Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.16681v1
• Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 18:54:15 GMT
• Title: Are Sparse Autoencoders Useful? A Case Study in Sparse Probing
• Authors: Subhash Kantamneni, Joshua Engels, Senthooran Rajamanoharan, Max Tegmark, Neel Nanda,
• Abstract summary: Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are a popular method for interpreting concepts represented in large language model (LLM) activations.<n>One alternative source of evidence would be demonstrating that SAEs improve performance on downstream tasks beyond existing baselines.<n>We test this by applying SAEs to the real-world task of LLM activation probing in four regimes.
• Score: 6.836374436707495
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are a popular method for interpreting concepts represented in large language model (LLM) activations. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the validity of their interpretations due to the lack of a ground truth for the concepts used by an LLM, and a growing number of works have presented problems with current SAEs. One alternative source of evidence would be demonstrating that SAEs improve performance on downstream tasks beyond existing baselines. We test this by applying SAEs to the real-world task of LLM activation probing in four regimes: data scarcity, class imbalance, label noise, and covariate shift. Due to the difficulty of detecting concepts in these challenging settings, we hypothesize that SAEs' basis of interpretable, concept-level latents should provide a useful inductive bias. However, although SAEs occasionally perform better than baselines on individual datasets, we are unable to design ensemble methods combining SAEs with baselines that consistently outperform ensemble methods solely using baselines. Additionally, although SAEs initially appear promising for identifying spurious correlations, detecting poor dataset quality, and training multi-token probes, we are able to achieve similar results with simple non-SAE baselines as well. Though we cannot discount SAEs' utility on other tasks, our findings highlight the shortcomings of current SAEs and the need to rigorously evaluate interpretability methods on downstream tasks with strong baselines.

Related papers

• AxBench: Steering LLMs? Even Simple Baselines Outperform Sparse Autoencoders [73.37603699731329]
  We introduce AxBench, a large-scale benchmark for steering and concept detection.<n>For steering, we find that prompting outperforms all existing methods, followed by finetuning.<n>For concept detection, representation-based methods such as difference-in-means, perform the best.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-28T18:51:24Z)
• Decoding Dark Matter: Specialized Sparse Autoencoders for Interpreting Rare Concepts in Foundation Models [26.748765050034876]
  Specialized Sparse Autoencoders (SSAEs) illuminate elusive dark matter features by focusing on specific. We show that SSAEs effectively capture subdomain tail concepts, exceeding the capabilities of general-purpose SAEs. We showcase the practical utility of SSAEs in a case study on the Bias in Bios dataset, where SSAEs achieve a 12.5% increase in worst-group classification accuracy when applied to remove spurious gender information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T17:09:34Z)
• SAGE: Scalable Ground Truth Evaluations for Large Sparse Autoencoders [7.065809768803578]
  We introduce SAGE: Scalable Autoencoder Ground-truth Evaluation, a ground truth evaluation framework for SAEs. We demonstrate that our method can automatically identify task-specific activations and compute ground truth features at these points. Our framework paves the way for generalizable, large-scale evaluations of SAEs in interpretability research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T21:42:39Z)
• Uncertainty Aware Learning for Language Model Alignment [97.36361196793929]
  We propose uncertainty-aware learning (UAL) to improve the model alignment of different task scenarios. We implement UAL in a simple fashion -- adaptively setting the label smoothing value of training according to the uncertainty of individual samples. Experiments on widely used benchmarks demonstrate that our UAL significantly and consistently outperforms standard supervised fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T11:37:45Z)
• CSS: Contrastive Semantic Similarity for Uncertainty Quantification of LLMs [1.515687944002438]
  We propose Contrastive Semantic Similarity, a module to obtain similarity features for measuring uncertainty for text pairs. We conduct extensive experiments with three large language models (LLMs) on several benchmark question-answering datasets. Results show that our proposed method performs better in estimating reliable responses of LLMs than comparable baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T11:35:44Z)
• Instruction Tuning with Retrieval-based Examples Ranking for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis [7.458853474864602]
  Aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) identifies sentiment information related to specific aspects and provides deeper market insights to businesses and organizations. Recent studies have proposed using fixed examples for instruction tuning to reformulate ABSA as a generation task. This study proposes an instruction learning method with retrieval-based example ranking for ABSA tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T10:39:10Z)
• Simple Ingredients for Offline Reinforcement Learning [86.1988266277766]
  offline reinforcement learning algorithms have proven effective on datasets highly connected to the target downstream task. We show that existing methods struggle with diverse data: their performance considerably deteriorates as data collected for related but different tasks is simply added to the offline buffer. We show that scale, more than algorithmic considerations, is the key factor influencing performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T18:57:53Z)
• Enhancing Vision-Language Few-Shot Adaptation with Negative Learning [11.545127156146368]
  We propose a Simple yet effective Negative Learning approach, SimNL, to more efficiently exploit task-specific knowledge. To this issue, we introduce a plug-and-play few-shot instance reweighting technique to mitigate noisy outliers. Our extensive experimental results validate that the proposed SimNL outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods on both few-shot learning and domain generalization tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T17:59:39Z)
• Robust Survival Analysis with Adversarial Regularization [6.001304967469112]
  Survival Analysis (SA) models the time until an event occurs. Recent work shows that Neural Networks (NNs) can capture complex relationships in SA. We leverage NN verification advances to create algorithms for robust, fully-parametric survival models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-26T12:18:31Z)
• Revisiting Out-of-distribution Robustness in NLP: Benchmark, Analysis, and LLMs Evaluations [111.88727295707454]
  This paper reexamines the research on out-of-distribution (OOD) robustness in the field of NLP. We propose a benchmark construction protocol that ensures clear differentiation and challenging distribution shifts. We conduct experiments on pre-trained language models for analysis and evaluation of OOD robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T17:47:03Z)
• Sentiment Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Reality Check [69.97942065617664]
  This paper investigates the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in performing various sentiment analysis tasks. We evaluate performance across 13 tasks on 26 datasets and compare the results against small language models (SLMs) trained on domain-specific datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T10:45:25Z)
• Can Active Learning Preemptively Mitigate Fairness Issues? [66.84854430781097]
  dataset bias is one of the prevailing causes of unfairness in machine learning. We study whether models trained with uncertainty-based ALs are fairer in their decisions with respect to a protected class. We also explore the interaction of algorithmic fairness methods such as gradient reversal (GRAD) and BALD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-14T14:20:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.