Latent Factor Models Meets Instructions: Goal-conditioned Latent Factor Discovery without Task Supervision

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15147v2
• Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 17:01:50 GMT
• Title: Latent Factor Models Meets Instructions: Goal-conditioned Latent Factor Discovery without Task Supervision
• Authors: Zhouhang Xie, Tushar Khot, Bhavana Dalvi Mishra, Harshit Surana, Julian McAuley, Peter Clark, Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder,
• Abstract summary: Instruct-LF is a goal-oriented latent factor discovery system.<n>It integrates instruction-following ability with statistical models to handle noisy datasets.
• Score: 50.45597801390757
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Instruction-following LLMs have recently allowed systems to discover hidden concepts from a collection of unstructured documents based on a natural language description of the purpose of the discovery (i.e., goal). Still, the quality of the discovered concepts remains mixed, as it depends heavily on LLM's reasoning ability and drops when the data is noisy or beyond LLM's knowledge. We present Instruct-LF, a goal-oriented latent factor discovery system that integrates LLM's instruction-following ability with statistical models to handle large, noisy datasets where LLM reasoning alone falls short. Instruct-LF uses LLMs to propose fine-grained, goal-related properties from documents, estimates their presence across the dataset, and applies gradient-based optimization to uncover hidden factors, where each factor is represented by a cluster of co-occurring properties. We evaluate latent factors produced by Instruct-LF on movie recommendation, text-world navigation, and legal document categorization tasks. These interpretable representations improve downstream task performance by 5-52% than the best baselines and were preferred 1.8 times as often as the best alternative, on average, in human evaluation.

Related papers

• LLMs as Data Annotators: How Close Are We to Human Performance [47.61698665650761]
  Manual annotation of data is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and costly. In-context learning (ICL) in which some examples related to the task are given in the prompt can lead to inefficiencies and suboptimal model performance. This paper presents experiments comparing several LLMs, considering different embedding models, across various datasets for the Named Entity Recognition (NER) task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T11:11:07Z)
• LLM-Lasso: A Robust Framework for Domain-Informed Feature Selection and Regularization [59.75242204923353]
  We introduce LLM-Lasso, a framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) to guide feature selection in Lasso regression.<n>LLMs generate penalty factors for each feature, which are converted into weights for the Lasso penalty using a simple, tunable model.<n>Features identified as more relevant by the LLM receive lower penalties, increasing their likelihood of being retained in the final model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-15T02:55:22Z)
• Potential and Perils of Large Language Models as Judges of Unstructured Textual Data [0.631976908971572]
  This research investigates the effectiveness of LLM-as-judge models to evaluate the thematic alignment of summaries generated by other LLMs.<n>Our findings reveal that while LLM-as-judge offer a scalable solution comparable to human raters, humans may still excel at detecting subtle, context-specific nuances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-14T14:49:14Z)
• Scoring with Large Language Models: A Study on Measuring Empathy of Responses in Dialogues [3.2162648244439684]
  We develop a framework for investigating how effective Large Language Models are at measuring and scoring empathy of responses in dialogues. Our strategy is to approximate the performance of state-of-the-art and fine-tuned LLMs with explicit and explainable features. Our results show that when only using embeddings, it is possible to achieve performance close to that of generic LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-28T20:37:57Z)
• Probing Ranking LLMs: Mechanistic Interpretability in Information Retrieval [22.875174888476295]
  We study the workings of state-of-the-art, fine-tuning-based passage-reranking transformer networks. Our approach involves a probing-based, layer-by-layer analysis of neurons within ranking LLMs. We identify individual or groups of known human-engineered and semantic features within the network's activations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T08:20:10Z)
• Beyond Binary: Towards Fine-Grained LLM-Generated Text Detection via Role Recognition and Involvement Measurement [51.601916604301685]
  Large language models (LLMs) generate content that can undermine trust in online discourse.<n>Current methods often focus on binary classification, failing to address the complexities of real-world scenarios like human-LLM collaboration.<n>To move beyond binary classification and address these challenges, we propose a new paradigm for detecting LLM-generated content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T08:14:10Z)
• ELF-Gym: Evaluating Large Language Models Generated Features for Tabular Prediction [33.03433653251314]
  We propose ELF-Gym, a framework for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) We curated a new dataset from historical Kaggle competitions, including 251 "golden" features used by top-performing teams. We empirically demonstrate that, in the best-case scenario, LLMs can semantically capture approximately 56% of the golden features, but at the more demanding implementation level this overlap drops to 13%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T13:59:33Z)
• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• CLAMBER: A Benchmark of Identifying and Clarifying Ambiguous Information Needs in Large Language Models [60.59638232596912]
  We introduce CLAMBER, a benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) Building upon the taxonomy, we construct 12K high-quality data to assess the strengths, weaknesses, and potential risks of various off-the-shelf LLMs. Our findings indicate the limited practical utility of current LLMs in identifying and clarifying ambiguous user queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-20T14:34:01Z)
• PiCO: Peer Review in LLMs based on the Consistency Optimization [48.48819141999387]
  We use peer-review mechanisms to measure large language models (LLMs) automatically. We formalize it as a constrained optimization problem, intending to maximize the consistency of each LLM's capabilities and scores. We propose three metrics called PEN, CIN, and LIS to evaluate the gap in aligning human rankings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T18:49:26Z)
• Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Models [52.98743860365194]
  We propose a new fine-tuning method called Self-Play fIne-tuNing (SPIN) At the heart of SPIN lies a self-play mechanism, where the LLM refines its capability by playing against instances of itself. This sheds light on the promise of self-play, enabling the achievement of human-level performance in LLMs without the need for expert opponents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T18:53:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.