AlphaAgent: LLM-Driven Alpha Mining with Regularized Exploration to Counteract Alpha Decay

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.16789v2
• Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 01:44:51 GMT
• Title: AlphaAgent: LLM-Driven Alpha Mining with Regularized Exploration to Counteract Alpha Decay
• Authors: Ziyi Tang, Zechuan Chen, Jiarui Yang, Jiayao Mai, Yongsen Zheng, Keze Wang, Jinrui Chen, Liang Lin,
• Abstract summary: We propose AlphaAgent, an autonomous framework that integrates Large Language Models with ad hoc regularizations for mining decay-resistant alpha factors.<n>AlphaAgent consistently delivers significant alpha in Chinese CSI 500 and US S&P 500 markets over the past four years.<n> Notably, AlphaAgent showcases remarkable resistance to alpha decay, elevating the potential for yielding powerful factors.
• Score: 43.50447460231601
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Alpha mining, a critical component in quantitative investment, focuses on discovering predictive signals for future asset returns in increasingly complex financial markets. However, the pervasive issue of alpha decay, where factors lose their predictive power over time, poses a significant challenge for alpha mining. Traditional methods like genetic programming face rapid alpha decay from overfitting and complexity, while approaches driven by Large Language Models (LLMs), despite their promise, often rely too heavily on existing knowledge, creating homogeneous factors that worsen crowding and accelerate decay. To address this challenge, we propose AlphaAgent, an autonomous framework that effectively integrates LLM agents with ad hoc regularizations for mining decay-resistant alpha factors. AlphaAgent employs three key mechanisms: (i) originality enforcement through a similarity measure based on abstract syntax trees (ASTs) against existing alphas, (ii) hypothesis-factor alignment via LLM-evaluated semantic consistency between market hypotheses and generated factors, and (iii) complexity control via AST-based structural constraints, preventing over-engineered constructions that are prone to overfitting. These mechanisms collectively guide the alpha generation process to balance originality, financial rationale, and adaptability to evolving market conditions, mitigating the risk of alpha decay. Extensive evaluations show that AlphaAgent outperforms traditional and LLM-based methods in mitigating alpha decay across bull and bear markets, consistently delivering significant alpha in Chinese CSI 500 and US S&P 500 markets over the past four years. Notably, AlphaAgent showcases remarkable resistance to alpha decay, elevating the potential for yielding powerful factors.

