Between Circuits and Chomsky: Pre-pretraining on Formal Languages Imparts Linguistic Biases

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.19249v1
• Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 15:55:55 GMT
• Title: Between Circuits and Chomsky: Pre-pretraining on Formal Languages Imparts Linguistic Biases
• Authors: Michael Y. Hu, Jackson Petty, Chuan Shi, William Merrill, Tal Linzen,
• Abstract summary: Pretraining language models on formal languages can improve their acquisition of natural language, but it is unclear which features of the formal language impart an inductive bias that leads to effective transfer.<n>We find that formal languages with both these properties enable language models to achieve lower loss on natural language and better linguistic generalization compared to other languages.
• Score: 47.920937001420505
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Pretraining language models on formal languages can improve their acquisition of natural language, but it is unclear which features of the formal language impart an inductive bias that leads to effective transfer. Drawing on insights from linguistics and complexity theory, we hypothesize that effective transfer occurs when the formal language both captures dependency structures in natural language and remains within the computational limitations of the model architecture. Focusing on transformers, we find that formal languages with both these properties enable language models to achieve lower loss on natural language and better linguistic generalization compared to other languages. In fact, pre-pretraining, or training on formal-then-natural language, reduces loss more efficiently than the same amount of natural language. For a 1B-parameter language model trained on roughly 1.6B tokens of natural language, pre-pretraining achieves the same loss and better linguistic generalization with a 33% smaller token budget. We also give mechanistic evidence of cross-task transfer from formal to natural language: attention heads acquired during formal language pretraining remain crucial for the model's performance on syntactic evaluations.

Related papers

• On the Acquisition of Shared Grammatical Representations in Bilingual Language Models [6.266732217239363]
  We ask what happens to a monolingual language model when it begins to be trained on a second language. To find evidence of shared multilingual representations, we turn to structural priming, a method used to study grammatical representations in humans. We argue that this asymmetry may shape hypotheses about human structural priming effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T23:27:58Z)
• The Role of Language Imbalance in Cross-lingual Generalisation: Insights from Cloned Language Experiments [57.273662221547056]
  In this study, we investigate an unintuitive novel driver of cross-lingual generalisation: language imbalance. We observe that the existence of a predominant language during training boosts the performance of less frequent languages. As we extend our analysis to real languages, we find that infrequent languages still benefit from frequent ones, yet whether language imbalance causes cross-lingual generalisation there is not conclusive.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T17:58:05Z)
• Machine Translation to Control Formality Features in the Target Language [0.9208007322096532]
  This research explores how machine learning methods are used to translate from English to languages with formality. It was done by training a bilingual model in a formality-controlled setting and comparing its performance with a pre-trained multilingual model. We evaluate the official formality accuracy(ACC) by comparing the predicted masked tokens with the ground truth.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T15:42:51Z)
• Soft Language Clustering for Multilingual Model Pre-training [57.18058739931463]
  We propose XLM-P, which contextually retrieves prompts as flexible guidance for encoding instances conditionally. Our XLM-P enables (1) lightweight modeling of language-invariant and language-specific knowledge across languages, and (2) easy integration with other multilingual pre-training methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T08:08:08Z)
• Overcoming Barriers to Skill Injection in Language Modeling: Case Study in Arithmetic [14.618731441943847]
  We develop a novel framework that enables language models to be mathematically proficient while retaining their linguistic prowess. Specifically, we offer information-theoretic interventions to overcome the catastrophic forgetting of linguistic skills that occurs while injecting non-linguistic skills into language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-03T18:53:30Z)
• Transparency Helps Reveal When Language Models Learn Meaning [71.96920839263457]
  Our systematic experiments with synthetic data reveal that, with languages where all expressions have context-independent denotations, both autoregressive and masked language models learn to emulate semantic relations between expressions. Turning to natural language, our experiments with a specific phenomenon -- referential opacity -- add to the growing body of evidence that current language models do not well-represent natural language semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T02:35:19Z)
• Linking Emergent and Natural Languages via Corpus Transfer [98.98724497178247]
  We propose a novel way to establish a link by corpus transfer between emergent languages and natural languages. Our approach showcases non-trivial transfer benefits for two different tasks -- language modeling and image captioning. We also introduce a novel metric to predict the transferability of an emergent language by translating emergent messages to natural language captions grounded on the same images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-24T21:24:54Z)
• Language Models are not Models of Language [0.0]
  Transfer learning has enabled large deep learning neural networks trained on the language modeling task to vastly improve performance. We argue that the term language model is misleading because deep learning models are not theoretical models of language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-13T22:39:46Z)
• Towards Zero-shot Language Modeling [90.80124496312274]
  We construct a neural model that is inductively biased towards learning human languages. We infer this distribution from a sample of typologically diverse training languages. We harness additional language-specific side information as distant supervision for held-out languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-06T23:49:18Z)
• Learning Music Helps You Read: Using Transfer to Study Linguistic Structure in Language Models [27.91397366776451]
  Training LSTMs on latent structure (MIDI music or Java code) improves test performance on natural language. Experiments on transfer between natural languages controlling for vocabulary overlap show that zero-shot performance on a test language is highly correlated with typological similarity to the training language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T06:24:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.