Whose story is it? Personalizing story generation by inferring author styles
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.13028v1
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 16:45:41 GMT
- Title: Whose story is it? Personalizing story generation by inferring author styles
- Authors: Nischal Ashok Kumar, Chau Minh Pham, Mohit Iyyer, Andrew Lan,
- Abstract summary: We propose a novel two-stage pipeline for personalized story generation.
Our approach infers an author's implicit story-writing characteristics from their past work and organizes them into an Author Writing Sheet.
The second stage uses this sheet to simulate the author's persona through tailored persona descriptions and personalized story writing rules.
- Score: 30.264355446431363
- License:
- Abstract: Personalization has become essential for improving user experience in interactive writing and educational applications, yet its potential in story generation remains largely unexplored. In this work, we propose a novel two-stage pipeline for personalized story generation. Our approach first infers an author's implicit story-writing characteristics from their past work and organizes them into an Author Writing Sheet, inspired by narrative theory. The second stage uses this sheet to simulate the author's persona through tailored persona descriptions and personalized story writing rules. To enable and validate our approach, we construct Mythos, a dataset of 590 stories from 64 authors across five distinct sources that reflect diverse story-writing settings. A head-to-head comparison with a non-personalized baseline demonstrates our pipeline's effectiveness in generating high-quality personalized stories. Our personalized stories achieve a 75 percent win rate (versus 14 percent for the baseline and 11 percent ties) in capturing authors' writing style based on their past works. Human evaluation highlights the high quality of our Author Writing Sheet and provides valuable insights into the personalized story generation task. Notable takeaways are that writings from certain sources, such as Reddit, are easier to personalize than others, like AO3, while narrative aspects, like Creativity and Language Use, are easier to personalize than others, like Plot.
Related papers
- "It was 80% me, 20% AI": Seeking Authenticity in Co-Writing with Large Language Models [97.22914355737676]
We examine whether and how writers want to preserve their authentic voice when co-writing with AI tools.
Our findings illuminate conceptions of authenticity in human-AI co-creation.
Readers' responses showed less concern about human-AI co-writing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-20T04:42:32Z) - Agents' Room: Narrative Generation through Multi-step Collaboration [54.98886593802834]
We propose a generation framework inspired by narrative theory that decomposes narrative writing into subtasks tackled by specialized agents.
We show that Agents' Room generates stories preferred by expert evaluators over those produced by baseline systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-03T15:44:42Z) - Generating Visual Stories with Grounded and Coreferent Characters [63.07511918366848]
We present the first model capable of predicting visual stories with consistently grounded and coreferent character mentions.
Our model is finetuned on a new dataset which we build on top of the widely used VIST benchmark.
We also propose new evaluation metrics to measure the richness of characters and coreference in stories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-20T14:56:33Z) - The GPT-WritingPrompts Dataset: A Comparative Analysis of Character Portrayal in Short Stories [17.184517720465404]
We quantify and compare the emotional and descriptive features of storytelling from both generative processes, human and machine, along a set of six dimensions.
We find that generated stories differ significantly from human stories along all six dimensions, and that human and machine generations display similar biases when grouped according to the narrative point-of-view and gender of the main protagonist.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-24T16:24:18Z) - Conveying the Predicted Future to Users: A Case Study of Story Plot
Prediction [14.036772394560238]
We create a system that produces a short description that narrates a predicted plot.
Our goal is to assist writers in crafting a consistent and compelling story arc.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-17T20:10:55Z) - Computational Storytelling and Emotions: A Survey [56.95572957863576]
This survey paper is intended to summarize and contribute to the development of research being conducted on the relationship between stories and emotions.
We believe creativity research is not to replace humans with computers, but to find a way of collaboration between humans and computers to enhance the creativity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-23T00:21:59Z) - Persona-Guided Planning for Controlling the Protagonist's Persona in
Story Generation [71.24817035071176]
We propose a planning-based generation model named CONPER to explicitly model the relationship between personas and events.
Both automatic and manual evaluation results demonstrate that CONPER outperforms state-of-the-art baselines for generating more coherent and persona-controllable stories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-22T13:45:02Z) - Stylized Story Generation with Style-Guided Planning [38.791298336259146]
We propose a new task, stylized story gen-eration, namely generating stories with speci-fied style given a leading context.
Our model can controllably generateemo-tion-driven or event-driven stories based on the ROCStories dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-18T15:55:38Z) - Collaborative Storytelling with Large-scale Neural Language Models [6.0794985566317425]
We introduce the task of collaborative storytelling, where an artificial intelligence agent and a person collaborate to create a unique story by taking turns adding to it.
We present a collaborative storytelling system which works with a human storyteller to create a story by generating new utterances based on the story so far.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-20T04:36:54Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.