Constrained Linear Thompson Sampling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.02043v1
• Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 20:44:58 GMT
• Title: Constrained Linear Thompson Sampling
• Authors: Aditya Gangrade, Venkatesh Saligrama,
• Abstract summary: We study the safe linear bandit problem, where an agent sequentially selects actions from a convex domain to maximize an unknown objective.<n>Existing approaches rely on optimism-based methods with frequentist confidence bounds, often leading to computationally expensive action selection routines.<n>We propose COnstrained Linear Thompson Sampling (COLTS), a sampling-based framework that efficiently balances regret minimization and constraint satisfaction.
• Score: 39.724313550777715
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We study the safe linear bandit problem, where an agent sequentially selects actions from a convex domain to maximize an unknown objective while ensuring unknown linear constraints are satisfied on a per-round basis. Existing approaches primarily rely on optimism-based methods with frequentist confidence bounds, often leading to computationally expensive action selection routines. We propose COnstrained Linear Thompson Sampling (COLTS), a sampling-based framework that efficiently balances regret minimization and constraint satisfaction by selecting actions on the basis of noisy perturbations of the estimates of the unknown objective vector and constraint matrix. We introduce three variants of COLTS, distinguished by the learner's available side information: - S-COLTS assumes access to a known safe action and ensures strict constraint enforcement by combining the COLTS approach with a rescaling towards the safe action. For $d$-dimensional actions, this yields $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{d^3 T})$ regret and zero constraint violations (or risk). - E-COLTS enforces constraints softly under Slater's condition, and attains regret and risk of $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{d^3 T})$ by combining COLTS with uniform exploration. - R-COLTS requires no side information, and ensures instance-independent regret and risk of $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{d^3 T})$ by leveraging repeated resampling. A key technical innovation is a coupled noise design, which maintains optimism while preserving computational efficiency, which is combined with a scaling based analysis technique to address the variation of the per-round feasible region induced by sampled constraint matrices. Our methods match the regret bounds of prior approaches, while significantly reducing computational costs compared to them, thus yielding a scalable and practical approach for constrained bandit linear optimization.

Related papers

• Learning to Explore with Lagrangians for Bandits under Unknown Linear Constraints [8.784438985280094]
  We study problems as pure exploration in multi-armed bandits with unknown linear constraints. First, we propose a Lagrangian relaxation of the sample complexity lower bound for pure exploration under constraints. Second, we leverage the Lagrangian lower bound and the properties of convex to propose two computationally efficient extensions of Track-and-Stop and Gamified Explorer, namely LATS and LAGEX.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T15:26:14Z)
• Online Constraint Tightening in Stochastic Model Predictive Control: A Regression Approach [49.056933332667114]
  No analytical solutions exist for chance-constrained optimal control problems. We propose a data-driven approach for learning the constraint-tightening parameters online during control. Our approach yields constraint-tightening parameters that tightly satisfy the chance constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T16:22:02Z)
• Safe Linear Bandits over Unknown Polytopes [39.177982674455784]
  The safe linear bandit problem (SLB) is an online approach to linear programming with unknown objective and unknown roundwise constraints. We study the tradeoffs between efficacy and smooth safety costs of SLBs over polytopes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-27T21:13:32Z)
• Log Barriers for Safe Black-box Optimization with Application to Safe Reinforcement Learning [72.97229770329214]
  We introduce a general approach for seeking high dimensional non-linear optimization problems in which maintaining safety during learning is crucial. Our approach called LBSGD is based on applying a logarithmic barrier approximation with a carefully chosen step size. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on minimizing violation in policy tasks in safe reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-21T11:14:47Z)
• Interactively Learning Preference Constraints in Linear Bandits [100.78514640066565]
  We study sequential decision-making with known rewards and unknown constraints. As an application, we consider learning constraints to represent human preferences in a driving simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-10T17:52:58Z)
• Penalized Proximal Policy Optimization for Safe Reinforcement Learning [68.86485583981866]
  We propose Penalized Proximal Policy Optimization (P3O), which solves the cumbersome constrained policy iteration via a single minimization of an equivalent unconstrained problem. P3O utilizes a simple-yet-effective penalty function to eliminate cost constraints and removes the trust-region constraint by the clipped surrogate objective. We show that P3O outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms with respect to both reward improvement and constraint satisfaction on a set of constrained locomotive tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T06:15:51Z)
• Safe Online Bid Optimization with Return-On-Investment and Budget Constraints subject to Uncertainty [87.81197574939355]
  We study the nature of both the optimization and learning problems. We provide an algorithm, namely GCB, guaranteeing sublinear regret at the cost of a potentially linear number of constraints violations. More interestingly, we provide an algorithm, namely GCB_safe(psi,phi), guaranteeing both sublinear pseudo-regret and safety w.h.p. at the cost of accepting tolerances psi and phi.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-18T17:24:20Z)
• Concave Utility Reinforcement Learning with Zero-Constraint Violations [43.29210413964558]
  We consider the problem of concave utility reinforcement learning (CURL) with convex constraints. We propose a model-based learning algorithm that also achieves zero constraint violations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-12T06:13:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.