Unbiased Collaborative Filtering with Fair Sampling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.13840v2
• Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 07:42:28 GMT
• Title: Unbiased Collaborative Filtering with Fair Sampling
• Authors: Jiahao Liu, Dongsheng Li, Hansu Gu, Peng Zhang, Tun Lu, Li Shang, Ning Gu,
• Abstract summary: We show that popularity bias arises from the influence of propensity factors during training.<n>We propose a fair sampling (FS) method that ensures each user and each item has an equal likelihood of being selected as both positive and negative instances.
• Score: 31.8123420283795
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recommender systems leverage extensive user interaction data to model preferences; however, directly modeling these data may introduce biases that disproportionately favor popular items. In this paper, we demonstrate that popularity bias arises from the influence of propensity factors during training. Building on this insight, we propose a fair sampling (FS) method that ensures each user and each item has an equal likelihood of being selected as both positive and negative instances, thereby mitigating the influence of propensity factors. The proposed FS method does not require estimating propensity scores, thus avoiding the risk of failing to fully eliminate popularity bias caused by estimation inaccuracies. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed FS method achieves state-of-the-art performance in both point-wise and pair-wise recommendation tasks. The code implementation is available at https://github.com/jhliu0807/Fair-Sampling.

Related papers

• Variational Bayesian Personalized Ranking [39.24591060825056]
  Variational BPR is a novel and easily implementable learning objective that integrates likelihood optimization, noise reduction, and popularity debiasing. We introduce an attention-based latent interest prototype contrastive mechanism, replacing instance-level contrastive learning, to effectively reduce noise from problematic samples. Empirically, we demonstrate the effectiveness of Variational BPR on popular backbone recommendation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T04:22:01Z)
• Unintentional Unalignment: Likelihood Displacement in Direct Preference Optimization [60.176008034221404]
  Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and its variants are increasingly used for aligning language models with human preferences. Prior work has observed that the likelihood of preferred responses often decreases during training. We demonstrate that likelihood displacement can be catastrophic, shifting probability mass from preferred responses to responses with an opposite meaning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T14:22:44Z)
• Correcting for Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems via Item Loss Equalization [1.7771454131646311]
  A small set of popular items dominate the recommendation results due to their high interaction rates. This phenomenon disproportionately benefits users with mainstream tastes while neglecting those with niche interests. We propose an in-processing approach to address this issue by intervening in the training process of recommendation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T08:34:18Z)
• Going Beyond Popularity and Positivity Bias: Correcting for Multifactorial Bias in Recommender Systems [74.47680026838128]
  Two typical forms of bias in user interaction data with recommender systems (RSs) are popularity bias and positivity bias. We consider multifactorial selection bias affected by both item and rating value factors. We propose smoothing and alternating gradient descent techniques to reduce variance and improve the robustness of its optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T12:18:21Z)
• Take Care of Your Prompt Bias! Investigating and Mitigating Prompt Bias in Factual Knowledge Extraction [56.17020601803071]
  Recent research shows that pre-trained language models (PLMs) suffer from "prompt bias" in factual knowledge extraction. This paper aims to improve the reliability of existing benchmarks by thoroughly investigating and mitigating prompt bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T02:04:35Z)
• Debiased Model-based Interactive Recommendation [22.007617148466807]
  We develop a model called textbfidentifiable textbfDebiased textbfModel-based textbfInteractive textbfRecommendation (textbfiDMIR in short) For the first drawback, we devise a debiased causal world model based on the causal mechanism of the time-varying recommendation generation process with identification guarantees. For the second drawback, we devise a debiased contrastive policy, which coincides with the debiased contrastive learning and avoids sampling bias
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-24T14:10:04Z)
• Causality and Independence Enhancement for Biased Node Classification [56.38828085943763]
  We propose a novel Causality and Independence Enhancement (CIE) framework, applicable to various graph neural networks (GNNs) Our approach estimates causal and spurious features at the node representation level and mitigates the influence of spurious correlations. Our approach CIE not only significantly enhances the performance of GNNs but outperforms state-of-the-art debiased node classification methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T13:56:24Z)
• Automatic Debiased Learning from Positive, Unlabeled, and Exposure Data [11.217084610985674]
  We address the issue of binary classification from positive and unlabeled data (PU classification) with a selection bias in the positive data. This scenario represents a conceptual framework for many practical applications, such as recommender systems. We propose a method to identify the function of interest using a strong ignorability assumption and develop an Automatic Debiased PUE'' (ADPUE) learning method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-08T18:45:22Z)
• Delving into Identify-Emphasize Paradigm for Combating Unknown Bias [52.76758938921129]
  We propose an effective bias-conflicting scoring method (ECS) to boost the identification accuracy. We also propose gradient alignment (GA) to balance the contributions of the mined bias-aligned and bias-conflicting samples. Experiments are conducted on multiple datasets in various settings, demonstrating that the proposed solution can mitigate the impact of unknown biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T14:50:24Z)
• On Comparing Fair Classifiers under Data Bias [42.43344286660331]
  We study the effect of varying data biases on the accuracy and fairness of fair classifiers. Our experiments show how to integrate a measure of data bias risk in the existing fairness dashboards for real-world deployments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-12T13:04:46Z)
• Feature-Level Debiased Natural Language Understanding [86.8751772146264]
  Existing natural language understanding (NLU) models often rely on dataset biases to achieve high performance on specific datasets. We propose debiasing contrastive learning (DCT) to mitigate biased latent features and neglect the dynamic nature of bias. DCT outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on out-of-distribution datasets while maintaining in-distribution performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-11T06:16:14Z)
• Cross Pairwise Ranking for Unbiased Item Recommendation [57.71258289870123]
  We develop a new learning paradigm named Cross Pairwise Ranking (CPR) CPR achieves unbiased recommendation without knowing the exposure mechanism. We prove in theory that this way offsets the influence of user/item propensity on the learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T09:20:27Z)
• Unbiased Pairwise Learning to Rank in Recommender Systems [4.058828240864671]
  Unbiased learning to rank algorithms are appealing candidates and have already been applied in many applications with single categorical labels. We propose a novel unbiased LTR algorithm to tackle the challenges, which innovatively models position bias in the pairwise fashion. Experiment results on public benchmark datasets and internal live traffic show the superior results of the proposed method for both categorical and continuous labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-25T06:04:59Z)
• Bias-Tolerant Fair Classification [20.973916494320246]
  label bias and selection bias are two reasons in data that will hinder the fairness of machine-learning outcomes. We propose a Bias-TolerantFAirRegularizedLoss (B-FARL) which tries to regain the benefits using data affected by label bias and selection bias. B-FARL takes the biased data as input, calls a model that approximates the one trained with fair but latent data, and thus prevents discrimination without constraints required.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-07T13:31:38Z)
• Debiasing classifiers: is reality at variance with expectation? [9.730485257882433]
  We show that debiasers often fail in practice to generalize out-of-sample data, and can in fact make fairness worse rather than better. Considering fairness--performance trade-offs justifies the counterintuitive notion that partial debiasing can actually yield better results in practice on out-of-sample data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T17:00:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.