Any-stepsize Gradient Descent for Separable Data under Fenchel--Young Losses

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.04889v1
• Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 12:52:12 GMT
• Title: Any-stepsize Gradient Descent for Separable Data under Fenchel--Young Losses
• Authors: Han Bao, Shinsaku Sakaue, Yuki Takezawa,
• Abstract summary: We show arbitrary-stepsize gradient convergence for a general loss function based on the framework of emphFenchel--Young losses. We argue that these better rate is possible because of emphseparation margin of loss functions, instead of the self-bounding property.
• Score: 17.835960292396255
• License:
• Abstract: The gradient descent (GD) has been one of the most common optimizer in machine learning. In particular, the loss landscape of a neural network is typically sharpened during the initial phase of training, making the training dynamics hover on the edge of stability. This is beyond our standard understanding of GD convergence in the stable regime where arbitrarily chosen stepsize is sufficiently smaller than the edge of stability. Recently, Wu et al. (COLT2024) have showed that GD converges with arbitrary stepsize under linearly separable logistic regression. Although their analysis hinges on the self-bounding property of the logistic loss, which seems to be a cornerstone to establish a modified descent lemma, our pilot study shows that other loss functions without the self-bounding property can make GD converge with arbitrary stepsize. To further understand what property of a loss function matters in GD, we aim to show arbitrary-stepsize GD convergence for a general loss function based on the framework of \emph{Fenchel--Young losses}. We essentially leverage the classical perceptron argument to derive the convergence rate for achieving $\epsilon$-optimal loss, which is possible for a majority of Fenchel--Young losses. Among typical loss functions, the Tsallis entropy achieves the GD convergence rate $T=\Omega(\epsilon^{-1/2})$, and the R{\'e}nyi entropy achieves the far better rate $T=\Omega(\epsilon^{-1/3})$. We argue that these better rate is possible because of \emph{separation margin} of loss functions, instead of the self-bounding property.

Related papers

• Large Stepsize Gradient Descent for Logistic Loss: Non-Monotonicity of the Loss Improves Optimization Efficiency [47.8739414267201]
  We consider gradient descent (GD) with a constant stepsize applied to logistic regression with linearly separable data. We show that GD exits this initial oscillatory phase rapidly -- in $mathcalO(eta)$ steps -- and subsequently achieves an $tildemathcalO (1 / (eta t) )$ convergence rate. Our results imply that, given a budget of $T$ steps, GD can achieve an accelerated loss of $tildemathcalO (1/T2)$ with an aggressive stepsize
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-24T23:10:28Z)
• The Implicit Bias of Minima Stability in Multivariate Shallow ReLU Networks [53.95175206863992]
  We study the type of solutions to which gradient descent converges when used to train a single hidden-layer multivariate ReLU network with the quadratic loss. We prove that although shallow ReLU networks are universal approximators, stable shallow networks are not.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-30T09:17:39Z)
• Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Logistic Regression at the Edge of Stability [69.01076284478151]
  In machine learning optimization, gradient descent (GD) often operates at the edge of stability (EoS) This paper studies the convergence and implicit bias of constant-stepsize GD for logistic regression on linearly separable data in the EoS regime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T16:24:47Z)
• Cross-Entropy Loss Functions: Theoretical Analysis and Applications [27.3569897539488]
  We present a theoretical analysis of a broad family of loss functions, that includes cross-entropy (or logistic loss), generalized cross-entropy, the mean absolute error and other cross-entropy-like loss functions. We show that these loss functions are beneficial in the adversarial setting by proving that they admit $H$-consistency bounds. This leads to new adversarial robustness algorithms that consist of minimizing a regularized smooth adversarial comp-sum loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-14T17:58:23Z)
• Lower Generalization Bounds for GD and SGD in Smooth Stochastic Convex Optimization [9.019243171993553]
  Training steps $T$ and step-size $eta$ might affect certify in smooth convex optimization (SCO) problems. We first provide tight excess risk lower bounds for Gradient Descent (GD) and Gradient Descent (SGD) Recent works show better rates can be attained but the improvement is reduced when training time is long.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-19T20:24:33Z)
• Over-Parameterization Exponentially Slows Down Gradient Descent for Learning a Single Neuron [49.45105570960104]
  We prove the global convergence of randomly gradient descent with a $Oleft(T-3right)$ rate. These two bounds jointly give an exact characterization of the convergence rate. We show this potential function converges slowly, which implies the slow convergence rate of the loss function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-20T15:33:26Z)
• From Gradient Flow on Population Loss to Learning with Stochastic Gradient Descent [50.4531316289086]
  Gradient Descent (SGD) has been the method of choice for learning large-scale non-root models. An overarching paper is providing general conditions SGD converges, assuming that GF on the population loss converges. We provide a unified analysis for GD/SGD not only for classical settings like convex losses, but also for more complex problems including Retrieval Matrix sq-root.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T03:55:04Z)
• On the Almost Sure Convergence of Stochastic Gradient Descent in Non-Convex Problems [75.58134963501094]
  This paper analyzes the trajectories of gradient descent (SGD) We show that SGD avoids saddle points/manifolds with $1$ for strict step-size policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-19T14:11:26Z)
• The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Data [44.98410310356165]
  We show the predictor converges to the direction of the max-margin (hard margin SVM) solution. This can help explain the benefit of continuing to optimize the logistic or cross-entropy loss even after the training error is zero.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2017-10-27T21:47:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.