Analysis of LLM as a grammatical feature tagger for African American English

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.06004v1
• Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2025 19:46:33 GMT
• Title: Analysis of LLM as a grammatical feature tagger for African American English
• Authors: Rahul Porwal, Alice Rozet, Pryce Houck, Jotsna Gowda, Sarah Moeller, Kevin Tang,
• Abstract summary: African American English (AAE) presents unique challenges in natural language processing (NLP) This research systematically compares the performance of available NLP models. This study highlights the necessity for improved model training and architectural adjustments to better accommodate AAE's unique linguistic characteristics.
• Score: 0.6927055673104935
• License:
• Abstract: African American English (AAE) presents unique challenges in natural language processing (NLP). This research systematically compares the performance of available NLP models--rule-based, transformer-based, and large language models (LLMs)--capable of identifying key grammatical features of AAE, namely Habitual Be and Multiple Negation. These features were selected for their distinct grammatical complexity and frequency of occurrence. The evaluation involved sentence-level binary classification tasks, using both zero-shot and few-shot strategies. The analysis reveals that while LLMs show promise compared to the baseline, they are influenced by biases such as recency and unrelated features in the text such as formality. This study highlights the necessity for improved model training and architectural adjustments to better accommodate AAE's unique linguistic characteristics. Data and code are available.

Related papers

• Boosting the Capabilities of Compact Models in Low-Data Contexts with Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation [2.9921619703037274]
  We propose a retrieval augmented generation (RAG) framework backed by a large language model (LLM) to correct the output of a smaller model for the linguistic task of morphological glossing. We leverage linguistic information to make up for the lack of data and trainable parameters, while allowing for inputs from written descriptive grammars interpreted and distilled through an LLM. We show that a compact, RAG-supported model is highly effective in data-scarce settings, achieving a new state-of-the-art for this task and our target languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T04:20:14Z)
• Evaluating Generative Language Models in Information Extraction as Subjective Question Correction [49.729908337372436]
  We propose a new evaluation method, SQC-Score. Inspired by the principles in subjective question correction, we propose a new evaluation method, SQC-Score. Results on three information extraction tasks show that SQC-Score is more preferred by human annotators than the baseline metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T15:36:53Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models Using Contrast Sets: An Experimental Approach [0.0]
  We introduce an innovative technique for generating a contrast set for the Stanford Natural Language Inference dataset. Our strategy involves the automated substitution of verbs, adverbs, and adjectives with their synonyms to preserve the original meaning of sentences. This method aims to assess whether a model's performance is based on genuine language comprehension or simply on pattern recognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T02:03:28Z)
• Natural Language Processing for Dialects of a Language: A Survey [56.93337350526933]
  State-of-the-art natural language processing (NLP) models are trained on massive training corpora, and report a superlative performance on evaluation datasets. This survey delves into an important attribute of these datasets: the dialect of a language. Motivated by the performance degradation of NLP models for dialectal datasets and its implications for the equity of language technologies, we survey past research in NLP for dialects in terms of datasets, and approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-11T03:04:38Z)
• A Quantitative Approach to Understand Self-Supervised Models as Cross-lingual Feature Extractors [9.279391026742658]
  We analyze the effect of model size, training objectives, and model architecture on the models' performance as a feature extractor. We develop a novel metric, the Phonetic-Syntax Ratio (PSR), to measure the phonetic and synthetic information in the extracted representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T15:58:28Z)
• Improving Korean NLP Tasks with Linguistically Informed Subword Tokenization and Sub-character Decomposition [6.767341847275751]
  We introduce a morpheme-aware subword tokenization method that utilizes sub-character decomposition to address the challenges of applying Byte Pair. Our approach balances linguistic accuracy with computational efficiency in Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) Our evaluations show that this technique achieves good performances overall, notably improving results in the syntactic task of NIKL-CoLA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-07T12:08:21Z)
• HyPoradise: An Open Baseline for Generative Speech Recognition with Large Language Models [81.56455625624041]
  We introduce the first open-source benchmark to utilize external large language models (LLMs) for ASR error correction. The proposed benchmark contains a novel dataset, HyPoradise (HP), encompassing more than 334,000 pairs of N-best hypotheses. LLMs with reasonable prompt and its generative capability can even correct those tokens that are missing in N-best list.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T14:44:10Z)
• Large Language Models Are Latent Variable Models: Explaining and Finding Good Demonstrations for In-Context Learning [104.58874584354787]
  In recent years, pre-trained large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable efficiency in achieving an inference-time few-shot learning capability known as in-context learning. This study aims to examine the in-context learning phenomenon through a Bayesian lens, viewing real-world LLMs as latent variable models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-27T18:59:01Z)
• A Unified Understanding of Deep NLP Models for Text Classification [88.35418976241057]
  We have developed a visual analysis tool, DeepNLPVis, to enable a unified understanding of NLP models for text classification. The key idea is a mutual information-based measure, which provides quantitative explanations on how each layer of a model maintains the information of input words in a sample. A multi-level visualization, which consists of a corpus-level, a sample-level, and a word-level visualization, supports the analysis from the overall training set to individual samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-19T08:55:07Z)
• Reducing Confusion in Active Learning for Part-Of-Speech Tagging [100.08742107682264]
  Active learning (AL) uses a data selection algorithm to select useful training samples to minimize annotation cost. We study the problem of selecting instances which maximally reduce the confusion between particular pairs of output tags. Our proposed AL strategy outperforms other AL strategies by a significant margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-02T06:24:58Z)
• Influence Paths for Characterizing Subject-Verb Number Agreement in LSTM Language Models [22.826154706036995]
  LSTM-based recurrent neural networks are the state-of-the-art for many natural language processing (NLP) tasks. Lacking this understanding, the generality of LSTM performance on this task and their suitability for related tasks remains uncertain. We introduce *influence paths*, a causal account of structural properties as carried by paths across gates and neurons of a recurrent neural network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-03T21:10:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.