Related papers

• ARLArena: A Unified Framework for Stable Agentic Reinforcement Learning [75.73135757250806]
  Agentic reinforcement learning (ARL) has rapidly gained attention as a promising paradigm for training agents to solve complex, multi-step interactive tasks.<n>Despite encouraging early results, ARL remains highly unstable, often leading to training collapse.<n>In this paper, we first propose ARLArena, a stable training recipe and systematic analysis framework that examines training stability in a controlled and reproducible setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-25T03:43:34Z)
• QuantaAlpha: An Evolutionary Framework for LLM-Driven Alpha Mining [24.756255119539347]
  QuantaAlpha is an evolutionary alpha mining framework that treats each end-to-end mining run as a trajectory.<n> QuantaAlpha localizes suboptimal steps in each trajectory for targeted revision.<n>During factor generation, QuantaAlpha enforces semantic consistency across the hypothesis, factor expression, and executable code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-06T08:08:04Z)
• Agentic Confidence Calibration [67.50096917021521]
  Holistic Trajectory (HTC) is a novel diagnostic framework for AI agents.<n>HTC consistently surpasses strong baselines in both calibration and discrimination.<n>HTC provides interpretability by revealing the signals behind failure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T09:08:25Z)
• Alpha-R1: Alpha Screening with LLM Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning [28.326583684637853]
  Signal decay and regime shifts pose recurring challenges for data-driven investment strategies in non-stationary markets.<n>Existing factor-based methods typically reduce alphas to numerical time series, overlooking the semantic rationale that determines when a factor is economically relevant.<n>We propose Alpha-R1, an 8B- parameter reasoning model trained via reinforcement learning for context-aware alpha screening.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-29T14:50:23Z)
• Cognitive Alpha Mining via LLM-Driven Code-Based Evolution [29.71597480304934]
  We introduce the Cognitive Alpha Mining Framework (CogAlpha), which combines code-level alpha representation with LLM-driven reasoning and evolutionary search.<n>Treating LLMs as adaptive cognitive agents, our framework iteratively refines, mutates, and recombines alpha candidates through prompts and financial feedback.<n>Experiments on A-share equities demonstrate that CogAlpha consistently discovers alphas with superior predictive accuracy, robustness, and generalization over existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-24T07:45:59Z)
• Making LLMs Reliable When It Matters Most: A Five-Layer Architecture for High-Stakes Decisions [51.56484100374058]
  Current large language models (LLMs) excel in verifiable domains where outputs can be checked before action but prove less reliable for high-stakes strategic decisions with uncertain outcomes.<n>This gap, driven by mutually cognitive biases in both humans and artificial intelligence (AI) systems, threatens the defensibility of valuations and sustainability of investments in the sector.<n>This report describes a framework emerging from systematic qualitative assessment across 7 frontier-grade LLMs and 3 market-facing venture vignettes under time pressure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-10T22:24:21Z)
• Vulnerable Agent Identification in Large-Scale Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [49.31650627835956]
  Partial agent failure becomes inevitable when systems scale up, making it crucial to identify the subset of agents whose compromise would most severely degrade overall performance.<n>In this paper, we study this Vulnerable Agent Identification (VAI) problem in large-scale multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL)<n> Experiments show our method effectively identifies more vulnerable agents in large-scale MARL and the rule-based system, fooling system into worse failures, and learning a value function that reveals the vulnerability of each agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-18T16:03:50Z)
• AlphaEval: A Comprehensive and Efficient Evaluation Framework for Formula Alpha Mining [6.167227740097627]
  Formula alpha mining, which generates predictive signals from financial data, is critical for quantitative investment.<n>Existing evaluation metrics predominantly include backtesting and correlation-based measures.<n>We propose AlphaEval, a unified, parallelizable, and backtest-free evaluation framework for automated alpha mining models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-10T11:19:24Z)
• Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization [66.96989268893932]
  Large-scale reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has demonstrated its effectiveness in harnessing the potential of large language models (LLMs) for single-turn reasoning tasks.<n>Current RL algorithms inadequately balance the models' intrinsic long-horizon reasoning capabilities and their proficiency in multi-turn tool interactions.<n>We propose Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization (ARPO), a novel agentic RL algorithm tailored for training multi-turn LLM-based agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-26T07:53:11Z)
• Safety Devolution in AI Agents [56.482973617087254]
  This study investigates how expanding retrieval access affects model reliability, bias propagation, and harmful content generation.<n>Retrieval-augmented agents built on aligned LLMs often behave more unsafely than uncensored models without retrieval.<n>These findings underscore the need for robust mitigation strategies to ensure fairness and reliability in retrieval-augmented and increasingly autonomous AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T11:21:40Z)
• Navigating the Alpha Jungle: An LLM-Powered MCTS Framework for Formulaic Factor Mining [8.53606484300001]
  This paper introduces a novel framework that integrates Large Language Models (LLMs) with Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS)<n>A key innovation is the guidance of MCTS exploration by rich, quantitative feedback from financial backtesting of each candidate factor.<n> Experimental results on real-world stock market data demonstrate that our LLM-based framework outperforms existing methods by mining alphas with superior predictive accuracy and trading performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-16T11:14:17Z)
• Do LLMs trust AI regulation? Emerging behaviour of game-theoretic LLM agents [61.132523071109354]
  This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators and users, modelling their strategic choices under different regulatory scenarios. Our research identifies emerging behaviours of strategic AI agents, which tend to adopt more "pessimistic" stances than pure game-theoretic agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-11T15:41:21Z)
• Towards Fully Exploiting LLM Internal States to Enhance Knowledge Boundary Perception [58.62352010928591]
  Large language models (LLMs) exhibit impressive performance across diverse tasks but often struggle to accurately gauge their knowledge boundaries. This paper explores leveraging LLMs' internal states to enhance their perception of knowledge boundaries from efficiency and risk perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T11:11:09Z)
• Adversarial Reasoning at Jailbreaking Time [49.70772424278124]
  We develop an adversarial reasoning approach to automatic jailbreaking via test-time computation. Our approach introduces a new paradigm in understanding LLM vulnerabilities, laying the foundation for the development of more robust and trustworthy AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T18:59:01Z)
• QuantFactor REINFORCE: Mining Steady Formulaic Alpha Factors with Variance-bounded REINFORCE [5.560011325936085]
  The goal of alpha factor mining is to discover indicative signals of investment opportunities from the historical financial market data of assets. Recently, a promising framework is proposed for generating formulaic alpha factors using deep reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-08T15:57:58Z)
• AlphaForge: A Framework to Mine and Dynamically Combine Formulaic Alpha Factors [14.80394452270726]
  This paper proposes a two-stage alpha generating framework AlphaForge, for alpha factor mining and factor combination.<n> Experiments conducted on real-world datasets demonstrate that our proposed model outperforms contemporary benchmarks in formulaic alpha factor mining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T14:34:37Z)
• Agent Alignment in Evolving Social Norms [65.45423591744434]
  We propose an evolutionary framework for agent evolution and alignment, named EvolutionaryAgent. In an environment where social norms continuously evolve, agents better adapted to the current social norms will have a higher probability of survival and proliferation. We show that EvolutionaryAgent can align progressively better with the evolving social norms while maintaining its proficiency in general tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-09T15:44:44Z)
• Synergistic Formulaic Alpha Generation for Quantitative Trading based on Reinforcement Learning [1.3194391758295114]
  This paper proposes a method to enhance existing alpha factor mining approaches by expanding a search space. We employ information coefficient (IC) and rank information coefficient (Rank IC) as performance evaluation metrics for the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-05T08:49:13Z)
• How Far Are LLMs from Believable AI? A Benchmark for Evaluating the Believability of Human Behavior Simulation [46.42384207122049]
  We design SimulateBench to evaluate the believability of large language models (LLMs) when simulating human behaviors. Based on SimulateBench, we evaluate the performances of 10 widely used LLMs when simulating characters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T16:51:11Z)
• The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey [91.71061158000953]
  Large language models (LLMs) are regarded as potential sparks for Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) We start by tracing the concept of agents from its philosophical origins to its development in AI, and explain why LLMs are suitable foundations for agents. We explore the extensive applications of LLM-based agents in three aspects: single-agent scenarios, multi-agent scenarios, and human-agent cooperation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T17:12:03Z)
• Generating Synergistic Formulaic Alpha Collections via Reinforcement Learning [20.589583396095225]
  We propose a new alpha-mining framework that prioritizes mining a synergistic set of alphas. We show that our framework is able to achieve higher returns compared to previous approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T13:41:07Z)
• AlphaEvolve: A Learning Framework to Discover Novel Alphas in Quantitative Investment [16.27557073668891]
  We introduce a new class of alphas to model scalar, vector, and matrix features. The new alphas predict returns with high accuracy and can be mined into a weakly correlated set. We propose a novel alpha mining framework based on AutoML, called AlphaEvolve, to generate the new alphas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-30T09:28:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.