Open Source at a Crossroads: The Future of Licensing Driven by Monetization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.02817v1
• Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 17:44:01 GMT
• Title: Open Source at a Crossroads: The Future of Licensing Driven by Monetization
• Authors: Raula Gaikovina Kula, Christoph Treude,
• Abstract summary: Open Source Software Licenses (OSS licenses) ensure that software can be sold or distributed as part of aggregate programs from various sources without requiring a royalty or fee.<n>We argue that open source is at a crossroads, with a growing need to redefine its licensing models and support communities and critical software.
• Score: 11.149764135999437
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The widespread adoption of open source libraries and frameworks can be attributed to their licensing. Open Source Software Licenses (OSS licenses) ensure that software can be sold or distributed as part of aggregate programs from various sources without requiring a royalty or fee. The quality of such code rivals that of commercial software, with open source libraries forming large parts of the supply chain for critical commercial systems in industry. Despite this, most open source projects rely on volunteer contributions, and unpaid library maintainers face significant pressure to sustain their projects. One potential solution for these projects is to change their licensing to ensure that maintainers are compensated accordingly for their work. In this paper, we explore the potential of licensing to help alleviate funding issues, with a review of three different cases where OSS licenses were modified to allow for monetization. In addition, we explore licensing concerns related to the emergence of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in software development. We argue that open source is at a crossroads, with a growing need to redefine its licensing models and support communities and critical software. We identify specific research opportunities and conclude with a research agenda comprising a series of research questions to guide future studies in this area.

Related papers

• Is Open Source the Future of AI? A Data-Driven Approach [41.94295877935867]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become central in academia and industry.<n>Key issue is the trustworthiness of proprietary models, with open-sourcing often proposed as a solution.<n>Open-sourcing presents challenges, including potential misuse, financial disincentives, and intellectual property concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-27T09:03:49Z)
• "They've Stolen My GPL-Licensed Model!": Toward Standardized and Transparent Model Licensing [30.19362102481241]
  We develop a new vocabulary for ML workflow management and encoded license rules to enable ontological reasoning for analyzing rights granting and compliance issues.<n>Our analysis tool is built on Turtle language and Notation3 reasoning engine, envisioned as first step toward Linked Open Model Data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T06:52:09Z)
• An Overview and Catalogue of Dependency Challenges in Open Source Software Package Registries [52.23798016734889]
  This article provides a catalogue of dependency-related challenges that come with relying on OSS packages or libraries. The catalogue is based on the scientific literature on empirical research that has been conducted to understand, quantify and overcome these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T16:20:20Z)
• Agent-Driven Automatic Software Improvement [55.2480439325792]
  This research proposal aims to explore innovative solutions by focusing on the deployment of agents powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) The iterative nature of agents, which allows for continuous learning and adaptation, can help surpass common challenges in code generation. We aim to use the iterative feedback in these systems to further fine-tune the LLMs underlying the agents, becoming better aligned to the task of automated software improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T15:45:22Z)
• On the modification and revocation of open source licences [0.14843690728081999]
  This paper argues for the creation of a subset of rights that allows open source contributors to force users to update to the most recent version of a model. Legal, reputational and moral risks related to open-sourcing AI models could justify contributors having more control over downstream uses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T00:00:25Z)
• Catch the Butterfly: Peeking into the Terms and Conflicts among SPDX Licenses [16.948633594354412]
  Third-party libraries (TPLs) in software development has accelerated the creation of modern software. Developers may inadvertently violate the licenses of TPLs, leading to legal issues. There is a need for a high-quality license dataset that encompasses a broad range of mainstream licenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-19T11:27:34Z)
• LiResolver: License Incompatibility Resolution for Open Source Software [13.28021004336228]
  LiResolver is a fine-grained, scalable, and flexible tool to resolve license incompatibility issues for open source software. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of LiResolver, with 4.09% false positive (FP) rate and 0.02% false negative (FN) rate for incompatibility issue localization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-26T13:16:09Z)
• Analyzing Maintenance Activities of Software Libraries [55.2480439325792]
  Industrial applications heavily integrate open-source software libraries nowadays. I want to introduce an automatic monitoring approach for industrial applications to identify open-source dependencies that show negative signs regarding their current or future maintenance activities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T16:51:25Z)
• CodeTF: One-stop Transformer Library for State-of-the-art Code LLM [72.1638273937025]
  We present CodeTF, an open-source Transformer-based library for state-of-the-art Code LLMs and code intelligence. Our library supports a collection of pretrained Code LLM models and popular code benchmarks. We hope CodeTF is able to bridge the gap between machine learning/generative AI and software engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T05:24:48Z)
• Lessons from Formally Verified Deployed Software Systems (Extended version) [65.69802414600832]
  This article examines a range of projects, in various application areas, that have produced formally verified systems and deployed them for actual use. It considers the technologies used, the form of verification applied, the results obtained, and the lessons that the software industry should draw regarding its ability to benefit from formal verification techniques and tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-05T18:18:46Z)
• Defining the role of open source software in research reproducibility [0.0]
  I make a new proposal for the role of open source software. I look for explanation of its success from the perspectives of connectivism. I contend that engenders trust, which we routinely build in community via conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-26T19:52:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.