The Validation Gap: A Mechanistic Analysis of How Language Models Compute Arithmetic but Fail to Validate It

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.11771v1
• Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 13:00:44 GMT
• Title: The Validation Gap: A Mechanistic Analysis of How Language Models Compute Arithmetic but Fail to Validate It
• Authors: Leonardo Bertolazzi, Philipp Mondorf, Barbara Plank, Raffaella Bernardi,
• Abstract summary: We present a mechanistic analysis of error detection in large language models (LLMs) Through circuit analysis, we identify the computational subgraphs responsible for detecting arithmetic errors across four smaller-sized LLMs. Our findings reveal that all models heavily rely on $textitconsistency heads$--attention heads that assess surface-level alignment of numerical values in arithmetic solutions.
• Score: 23.803612556616685
• License:
• Abstract: The ability of large language models (LLMs) to validate their output and identify potential errors is crucial for ensuring robustness and reliability. However, current research indicates that LLMs struggle with self-correction, encountering significant challenges in detecting errors. While studies have explored methods to enhance self-correction in LLMs, relatively little attention has been given to understanding the models' internal mechanisms underlying error detection. In this paper, we present a mechanistic analysis of error detection in LLMs, focusing on simple arithmetic problems. Through circuit analysis, we identify the computational subgraphs responsible for detecting arithmetic errors across four smaller-sized LLMs. Our findings reveal that all models heavily rely on $\textit{consistency heads}$--attention heads that assess surface-level alignment of numerical values in arithmetic solutions. Moreover, we observe that the models' internal arithmetic computation primarily occurs in higher layers, whereas validation takes place in middle layers, before the final arithmetic results are fully encoded. This structural dissociation between arithmetic computation and validation seems to explain why current LLMs struggle to detect even simple arithmetic errors.

Related papers

• Large Language Models and Mathematical Reasoning Failures [1.6114012813668932]
  This paper investigates the mathematical reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) using 50 newly constructed high-school-level word problems. We rigorously analyze both final answers and solution steps to identify reasoning failures. We find that while newer models (e.g., o3-mini, deepseek-r1) achieve higher accuracy, all models exhibit errors in spatial reasoning, strategic planning, and arithmetic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T09:07:32Z)
• Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models: Assessing Logical and Arithmetic Errors across Wide Numerical Ranges [0.0]
  We introduce GSM-Ranges, a dataset generator that systematically perturbs numerical values in math problems to assess model robustness across varying numerical scales. We also propose a novel grading methodology that distinguishes between logical and non-logical errors, offering a more precise evaluation of reasoning processes beyond computational accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-12T09:53:10Z)
• Error Classification of Large Language Models on Math Word Problems: A Dynamically Adaptive Framework [64.83955753606443]
  Math Word Problems serve as a crucial benchmark for evaluating Large Language Models' reasoning abilities. Current error classification methods rely on static and predefined categories. We introduce MWPES-300K, a comprehensive dataset containing 304,865 error samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-26T16:17:57Z)
• ATTNChecker: Highly-Optimized Fault Tolerant Attention for Large Language Model Training [14.178223242134166]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in various natural language processing tasks. LLMs are susceptible to faults, particularly in the attention mechanism, which is a critical component of transformer-based LLMs. We propose ATTNChecker, the first Algorithm-Based Fault Tolerance (ABFT) technique tailored for the attention mechanism in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T15:52:45Z)
• Subtle Errors Matter: Preference Learning via Error-injected Self-editing [59.405145971637204]
  We propose a novel preference learning framework called eRror-Injected Self-Editing (RISE) RISE injects predefined subtle errors into partial tokens of correct solutions to construct hard pairs for error mitigation. Experiments validate the effectiveness of RISE, with preference learning on Qwen2-7B-Instruct yielding notable improvements of 3.0% on GSM8K and 7.9% on MATH.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T07:43:38Z)
• Improving LLM Reasoning through Scaling Inference Computation with Collaborative Verification [52.095460362197336]
  Large language models (LLMs) struggle with consistent and accurate reasoning. LLMs are trained primarily on correct solutions, reducing their ability to detect and learn from errors. We propose a novel collaborative method integrating Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and Program-of-Thought (PoT) solutions for verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-05T05:21:48Z)
• S^3cMath: Spontaneous Step-level Self-correction Makes Large Language Models Better Mathematical Reasoners [23.713779973116733]
  Self-correction is a method that can stimulate the potential reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) We propose S$3$c-Math, which are able to perform Spontaneous Step-level Self-correction for Mathematical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-03T01:40:21Z)
• Anomaly Detection of Tabular Data Using LLMs [54.470648484612866]
  We show that pre-trained large language models (LLMs) are zero-shot batch-level anomaly detectors. We propose an end-to-end fine-tuning strategy to bring out the potential of LLMs in detecting real anomalies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T04:17:03Z)
• Advancing Anomaly Detection: Non-Semantic Financial Data Encoding with LLMs [49.57641083688934]
  We introduce a novel approach to anomaly detection in financial data using Large Language Models (LLMs) embeddings. Our experiments demonstrate that LLMs contribute valuable information to anomaly detection as our models outperform the baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T20:19:09Z)
• Understanding and Mitigating Classification Errors Through Interpretable Token Patterns [58.91023283103762]
  Characterizing errors in easily interpretable terms gives insight into whether a classifier is prone to making systematic errors. We propose to discover those patterns of tokens that distinguish correct and erroneous predictions. We show that our method, Premise, performs well in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-18T00:24:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.