FairDiverse: A Comprehensive Toolkit for Fair and Diverse Information Retrieval Algorithms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.11883v1
• Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 15:11:09 GMT
• Title: FairDiverse: A Comprehensive Toolkit for Fair and Diverse Information Retrieval Algorithms
• Authors: Chen Xu, Zhirui Deng, Clara Rus, Xiaopeng Ye, Yuanna Liu, Jun Xu, Zhicheng Dou, Ji-Rong Wen, Maarten de Rijke,
• Abstract summary: We present FairDiverse, an open-source and standardized toolkit for evaluating fairness- and diversity-aware algorithms in information retrieval (IR) FairDiverse offers a framework for integrating fair and diverse methods, including pre-processing, in-processing, and post-processing techniques, at different stages of the IR pipeline. The toolkit supports the evaluation of 28 fairness and diversity algorithms across 16 base models, covering two core IR tasks.
• Score: 87.76363121804235
• License:
• Abstract: In modern information retrieval (IR). achieving more than just accuracy is essential to sustaining a healthy ecosystem, especially when addressing fairness and diversity considerations. To meet these needs, various datasets, algorithms, and evaluation frameworks have been introduced. However, these algorithms are often tested across diverse metrics, datasets, and experimental setups, leading to inconsistencies and difficulties in direct comparisons. This highlights the need for a comprehensive IR toolkit that enables standardized evaluation of fairness- and diversity-aware algorithms across different IR tasks. To address this challenge, we present FairDiverse, an open-source and standardized toolkit. FairDiverse offers a framework for integrating fair and diverse methods, including pre-processing, in-processing, and post-processing techniques, at different stages of the IR pipeline. The toolkit supports the evaluation of 28 fairness and diversity algorithms across 16 base models, covering two core IR tasks (search and recommendation) thereby establishing a comprehensive benchmark. Moreover, FairDiverse is highly extensible, providing multiple APIs that empower IR researchers to swiftly develop and evaluate their own fairness and diversity aware models, while ensuring fair comparisons with existing baselines. The project is open-sourced and available on https://github.com/XuChen0427/FairDiverse.

Related papers

• XTrack: Multimodal Training Boosts RGB-X Video Object Trackers [88.72203975896558]
  It is crucial to ensure that knowledge gained from multimodal sensing is effectively shared. Similar samples across different modalities have more knowledge to share than otherwise. We propose a method for RGB-X tracker during inference, with an average +3% precision improvement over the current SOTA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T03:00:58Z)
• TFB: Towards Comprehensive and Fair Benchmarking of Time Series Forecasting Methods [27.473935782550388]
  Time series are generated in diverse domains such as economic, traffic, health, and energy. We propose TFB, an automated benchmark for Time Series Forecasting (TSF) methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T12:37:57Z)
• FFB: A Fair Fairness Benchmark for In-Processing Group Fairness Methods [84.1077756698332]
  This paper introduces the Fair Fairness Benchmark (textsfFFB), a benchmarking framework for in-processing group fairness methods. We provide a comprehensive analysis of state-of-the-art methods to ensure different notions of group fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T19:51:28Z)
• FARF: A Fair and Adaptive Random Forests Classifier [34.94595588778864]
  We propose a flexible ensemble algorithm for fair decision-making in the more challenging context of evolving online settings. This algorithm, called FARF (Fair and Adaptive Random Forests), is based on using online component classifiers and updating them according to the current distribution. Experiments on real-world discriminated data streams demonstrate the utility of FARF.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-17T02:06:54Z)
• MultiFair: Multi-Group Fairness in Machine Learning [52.24956510371455]
  We study multi-group fairness in machine learning (MultiFair) We propose a generic end-to-end algorithmic framework to solve it. Our proposed framework is generalizable to many different settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-24T02:30:22Z)
• Interpretable Multi-dataset Evaluation for Named Entity Recognition [110.64368106131062]
  We present a general methodology for interpretable evaluation for the named entity recognition (NER) task. The proposed evaluation method enables us to interpret the differences in models and datasets, as well as the interplay between them. By making our analysis tool available, we make it easy for future researchers to run similar analyses and drive progress in this area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-13T10:53:27Z)
• Towards Model-Agnostic Post-Hoc Adjustment for Balancing Ranking Fairness and Algorithm Utility [54.179859639868646]
  Bipartite ranking aims to learn a scoring function that ranks positive individuals higher than negative ones from labeled data. There have been rising concerns on whether the learned scoring function can cause systematic disparity across different protected groups. We propose a model post-processing framework for balancing them in the bipartite ranking scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T10:08:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.