Sarang at DEFACTIFY 4.0: Detecting AI-Generated Text Using Noised Data and an Ensemble of DeBERTa Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.16857v1
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 05:32:00 GMT
- Title: Sarang at DEFACTIFY 4.0: Detecting AI-Generated Text Using Noised Data and an Ensemble of DeBERTa Models
- Authors: Avinash Trivedi, Sangeetha Sivanesan,
- Abstract summary: This paper presents an effective approach to detect AI-generated text.<n>It was developed for the Defactify 4.0 shared task at the fourth workshop on multimodal fact checking and hate speech detection.<n>Our team (Sarang) achieved the 1st place in both tasks with F1 scores of 1.0 and 0.9531, respectively.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This paper presents an effective approach to detect AI-generated text, developed for the Defactify 4.0 shared task at the fourth workshop on multimodal fact checking and hate speech detection. The task consists of two subtasks: Task-A, classifying whether a text is AI generated or human written, and Task-B, classifying the specific large language model that generated the text. Our team (Sarang) achieved the 1st place in both tasks with F1 scores of 1.0 and 0.9531, respectively. The methodology involves adding noise to the dataset to improve model robustness and generalization. We used an ensemble of DeBERTa models to effectively capture complex patterns in the text. The result indicates the effectiveness of our noise-driven and ensemble-based approach, setting a new standard in AI-generated text detection and providing guidance for future developments.
Related papers
- SKDU at De-Factify 4.0: Natural Language Features for AI-Generated Text-Detection [2.006175707670159]
NELA features significantly outperform RAIDAR features in distinguishing human-written and AI-generated text.
XGBoost emerged as the most effective, leveraging the rich feature sets to achieve high accuracy and generalisation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-28T11:25:05Z) - LuxVeri at GenAI Detection Task 1: Inverse Perplexity Weighted Ensemble for Robust Detection of AI-Generated Text across English and Multilingual Contexts [0.8495482945981923]
This paper presents a system developed for Task 1 of the COLING 2025 Workshop on Detecting AI-Generated Content.<n>Our approach utilizes an ensemble of models, with weights assigned according to each model's inverse perplexity, to enhance classification accuracy.<n>Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of inverse perplexity weighting in improving the robustness of machine-generated text detection across both monolingual and multilingual settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-21T06:32:32Z) - DeTeCtive: Detecting AI-generated Text via Multi-Level Contrastive Learning [24.99797253885887]
We argue that the key to accomplishing this task lies in distinguishing writing styles of different authors.
We propose DeTeCtive, a multi-task auxiliary, multi-level contrastive learning framework.
Our method is compatible with a range of text encoders.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-28T12:34:49Z) - Is Contrasting All You Need? Contrastive Learning for the Detection and Attribution of AI-generated Text [4.902089836908786]
WhosAI is a triplet-network contrastive learning framework designed to predict whether a given input text has been generated by humans or AI.
We show that our proposed framework achieves outstanding results in both the Turing Test and Authorship tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-12T15:44:56Z) - Contrastive Transformer Learning with Proximity Data Generation for
Text-Based Person Search [60.626459715780605]
Given a descriptive text query, text-based person search aims to retrieve the best-matched target person from an image gallery.
Such a cross-modal retrieval task is quite challenging due to significant modality gap, fine-grained differences and insufficiency of annotated data.
In this paper, we propose a simple yet effective dual Transformer model for text-based person search.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-15T16:26:49Z) - UniverSLU: Universal Spoken Language Understanding for Diverse Tasks with Natural Language Instructions [64.50935101415776]
We build a single model that jointly performs various spoken language understanding (SLU) tasks.
We demonstrate the efficacy of our single multi-task learning model "UniverSLU" for 12 speech classification and sequence generation task types spanning 17 datasets and 9 languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-04T17:10:23Z) - Generative AI Text Classification using Ensemble LLM Approaches [0.12483023446237698]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance across a variety of AI and natural language processing tasks.
We propose an ensemble neural model that generates probabilities from different pre-trained LLMs.
For the first task of distinguishing between AI and human generated text, our model ranked in fifth and thirteenth place.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-14T14:41:46Z) - FacTool: Factuality Detection in Generative AI -- A Tool Augmented
Framework for Multi-Task and Multi-Domain Scenarios [87.12753459582116]
A wider range of tasks now face an increasing risk of containing factual errors when handled by generative models.
We propose FacTool, a task and domain agnostic framework for detecting factual errors of texts generated by large language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-25T14:20:51Z) - VioLA: Unified Codec Language Models for Speech Recognition, Synthesis,
and Translation [91.39949385661379]
VioLA is a single auto-regressive Transformer decoder-only network that unifies various cross-modal tasks involving speech and text.
We first convert all the speech utterances to discrete tokens using an offline neural encoder.
We further integrate task IDs (TID) and language IDs (LID) into the proposed model to enhance the modeling capability of handling different languages and tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-25T14:39:47Z) - Effective Cross-Task Transfer Learning for Explainable Natural Language
Inference with T5 [50.574918785575655]
We compare sequential fine-tuning with a model for multi-task learning in the context of boosting performance on two tasks.
Our results show that while sequential multi-task learning can be tuned to be good at the first of two target tasks, it performs less well on the second and additionally struggles with overfitting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-31T13:26:08Z) - Towards Generalized Models for Task-oriented Dialogue Modeling on Spoken
Conversations [22.894541507068933]
This paper presents our approach to build generalized models for the Knowledge-grounded Task-oriented Dialogue Modeling on Spoken Conversations Challenge of DSTC-10.
We employ extensive data augmentation strategies on written data, including artificial error injection and round-trip text-speech transformation.
Our approach ranks third on the objective evaluation and second on the final official human evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-08T12:26:57Z) - TextFlint: Unified Multilingual Robustness Evaluation Toolkit for
Natural Language Processing [73.16475763422446]
We propose a multilingual robustness evaluation platform for NLP tasks (TextFlint)
It incorporates universal text transformation, task-specific transformation, adversarial attack, subpopulation, and their combinations to provide comprehensive robustness analysis.
TextFlint generates complete analytical reports as well as targeted augmented data to address the shortcomings of the model's robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-21T17:20:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.