The Art of Misclassification: Too Many Classes, Not Enough Points
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.08041v1
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 00:57:53 GMT
- Title: The Art of Misclassification: Too Many Classes, Not Enough Points
- Authors: Mario Franco, Gerardo Febres, Nelson Fernández, Carlos Gershenson,
- Abstract summary: We introduce a formal entropy-based measure of classificability, which quantifies the inherent difficulty of a classification problem.
This measure captures the degree of class overlap and aligns with human intuition, serving as an upper bound on classification performance.
- Score: 0.46873264197900916
- License:
- Abstract: Classification is a ubiquitous and fundamental problem in artificial intelligence and machine learning, with extensive efforts dedicated to developing more powerful classifiers and larger datasets. However, the classification task is ultimately constrained by the intrinsic properties of datasets, independently of computational power or model complexity. In this work, we introduce a formal entropy-based measure of classificability, which quantifies the inherent difficulty of a classification problem by assessing the uncertainty in class assignments given feature representations. This measure captures the degree of class overlap and aligns with human intuition, serving as an upper bound on classification performance for classification problems. Our results establish a theoretical limit beyond which no classifier can improve the classification accuracy, regardless of the architecture or amount of data, in a given problem. Our approach provides a principled framework for understanding when classification is inherently fallible and fundamentally ambiguous.
Related papers
- Harnessing Superclasses for Learning from Hierarchical Databases [1.835004446596942]
In many large-scale classification problems, classes are organized in a known hierarchy, typically represented as a tree.
We introduce a loss for this type of supervised hierarchical classification.
Our approach does not entail any significant additional computational cost compared with the loss of cross-entropy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-25T14:39:52Z) - Fine-Grained ImageNet Classification in the Wild [0.0]
Robustness tests can uncover several vulnerabilities and biases which go unnoticed during the typical model evaluation stage.
In our work, we perform fine-grained classification on closely related categories, which are identified with the help of hierarchical knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-04T12:25:07Z) - Anomaly Detection using Ensemble Classification and Evidence Theory [62.997667081978825]
We present a novel approach for novel detection using ensemble classification and evidence theory.
A pool selection strategy is presented to build a solid ensemble classifier.
We use uncertainty for the anomaly detection approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-23T00:50:41Z) - Multi-class Classification with Fuzzy-feature Observations: Theory and
Algorithms [36.810603503167755]
We propose a novel framework to address a new realistic problem called multi-class classification with imprecise observations (MCIMO)
First, we give the theoretical analysis of the MCIMO problem based on fuzzy Rademacher complexity.
Then, two practical algorithms based on support vector machine and neural networks are constructed to solve the proposed new problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-09T07:14:00Z) - The Overlooked Classifier in Human-Object Interaction Recognition [82.20671129356037]
We encode the semantic correlation among classes into the classification head by initializing the weights with language embeddings of HOIs.
We propose a new loss named LSE-Sign to enhance multi-label learning on a long-tailed dataset.
Our simple yet effective method enables detection-free HOI classification, outperforming the state-of-the-arts that require object detection and human pose by a clear margin.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-10T23:35:00Z) - Learning Debiased and Disentangled Representations for Semantic
Segmentation [52.35766945827972]
We propose a model-agnostic and training scheme for semantic segmentation.
By randomly eliminating certain class information in each training iteration, we effectively reduce feature dependencies among classes.
Models trained with our approach demonstrate strong results on multiple semantic segmentation benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-31T16:15:09Z) - Theoretical Insights Into Multiclass Classification: A High-dimensional
Asymptotic View [82.80085730891126]
We provide the first modernally precise analysis of linear multiclass classification.
Our analysis reveals that the classification accuracy is highly distribution-dependent.
The insights gained may pave the way for a precise understanding of other classification algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-16T05:17:29Z) - Learning and Evaluating Representations for Deep One-class
Classification [59.095144932794646]
We present a two-stage framework for deep one-class classification.
We first learn self-supervised representations from one-class data, and then build one-class classifiers on learned representations.
In experiments, we demonstrate state-of-the-art performance on visual domain one-class classification benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-04T23:33:41Z) - Evaluating Nonlinear Decision Trees for Binary Classification Tasks with
Other Existing Methods [8.870380386952993]
Classification of datasets into two or more distinct classes is an important machine learning task.
Many methods are able to classify binary classification tasks with a very high accuracy on test data, but cannot provide any easily interpretable explanation.
We highlight and evaluate a recently proposed nonlinear decision tree approach with a number of commonly used classification methods on a number of datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-25T00:00:23Z) - Revisiting Data Complexity Metrics Based on Morphology for Overlap and
Imbalance: Snapshot, New Overlap Number of Balls Metrics and Singular
Problems Prospect [9.666866159867444]
This research work focuses on revisiting complexity metrics based on data morphology.
Being based on ball coverage by classes, they are named after Overlap Number of Balls.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-15T18:21:13Z) - A Systematic Evaluation: Fine-Grained CNN vs. Traditional CNN
Classifiers [54.996358399108566]
We investigate the performance of the landmark general CNN classifiers, which presented top-notch results on large scale classification datasets.
We compare it against state-of-the-art fine-grained classifiers.
We show an extensive evaluation on six datasets to determine whether the fine-grained classifier is able to elevate the baseline in their experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-24T23:49:14Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.