Towards Optimal Adversarial Robust Reinforcement Learning with Infinity Measurement Error

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.16734v1
• Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 22:16:01 GMT
• Title: Towards Optimal Adversarial Robust Reinforcement Learning with Infinity Measurement Error
• Authors: Haoran Li, Zicheng Zhang, Wang Luo, Congying Han, Jiayu Lv, Tiande Guo, Yudong Hu,
• Abstract summary: Recent research highlights the challenges of achieving state-adversarial robustness.<n>We introduce the Intrinsic State-adversarial Markov Decision Process (ISA-MDP)<n>We show that improving DRL robustness does not necessarily compromise performance in natural environments.
• Score: 9.473089575932375
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Ensuring the robustness of deep reinforcement learning (DRL) agents against adversarial attacks is critical for their trustworthy deployment. Recent research highlights the challenges of achieving state-adversarial robustness and suggests that an optimal robust policy (ORP) does not always exist, complicating the enforcement of strict robustness constraints. In this paper, we further explore the concept of ORP. We first introduce the Intrinsic State-adversarial Markov Decision Process (ISA-MDP), a novel formulation where adversaries cannot fundamentally alter the intrinsic nature of state observations. ISA-MDP, supported by empirical and theoretical evidence, universally characterizes decision-making under state-adversarial paradigms. We rigorously prove that within ISA-MDP, a deterministic and stationary ORP exists, aligning with the Bellman optimal policy. Our findings theoretically reveal that improving DRL robustness does not necessarily compromise performance in natural environments. Furthermore, we demonstrate the necessity of infinity measurement error (IME) in both $Q$-function and probability spaces to achieve ORP, unveiling vulnerabilities of previous DRL algorithms that rely on $1$-measurement errors. Motivated by these insights, we develop the Consistent Adversarial Robust Reinforcement Learning (CAR-RL) framework, which optimizes surrogates of IME. We apply CAR-RL to both value-based and policy-based DRL algorithms, achieving superior performance and validating our theoretical analysis.

Related papers

• Risk-Sensitive RL with Optimized Certainty Equivalents via Reduction to Standard RL [48.1726560631463]
  We study Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning with the Optimized Certainty Equivalent (OCE) risk. We propose two general meta-algorithms via reductions to standard RL. We show that it learns the optimal risk-sensitive policy while prior algorithms provably fail.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-10T21:45:12Z)
• Towards Optimal Adversarial Robust Q-learning with Bellman Infinity-error [9.473089575932375]
  Recent studies explore state-adversarial robustness and suggest the potential lack of an optimal robust policy (ORP) We prove the existence of a deterministic and stationary ORP that aligns with the Bellman optimal policy. This finding motivates us to train a Consistent Adversarial Robust Deep Q-Network (CAR-DQN) by minimizing a surrogate of Bellman Infinity-error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-03T14:25:33Z)
• Efficient Action Robust Reinforcement Learning with Probabilistic Policy Execution Uncertainty [43.55450683502937]
  In this paper, we focus on action robust RL with the probabilistic policy execution uncertainty. We establish the existence of an optimal policy on the action robust MDPs with probabilistic policy execution uncertainty. We also develop Action Robust Reinforcement Learning with Certificates (ARRLC) algorithm that minimax optimal regret and sample complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-15T00:26:51Z)
• On Practical Robust Reinforcement Learning: Practical Uncertainty Set and Double-Agent Algorithm [11.748284119769039]
  Robust reinforcement learning (RRL) aims at seeking a robust policy to optimize the worst case performance over an uncertainty set of Markov decision processes (MDPs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-11T08:52:09Z)
• Robust Entropy-regularized Markov Decision Processes [23.719568076996662]
  We study a robust version of the ER-MDP model, where the optimal policies are required to be robust. We show that essential properties that hold for the non-robust ER-MDP and robust unregularized MDP models also hold in our settings. We show how our framework and results can be integrated into different algorithmic schemes including value or (modified) policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-31T09:50:46Z)
• False Correlation Reduction for Offline Reinforcement Learning [115.11954432080749]
  We propose falSe COrrelation REduction (SCORE) for offline RL, a practically effective and theoretically provable algorithm. We empirically show that SCORE achieves the SoTA performance with 3.1x acceleration on various tasks in a standard benchmark (D4RL)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-24T15:34:03Z)
• Policy Smoothing for Provably Robust Reinforcement Learning [109.90239627115336]
  We study the provable robustness of reinforcement learning against norm-bounded adversarial perturbations of the inputs. We generate certificates that guarantee that the total reward obtained by the smoothed policy will not fall below a certain threshold under a norm-bounded adversarial of perturbation the input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-21T21:42:08Z)
• Combining Pessimism with Optimism for Robust and Efficient Model-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning [56.17667147101263]
  In real-world tasks, reinforcement learning agents encounter situations that are not present during training time. To ensure reliable performance, the RL agents need to exhibit robustness against worst-case situations. We propose the Robust Hallucinated Upper-Confidence RL (RH-UCRL) algorithm to provably solve this problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T16:50:17Z)
• Robust Reinforcement Learning on State Observations with Learned Optimal Adversary [86.0846119254031]
  We study the robustness of reinforcement learning with adversarially perturbed state observations. With a fixed agent policy, we demonstrate that an optimal adversary to perturb state observations can be found. For DRL settings, this leads to a novel empirical adversarial attack to RL agents via a learned adversary that is much stronger than previous ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-21T05:38:52Z)
• Robust Constrained-MDPs: Soft-Constrained Robust Policy Optimization under Model Uncertainty [9.246374019271935]
  We propose to merge the theory of constrained Markov decision process (CMDP) with the theory of robust Markov decision process (RMDP) This formulation allows us to design RL algorithms that are robust in performance, and provides constraint satisfaction guarantees. We first propose the general problem formulation under the concept of RCMDP, and then propose a Lagrangian formulation of the optimal problem, leading to a robust-constrained policy gradient RL algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-10T01:53:37Z)
• Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning against Adversarial Perturbations on State Observations [88.94162416324505]
  A deep reinforcement learning (DRL) agent observes its states through observations, which may contain natural measurement errors or adversarial noises. Since the observations deviate from the true states, they can mislead the agent into making suboptimal actions. We show that naively applying existing techniques on improving robustness for classification tasks, like adversarial training, is ineffective for many RL tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-19T17:59:59Z)
• Distributional Robustness and Regularization in Reinforcement Learning [62.23012916708608]
  We introduce a new regularizer for empirical value functions and show that it lower bounds the Wasserstein distributionally robust value function. It suggests using regularization as a practical tool for dealing with $textitexternal uncertainty$ in reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-05T19:56:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.