Asymptotics of Non-Convex Generalized Linear Models in High-Dimensions: A proof of the replica formula
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.20003v1
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 11:29:43 GMT
- Title: Asymptotics of Non-Convex Generalized Linear Models in High-Dimensions: A proof of the replica formula
- Authors: Matteo Vilucchio, Yatin Dandi, Cedric Gerbelot, Florent Krzakala,
- Abstract summary: We show how an algorithm can be used to prove the optimality of a non-dimensional Gaussian regularization model.<n>We also show how we can use the Tukey loss to prove the optimality of a negative regularization model.
- Score: 17.036996839737828
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The analytic characterization of the high-dimensional behavior of optimization for Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) with Gaussian data has been a central focus in statistics and probability in recent years. While convex cases, such as the LASSO, ridge regression, and logistic regression, have been extensively studied using a variety of techniques, the non-convex case remains far less understood despite its significance. A non-rigorous statistical physics framework has provided remarkable predictions for the behavior of high-dimensional optimization problems, but rigorously establishing their validity for non-convex problems has remained a fundamental challenge. In this work, we address this challenge by developing a systematic framework that rigorously proves replica-symmetric formulas for non-convex GLMs and precisely determines the conditions under which these formulas are valid. Remarkably, the rigorous replica-symmetric predictions align exactly with the conjectures made by physicists, and the so-called replicon condition. The originality of our approach lies in connecting two powerful theoretical tools: the Gaussian Min-Max Theorem, which we use to provide precise lower bounds, and Approximate Message Passing (AMP), which is shown to achieve these bounds algorithmically. We demonstrate the utility of this framework through significant applications: (i) by proving the optimality of the Tukey loss over the more commonly used Huber loss under a $\varepsilon$ contaminated data model, (ii) establishing the optimality of negative regularization in high-dimensional non-convex regression and (iii) characterizing the performance limits of linearized AMP algorithms. By rigorously validating statistical physics predictions in non-convex settings, we aim to open new pathways for analyzing increasingly complex optimization landscapes beyond the convex regime.
Related papers
- The Convex Landscape of Neural Networks: Characterizing Global Optima
and Stationary Points via Lasso Models [75.33431791218302]
Deep Neural Network Network (DNN) models are used for programming purposes.
In this paper we examine the use of convex neural recovery models.
We show that all the stationary non-dimensional objective objective can be characterized as the standard a global subsampled convex solvers program.
We also show that all the stationary non-dimensional objective objective can be characterized as the standard a global subsampled convex solvers program.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-19T23:04:56Z) - Convex Parameter Estimation of Perturbed Multivariate Generalized
Gaussian Distributions [18.95928707619676]
We propose a convex formulation with well-established properties for MGGD parameters.
The proposed framework is flexible as it combines a variety of regularizations for the precision matrix, the mean and perturbations.
Experiments show a more accurate precision and covariance matrix estimation with similar performance for the mean vector parameter.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-12T18:08:04Z) - Adaptive Linear Estimating Equations [5.985204759362746]
In this paper, we propose a general method for constructing debiased estimator.
It makes use of the idea of adaptive linear estimating equations, and we establish theoretical guarantees of normality.
A salient feature of our estimator is that in the context of multi-armed bandits, our estimator retains the non-asymptotic performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-14T12:55:47Z) - Curvature-Independent Last-Iterate Convergence for Games on Riemannian
Manifolds [77.4346324549323]
We show that a step size agnostic to the curvature of the manifold achieves a curvature-independent and linear last-iterate convergence rate.
To the best of our knowledge, the possibility of curvature-independent rates and/or last-iterate convergence has not been considered before.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-29T01:20:44Z) - Sampling from Gaussian Process Posteriors using Stochastic Gradient
Descent [43.097493761380186]
gradient algorithms are an efficient method of approximately solving linear systems.
We show that gradient descent produces accurate predictions, even in cases where it does not converge quickly to the optimum.
Experimentally, gradient descent achieves state-of-the-art performance on sufficiently large-scale or ill-conditioned regression tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-20T15:07:37Z) - On the Double Descent of Random Features Models Trained with SGD [78.0918823643911]
We study properties of random features (RF) regression in high dimensions optimized by gradient descent (SGD)
We derive precise non-asymptotic error bounds of RF regression under both constant and adaptive step-size SGD setting.
We observe the double descent phenomenon both theoretically and empirically.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-13T17:47:39Z) - Statistical optimality and stability of tangent transform algorithms in
logit models [6.9827388859232045]
We provide conditions on the data generating process to derive non-asymptotic upper bounds to the risk incurred by the logistical optima.
In particular, we establish local variation of the algorithm without any assumptions on the data-generating process.
We explore a special case involving a semi-orthogonal design under which a global convergence is obtained.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-25T05:15:13Z) - Understanding Implicit Regularization in Over-Parameterized Single Index
Model [55.41685740015095]
We design regularization-free algorithms for the high-dimensional single index model.
We provide theoretical guarantees for the induced implicit regularization phenomenon.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-16T13:27:47Z) - A Dynamical Systems Approach for Convergence of the Bayesian EM
Algorithm [59.99439951055238]
We show how (discrete-time) Lyapunov stability theory can serve as a powerful tool to aid, or even lead, in the analysis (and potential design) of optimization algorithms that are not necessarily gradient-based.
The particular ML problem that this paper focuses on is that of parameter estimation in an incomplete-data Bayesian framework via the popular optimization algorithm known as maximum a posteriori expectation-maximization (MAP-EM)
We show that fast convergence (linear or quadratic) is achieved, which could have been difficult to unveil without our adopted S&C approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-23T01:34:18Z) - Asymptotic Errors for Teacher-Student Convex Generalized Linear Models
(or : How to Prove Kabashima's Replica Formula) [23.15629681360836]
We prove an analytical formula for the reconstruction performance of convex generalized linear models.
We show that an analytical continuation may be carried out to extend the result to convex (non-strongly) problems.
We illustrate our claim with numerical examples on mainstream learning methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-11T16:26:35Z) - Multiplicative noise and heavy tails in stochastic optimization [62.993432503309485]
empirical optimization is central to modern machine learning, but its role in its success is still unclear.
We show that it commonly arises in parameters of discrete multiplicative noise due to variance.
A detailed analysis is conducted in which we describe on key factors, including recent step size, and data, all exhibit similar results on state-of-the-art neural network models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-11T09:58:01Z) - On Low-rank Trace Regression under General Sampling Distribution [9.699586426043885]
We show that cross-validated estimators satisfy near-optimal error bounds on general assumptions.
We also show that the cross-validated estimator outperforms the theory-inspired approach of selecting the parameter.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2019-04-18T02:56:00Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.