Aligning LLMs to Ask Good Questions A Case Study in Clinical Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.14860v1
• Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 18:59:31 GMT
• Title: Aligning LLMs to Ask Good Questions A Case Study in Clinical Reasoning
• Authors: Shuyue Stella Li, Jimin Mun, Faeze Brahman, Jonathan S. Ilgen, Yulia Tsvetkov, Maarten Sap,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) often fail to ask effective questions under uncertainty. We present ALFA, a framework that improves LLM question-asking by decomposing the notion of a "good" question into a set of theory-grounded attributes.
• Score: 39.750234944933666
• License:
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) often fail to ask effective questions under uncertainty, making them unreliable in domains where proactive information-gathering is essential for decisionmaking. We present ALFA, a framework that improves LLM question-asking by (i) decomposing the notion of a "good" question into a set of theory-grounded attributes (e.g., clarity, relevance), (ii) controllably synthesizing attribute-specific question variations, and (iii) aligning models via preference-based optimization to explicitly learn to ask better questions along these fine-grained attributes. Focusing on clinical reasoning as a case study, we introduce the MediQ-AskDocs dataset, composed of 17k real-world clinical interactions augmented with 80k attribute-specific preference pairs of follow-up questions, as well as a novel expert-annotated interactive healthcare QA task to evaluate question-asking abilities. Models aligned with ALFA reduce diagnostic errors by 56.6% on MediQ-AskDocs compared to SOTA instruction-tuned LLMs, with a question-level win-rate of 64.4% and strong generalizability. Our findings suggest that explicitly guiding question-asking with structured, fine-grained attributes offers a scalable path to improve LLMs, especially in expert application domains.

Related papers

• Compound-QA: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Compound Questions [10.783827859678892]
  We introduce Compound Question Synthesis (CQ-Syn) to create the Compound-QA benchmark. This benchmark is derived from existing QA datasets, annotated with proprietary large language models. It evaluates the LLM capability in terms of three dimensions including understanding, reasoning, and knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T13:12:29Z)
• Exploring Language Model Generalization in Low-Resource Extractive QA [57.14068405860034]
  We investigate Extractive Question Answering (EQA) with Large Language Models (LLMs) under domain drift. We devise a series of experiments to explain the performance gap empirically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T05:06:43Z)
• Assessing and Enhancing Large Language Models in Rare Disease Question-answering [64.32570472692187]
  We introduce a rare disease question-answering (ReDis-QA) dataset to evaluate the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in diagnosing rare diseases. We collected 1360 high-quality question-answer pairs within the ReDis-QA dataset, covering 205 rare diseases. We then benchmarked several open-source LLMs, revealing that diagnosing rare diseases remains a significant challenge for these models. Experiment results demonstrate that ReCOP can effectively improve the accuracy of LLMs on the ReDis-QA dataset by an average of 8%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T21:09:09Z)
• GMAI-MMBench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Evaluation Benchmark Towards General Medical AI [67.09501109871351]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) are capable of handling diverse data types such as imaging, text, and physiological signals. GMAI-MMBench is the most comprehensive general medical AI benchmark with well-categorized data structure and multi-perceptual granularity to date. It is constructed from 284 datasets across 38 medical image modalities, 18 clinical-related tasks, 18 departments, and 4 perceptual granularities in a Visual Question Answering (VQA) format.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T17:59:21Z)
• MACAROON: Training Vision-Language Models To Be Your Engaged Partners [95.32771929749514]
  Large vision-language models (LVLMs) generate detailed responses even when questions are ambiguous or unlabeled. In this study, we aim to shift LVLMs from passive answer providers to proactive engaged partners. We introduce MACAROON, self-iMaginAtion for ContrAstive pReference OptimizatiON, which instructs LVLMs to autonomously generate contrastive response pairs for unlabeled questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T09:27:33Z)
• MediQ: Question-Asking LLMs and a Benchmark for Reliable Interactive Clinical Reasoning [36.400896909161006]
  We develop systems that proactively ask questions to gather more information and respond reliably. We introduce a benchmark - MediQ - to evaluate question-asking ability in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T01:32:52Z)
• Crafting Interpretable Embeddings by Asking LLMs Questions [89.49960984640363]
  Large language models (LLMs) have rapidly improved text embeddings for a growing array of natural-language processing tasks. We introduce question-answering embeddings (QA-Emb), embeddings where each feature represents an answer to a yes/no question asked to an LLM. We use QA-Emb to flexibly generate interpretable models for predicting fMRI voxel responses to language stimuli.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T22:30:29Z)
• BIDER: Bridging Knowledge Inconsistency for Efficient Retrieval-Augmented LLMs via Key Supporting Evidence [23.55601157586831]
  This paper introduces BIDER, an approach that refines retrieval documents into Key Supporting Evidence. We train BIDER by learning from crafting KSE, while maximizing its output to align with LLM's information acquisition preferences. Evaluations show BIDER boosts LLMs' answer quality by 7% while reducing input content length in retrieval documents by 80%, outperforming existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T14:28:31Z)
• Aligning Large Language Models for Clinical Tasks [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable adaptability, showcasing their capacity to excel in tasks for which they were not explicitly trained. We propose an alignment strategy for medical question-answering, known as 'expand-guess-refine' A preliminary analysis of this method demonstrated outstanding performance, achieving a score of 70.63% on a subset of questions sourced from the USMLE dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T10:20:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.