the node corresponding-based distance. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets show the effectiveness of our MatchExplainer by outperforming all state-of-the-art parametric baselines with significant margins.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-07T05:14:45Z)
• Implicit vs Unfolded Graph Neural Networks [18.084842625063082]
  Graph neural networks (GNNs) sometimes struggle to maintain a healthy balance between modeling long-range dependencies and avoiding unintended consequences. Two separate strategies have recently been proposed, namely implicit and unfolded GNNs. We provide empirical head-to-head comparisons across a variety of synthetic and public real-world benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-12T07:49:16Z)
• On Convergence of Training Loss Without Reaching Stationary Points [62.41370821014218]
  We show that Neural Network weight variables do not converge to stationary points where the gradient the loss function vanishes. We propose a new perspective based on ergodic theory dynamical systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-12T18:12:23Z)
• Towards Deeper Graph Neural Networks [63.46470695525957]
  Graph convolutions perform neighborhood aggregation and represent one of the most important graph operations. Several recent studies attribute this performance deterioration to the over-smoothing issue. We propose Deep Adaptive Graph Neural Network (DAGNN) to adaptively incorporate information from large receptive fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-18T01:11:14Z)
• A Note on Over-Smoothing for Graph Neural Networks [13.008323851750442]
  We build upon previous results citeoono 2019graph to analyze the over-smoothing effect in the general graph neural network architecture. We show when the weight matrix satisfies the conditions determined by the spectrum of augmented normalized Laplacian, the Dirichlet energy of embeddings will converge to zero, resulting in the loss of discriminative power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-23T20:36:56Z)
• Revisiting Initialization of Neural Networks [72.24615341588846]
  We propose a rigorous estimation of the global curvature of weights across layers by approximating and controlling the norm of their Hessian matrix. Our experiments on Word2Vec and the MNIST/CIFAR image classification tasks confirm that tracking the Hessian norm is a useful diagnostic tool.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T18:12:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.